Sentences with phrase «warming alarmist in»

That information like this was not widely known until recently was, in part, a testament to the effectiveness of the global warming alarmists in suppressing the publication of dissenting opinion.

According to the Global Warming alarmists in 2008, we should have seen no snow at all in the U.S. this year — in 2015.

Preventing asthma is now the principal reason brought forward by the global warming alarmists in Congress to cripple the U. S. economy with energy - rationing regulations.

It was more than just luck though: the global warming alarmists in Congress who had called Hansen scheduled him to testify during the heat wave and turned the air conditioning off that day.

Not exact matches

Global warming alarmists have something like Gadaffi's initial air superiority over rag - tag opponents in Libya.

All in all, it's been a sorry month or so for the global - warming alarmists.

So the alarmist community has reacted predictably by issuing ever more apocalyptic statements, like the federal report» Global Change Impacts in the United States» issued last week which predicts more frequent heat waves, rising water temperatures, more wildfires, rising disease levels, and rising sea levels — headlined, in a paper I read, as «Getting Warmer.»

In fact, man - made climate - change - global - warming * is * just a theory, and one that has been disproved by climate realists, but is still successfully promoted by climate alarmists.

In his epilogue the author states, «In a sense, this book is an exercise in optimism,» and «The consequences of global warming described in this book may be alarming, but they're not meant to be alarmist.&raquIn his epilogue the author states, «In a sense, this book is an exercise in optimism,» and «The consequences of global warming described in this book may be alarming, but they're not meant to be alarmist.&raquIn a sense, this book is an exercise in optimism,» and «The consequences of global warming described in this book may be alarming, but they're not meant to be alarmist.&raquin optimism,» and «The consequences of global warming described in this book may be alarming, but they're not meant to be alarmist.&raquin this book may be alarming, but they're not meant to be alarmist.»

Then it ends by quoting Winston Churchill in a way that's meant to group the furthest - out global - warming alarmist with the likes of RC and other responsible scientists: «A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.»

Anyone interested in the present and recent RealClimate postings will likely want to visit the Wall Street Journal's OpinionJournal.com today, where there's a link to an op - ed by MIT's Richard Lindzen that's headlined this way: «FREE INQUIRY: Climate of Fear: Global - warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence.»

In a column titled «In 2008, a 100 Percent Chance of Alarm,» he exposes the Chicken Littles for what they are — opportunists and alarmists who in this new year «will bring you image after frightening image of natural havoc linked to global warming.&raquIn a column titled «In 2008, a 100 Percent Chance of Alarm,» he exposes the Chicken Littles for what they are — opportunists and alarmists who in this new year «will bring you image after frightening image of natural havoc linked to global warming.&raquIn 2008, a 100 Percent Chance of Alarm,» he exposes the Chicken Littles for what they are — opportunists and alarmists who in this new year «will bring you image after frightening image of natural havoc linked to global warming.&raquin this new year «will bring you image after frightening image of natural havoc linked to global warming.»

If science advocacy has to include statements such as «Alas, as with most over-simplified global warming claptrap, more thought goes into coming up with the alarmist concept than in actually looking into whether or not it is true», then I don't think it belongs in the discussion.

There's more of the quote here: «I am afraid that global warming alarmists are tyring to kill the freedom of people and prosperity,» Klaus reportedly told the reporter in the report reported in newspapers worldwide that day.

Skeptics have long cited Doran's research to show that global warming is a flawed theory motivated by alarmist scientists more interested in scaring up huge research grants than in pursuing the evidence with honesty and integrity.

Regarding the issue of whether some «mainstream» scientists are «alarmist» in their discussions of global warming, it is well to remember that, in any controversy, scientific or otherwise, there will be extremists at both ends of the spectrum.

In reality, no climate models predict any probability of warming over 10 C. Of all the alarmist lies, this one takes the first prize hands down.

Global warming alarmists have their economic understandings and goals rooted in communism, and have no understanding of the power of free markets, and individual freedom in general.

At some point in time the public needs to wake up and realize that the alarmists are most likely exaggerating the amount of CO2 induced warming and that there is no catastrophe coming.

Even as many promoting the global - warming theory have moderated their language in the interest of restoring credibility, others on the same side of the table have actually employed more alarmist language, as if to compensate for the lack of climatic temperature increase by turning up the verbal heat.

In the latest chapter in the ongoing crusade against manmade global warming, alarmists have blamed climate change for the creation of «ghost forests» along the U.S. Atlantic seaboarIn the latest chapter in the ongoing crusade against manmade global warming, alarmists have blamed climate change for the creation of «ghost forests» along the U.S. Atlantic seaboarin the ongoing crusade against manmade global warming, alarmists have blamed climate change for the creation of «ghost forests» along the U.S. Atlantic seaboard.

Here is what I actually said: ``... the climate alarmists maintain that Africa is already experiencing natural disasters — principally floods, droughts, malaria and other diseases, arising from unnatural global warming, and that these are causing increases in poverty, malnutrition, disease and environmental damage.

In our present context, this Simonian pattern is evident in the decline in mortality rates from heat in the United States, even though (as the climate alarmists tell us repeatedly) the U.S. has gotten warmer since industrializatioIn our present context, this Simonian pattern is evident in the decline in mortality rates from heat in the United States, even though (as the climate alarmists tell us repeatedly) the U.S. has gotten warmer since industrializatioin the decline in mortality rates from heat in the United States, even though (as the climate alarmists tell us repeatedly) the U.S. has gotten warmer since industrializatioin mortality rates from heat in the United States, even though (as the climate alarmists tell us repeatedly) the U.S. has gotten warmer since industrializatioin the United States, even though (as the climate alarmists tell us repeatedly) the U.S. has gotten warmer since industrialization.

