Sentences with phrase «warming activists claim»

«Global warming activists claim a serious public concern presently exists and the overwhelming majority of scientists agrees humans are creating a global warming crisis.

James M. Taylor — Heartland.org — January 19, 2014 Global warming activists claim vast amounts of untraceable special - interest money fund global warming skeptics and give skeptics an unfair advantage in the global warming debate.

Not exact matches

Obviously, the burden of proof is on the IPCC and activists like Trenberth to justify their claim that the warming is «very likely» due to human activities, which they have completely failed to do.

Although global - warming activists, including President Obama, consistently claim that the science on global warming is settled, anyone who has any familiarity with the scientific process would understand that research is a constant, ongoing process.

He says global warming is based not on science but on a «hoax» and on «witchcraft» and on «claims dreamt up by environmental activists».

«It claimed that «simply proceeding to the discovery phase of a global warming case» — during which the oil corporations would be required to turn over internal documents — «would be significant» for activists...

Another exclusive Climate Depot report took on another global warming activist professor claimed the failure to pass a climate bill was the greatest «ethical» failure of Washignton DC.

«Could turn the climate change world upside down» The rise in skeptical scientists are responding not only to an increase in dire «predictions» of climate change, but also a steady stream of peer - reviewed studies, analyses, real world data, and inconvenient developments have further cast doubts on the claims of man - made global warming fear activists.

Specifically, the activists complain that, during the presidential primary campaign, «claims were made that the Earth is not warming.»

Enviro - activists using the mainstream media's monster - megaphone to push claims of catastrophic man - caused global warming as a settled science needing immediate fixing have almost completely drowned out the opposition, and an unmistakable part of the blaring 20 year + message was the demand to ignore industry - bribed skeptics.

Taken further against a central clique of enviro - activists, the claim that Exxon's «faillure to disclose that it knew its products increased the health hazard of global warming» was racketeering could be flipped against them.

As the real world evidence mounts that global warming claims are failing, climate activists have ramped up predictions of future climate change impacts, declaring that it is «worse than we thought.»

One of the unfortunate side effects of which was that (and this is not necessarily your field's fault in the direct sense) every two - bit environmental activist, campaigner, and pressure group took it as license to fully politicize the science with naive and exaggerated claims about the «effects» of global warming (apparently it's responsible for everything), or where the «tipping point» was (30 years, no 20 years, no 10 years, etc.) or how quickly we could «de-carbonize» our economy (50 % reduction in 40 years, no 70 % in 30 years, no 90 % in 15 years).

Such adjusted data has been used by climate scientists and environmental activists to claim that 2014 was the warmest year on record.

While environmental activists and some politicians claim «the debate is over» and call for immediate action to reduce man - made greenhouse gas emissions, others say the science points to only a very small human impact — too small to warrant concern — and the costs of trying to prevent global warming far exceed the benefits.

Specifically, the Greenpeace activists claimed that they were preventing «damage to properties worldwide caused by global warming».

The fallout from this March 21 tutorial hearing was that enviro - activists ignored what the judge concluded about that «GCC / GCSCT» material and instead proclaimed a hugely overgeneralized victory about the position stated by Chevron's attorney * (* author's addition: which is noted my April 19, 2018 blog post), while Michael Bastasch at The Daily Caller reported that a «Federal Judge Dismissed Claim Of A Conspiracy To Suppress Global Warming Science.»

According to Taylor, «Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have demolished claims by global warming activists that global warming caused or worsened many extreme weather events last year.»

In no particular order, there are the Leftist economists for whom global warming represents a supreme example of market failure (as well as a wonderful opportunity to suggest correctives), UN apparatchiks for whom global warming is the route to global governance, Third world dictators who see guilt over global warming as providing a convenient claim on aid (ie, the transfer of wealth from the poor in rich countries to the wealthy in poor countries), Environmental activists who love any issue that has the capacity to frighten the gullible into making hefty contributions to their numerous NGOs, Crony capitalists who see the immense sums being made available for «sustainable» energy, Government regulators for whom the control of a natural product of breathing is a dream come true, Newly minted billionaires who find the issue of «saving the planet» appropriately suitable to their grandiose pretensions, Politicians who can fasten on to CAGW as a signature issue where they can act as demagogues without fear of contradiction from reality or complaint from the purported beneficiaries of their actions.

But the hard scientific data revealing no connection to «global warming» will not prevent the media and climate activists from their usual claims trying to link wildfires to «climate change.»»