1) Connection to global
warming The model simulates an increase in Northern England precipitation in winter, but the trend is not as large as the observed one.
Not exact matches
Helling used the
model to
simulate how dust whirls and swirls around in the atmospheres of brown dwarfs: gassy bodies too big and
warm to be planets, but too small and cool to be stars.
Climate
models simulate real physical processes which operate in both cooling and
warming climates.
They found no significant trends, but when they put the data into computer
models and
simulated a rise in temperature — as predicted through global
warming — the results were striking.
By the end of the
simulated grand solar minimum, however, the
warming in the
model with the
simulated Maunder Minimum had nearly caught up to the reference simulation.
Although computer
models used to project climate changes from increasing greenhouse gas concentrations consistently
simulate an increasing upward airflow in the tropics with global
warming, this flow can not be directly observed.
Using 19 climate
models, a team of researchers led by Professor Minghua Zhang of the School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences at Stony Brook University, discovered persistent dry and
warm biases of
simulated climate over the region of the Southern Great Plain in the central U.S. that was caused by poor
modeling of atmospheric convective systems — the vertical transport of heat and moisture in the atmosphere.
For example, in a
simulated world where the atmospheric CO2 levels were double today's values — a scenario many scientists believe likely —
models predict that Earth will
warm by more than 2 °C.
The explanation for this could be that the global
warming is not yet strong enough to trigger the changes in precipitation patterns that climate
models simulate,» reports Charpentier Ljungqvist.
The authors compared the Paris Agreement 1.5 C
warming scenario to the currently pledged 3.5 C by using computer
models to
simulate changes in global fisheries and quantify losses or gains.
Each
model simulated a «control climate,» for the years 1981 to 2000, as well as a «
warm climate,» for the years 2081 to 2100, assuming relatively high emissions of greenhouse gases.
An unprecedented experiment So how does this finding negate the suggestion that «unknown unknown» climate factors might influence a
warmer world, making it nearly impossible to
simulate the future using climate
models?
«It turns out that the
model -
simulated trends over the region are matching up quite well with the observed
warming that we're seeing,» said NOAA's Knutson.
The observed patterns of
warming, including greater
warming over land than over the ocean, and their changes over time, are only
simulated by
models that include anthropogenic forcing.
Testing
models against the existing instrumental record suggested CO2 must cause global
warming, because the
models could not
simulate what had already happened unless the extra CO2 was added to the
model.
Knutson, T.R., and R.E. Tuleya, 2004: Impact of CO2 - induced
warming on
simulated hurricane intensity and precipitation: Sensitivity to the choice of climate
model and convective parameterization.
Yoshizaki, M., et al., 2005: Changes of Baui (Mei - yu) frontal activity in the global
warming climate
simulated by a non-hydrostatic regional
model.
Atmosphere - Ocean General Circulation
Models are able to
simulate extreme
warm temperatures, cold air outbreaks and frost days reasonably well.
One looked at the historical temperature record and compared how often such severe heat waves occurred a century ago versus today using 3 - day averages; the other used climate
models that
simulate a world with and without
warming to see how the odds of such an event shifted.
The diagnostics, which are used to compare
model -
simulated and observed changes, are often simple temperature indices such as the global mean surface temperature and ocean mean
warming (Knutti et al., 2002, 2003) or the differential
warming between the SH and NH (together with the global mean; Andronova and Schlesinger, 2001).
«Across -
model relationships between currently observable attributes of the climate system and the
simulated magnitude of future
warming have the potential to inform projections.
Figure 3 is a similar graphic to that presented in Meehl et al. (2004), comparing the average global surface
warming simulated by the
model using natural forcings only (blue), anthropogenic forcings only (red), and the combination of the two (gray).
If true climate sensitivity is only 50 - 65 % of the magnitude that is being
simulated by climate
models, then it is not unreasonable to infer that attribution of late 20th century
warming is not 100 % caused by anthropogenic factors, and attribution to anthropogenic forcing is in the middle tercile (50 - 50).
And because these events can be
simulated by
models, we can use these
models to find out whether positive IOD events will become more common in a
warming world.
«This uncertainty is illustrated by Pollard et al. (2015), who found that addition of hydro - fracturing and cliff failure into their ice sheet
model increased
simulated sea level rise from 2 m to 17 m, in response to only 2 °C ocean
warming and accelerated the time for substantial change from several centuries to several decades.»
Indeed,
models do
simulate similar
warming for different reasons as discussed in e.g., Knutti, 2008.
... it is sometimes argued that the severity of
model - projected global
warming can be taken less seriously on the grounds that
models fail to
simulate the current climate sufficiently accurately.