It's rather funny that you Alarmist simply can't stick to fact, yes it was consider bull warmer in the north but the global temperature was a few degrees C higher on average for long periods during The Holocene.

The 47,000 wildfires last year may seem like a very large number — and it certainly gives global warming alarmists like Brown plenty of fodder for misleading global warming claims — but the 47,000 wildfires was less than half the average number of wildfires that occurred each year in the 1960s and 1970s.

In other words, the more we learn the more we see that everything is unusual compared to what the global warming alarmists predict.

The worst outcome for gobal warming alarmists like Chad Blair who deal in blatant lies, to push their agenda, is being guilty of an excess of virtue.

What if the expertise of global warming alarmists is undeniable but the injury they seek to prevent can be compared to a trip and fall hazard faced by all of humanity caused by a difference of one - quarter inch in elevation between a parking lot and a sidewalk in front of a Mississippi Walmart?

Mr. Horner, the author of «Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed,» noted that he had proudly quoted Greenpeace calling him a «climate criminal» on the cover of that book, published in 2008.

Sure it's a short time period, but nothing in any alarmist prediction or IPCC report hinted that there was any possibility that for even so short a time as 15 years warming might cease (at least not in the last IPCC report, which I have read nearly every page of).

In other words, this Tex86 proxy (which is being used very extensively in the warming alarmist literature now and is showing more warming in the past for example as a result of small changes in CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibrateIn other words, this Tex86 proxy (which is being used very extensively in the warming alarmist literature now and is showing more warming in the past for example as a result of small changes in CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibratein the warming alarmist literature now and is showing more warming in the past for example as a result of small changes in CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibratein the past for example as a result of small changes in CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibratein CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibratein calibration and is probably mis - calibrated.

In other words, «Forecast the Facts» was originally conceived as a front group controlled by far - left advocacy groups to hide behind while attacking meteorologists, who surveys show tend to be very skeptical of the claims of global warming alarmists.

Like all databases in the hands of confirmed alarmists any changes always cool the past and warm the present.

He notes the change in language by alarmists from «warming» to «climate change» in an attempt to substitute extreme climate events for the now non-existent warming trend.

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change has been vigorously attacked by some environmentalists and global warming alarmists who view it as a threat to their claim of a «consensus» in favor of their extreme views.

(4) Will warming in the next century really be catastrophic, or could it actually be beneficial in ways the alarmists won't concede?

National Geographic, like other choristers in the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) alarmist choir, is hyping the latest «climate research,» in this case, the new computer modeling program of a team at the University College of London's (UCL) Institute for Sustainable Resources.

Until then, count me among the skeptics who consider this a political rather than scientific issue, especially in light of the fact that it is believed that the Antarctic and arctic shelves are breaking from stress (from «overgrowth»), not due to heat, since they are larger than they have been during recorded history, and that when the alarmists are proven conclusively to be wrong, they change the terminology («global cooling» to «global warming» to «global climate change» - face it, the global climate always has been and always will be very dynamic).

According to climate alarmists, the frequency and severity of this natural hazard should already be increasing in response to model - based predictions of CO2 - induced global warming.

If you're not a global warming geek, the point of the material is that we have apparent — and I only say apparent at this point — written admissions of cooking the books, among other nastiness, by the leading names in the global warming alarmist movement.

Global warming alarmist «believers» in global elite circles will ignore this report because it doesn't fit their agenda, which is to drive people into Sustainable Development.

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

In the article, headlined «Time that climate alarmists fessed up,» Bolt claimed that «the planet hasn't actually warmed for a decade - or even 15 years, according to new temperature data from Britain's Met Office.»

No matter whether the late 20th century warming was in any way different from earlier warming periods, it fell on PREPARED GROUND — there were already flocks of alarmists in waiting!

«Since its creation in 2006 the site has done nothing but post poorly researched propaganda with a clear intent to smear respected scientists, policy analysts or groups who dare oppose an alarmist position on global warming.

Horner outlines the details in his 2008 book Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmist Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep you Misinformed.

Two months ago, James Lovelock, the godfather of global warming, gave a startling interview to msnbc.com in which he acknowledged he had been unduly «alarmist» about climate change.

Earlier last year, following an article reviewing 6 (also alarmist) books on the environment including Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth, Nicholas Stern's report, and George Monbiot's Heat, we discovered that, inconveniently, May had taken a few liberties with the facts himself, citing a single study, referenced in the Stern Report to make the claim that» 15 — 40 per cent of species «were vulnerable to extinction at just 2 degrees of warming, and that oil companies were responsible for a conspiracy to spread misinformation, and prevent action on climate change.

The evidence for AGW is not good but global warming alarmists are supremely confident in their conclusions.

Global warming alarmists (many of them the same who predicted a New Ice Age in the 1970s) ignore, or evade, such awkward facts as the greatly increased CO2 production worldwide for 30 years after 1941, when heavy industry increased immensely for armaments in WWII, and for rebuilding and consumer goods like cars in the postwar boom in the Americas, Europe and Asia — while global temperatures simultaneously fell.