On the contrary, our results add to a broadening collection of research indicating that
models that
simulate today's climate best tend to be the
models that project the most global
warming over the remainder of the twenty - first century.
We recently published a study in Scientific Reports titled Comparing the
model -
simulated global
warming signal to observations using empirical estimates of unforced noise.
Knutson & Tuleya (2004) Impact of CO2 - Induced
Warming on
Simulated Hurricane Intensity and Precipitation: Sensitivity to the Choice of Climate
Model and Convective Parameterization, J. Clim.
Yadvinder Malhi, an ecologist at Oxford specializing in the Amazon, said that nearly all climate
models simulating the impacts of global
warming show the area staying wet even as other parts of the vast basin get drier.
Kosaka and Xie made global climate simulations in which they inserted specified observed Pacific Ocean temperatures; they found that the
model simulated well the observed global
warming slowdown or «hiatus,» although this experiment does not identify the cause of Pacific Ocean temperature trends.
Interestingly, the
models that best
simulate the recent past of these energy exchanges between the planet and its surroundings tend to project greater - than - average
warming in the future.
Models simulate that global mean precipitation increases with global
warming.
The lie that
warmer = drier comes from the climate
models of the 1980s to early 1990s which could not
simulate rain, and thus people
simulated temperature but kept rainfall constant in their assessments, leading to silly claims like the SE USA would turn into tropical savanna.
Thomas R. Knutson and Robert E. Tuleya, «Impact of CO2 - Induced
Warming on
Simulated Hurricane Intensity and Precipitation: Sensitivity to the Choice of Climate
Model and Convective Parameterization,» Journal of Climate, vol.
Their strategy relied on the idea that the
models that are going to be the most skillful in their projections of future
warming should also be the most skillful in other contexts, such as
simulating the recent past.
The uncertainty in the range of future
warming is mostly due to differences in how
models simulate changes in clouds with global
warming.
Coupled
models simulate much less
warming over the 20th century in response to solar forcing alone than to greenhouse gas forcing (Cubasch et al., 1997; Broccoli et al., 2003; Meehl et al., 2004), independent of which solar forcing reconstruction is used (Chapter 2).
Fyfe and colleagues (2013) find that the observed
warming over the periods 1993 - 2012 and 1998 - 2012 is significantly less than the
warming in climate
model simulations, but that the same
models successfully
simulate the rate of
warming over the 1900 - 2012 period.
For the mid-Holocene, coupled climate
models are able to
simulate mid-latitude
warming and enhanced monsoons, with little change in global mean temperature (< 0.4 °C), consistent with our understanding of orbital forcing.
Adapted for Australian oceans, the
model simulates the effect of climate in the 2060s on temperature and currents in the
warm pool, a tuna habitat defined by
warmer surface water.
When increasing CO2 is added, their
models can
simulate average global
warming since the 1970s.
Utterly wrong: the computer climate
models on which predictions of rapid
warming from enhanced atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration cowdungare based «run hot,»
simulating two to three times the
warming actually observed over relevant periods
[27] Paul C. Knappenberger and Patrick J. Michaels, «Climate
Models» Tendency to
Simulate Too Much
Warming and the IPCC's Attempt to Cover That Up,» Cato Institute, October 10, 2013, http://www.cato.org/blog/climate-
models-tendency-
simulate-too-much-
warming-ipccs-attempt-cover (accessed October 28, 2014).
It is worth noting the only «evidence» scientists have that the earth's changing climate has been driven by rising CO2 is based on their
models» failures to
simulate 20th century
warming when only «known» natural factors are considered.
A paper published in Nature Climate Change, Frame and Stone (2012), sought to evaluate the FAR temperature projection accuracy by using a simple climate
model to
simulate the
warming from 1990 through 2010 based on observed GHG and other global heat imbalance changes.
So, they didn't actually
simulate sea level changes, but instead estimated how much sea level rise they would expect from man - made global
warming, and then used computer
model predictions of temperature changes, to predict that sea levels will have risen by 0.8 - 2 metres by 2100.
A number of the man - made global
warming computer
models have tried to
simulate how much «sea level rise» to expect from man - made global
warming, e.g., Meehl et al., 20015 (Abstract; Google Scholar access); Jevrejeva et al., 2010 (Abstract; Google Scholar access); Jevrejeva et al., 2012 (Abstract; Google Scholar access).
First, the computer climate
models on which predictions of rapid
warming from enhanced atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration are based «run hot,»
simulating two to three times the
warming actually observed over relevant periods — during which non-anthropogenic causes probably accounted for some and could have accounted for all the observed
warming — and therefore provide no rational basis for predicting future GAT.