The chart starts in 1988 (5 - years ending 1988) when NASA's chief global
warming alarmist predicted (at a U.S. Senate hearing) that the U.S. would also suffer from the global warming trend with dire consequences.
In other words, the more we learn the more we see that everything is unusual compared to what the global
warming alarmists predict.
Not exact matches
So the
alarmist community has reacted predictably by issuing ever more apocalyptic statements, like the federal report» Global Change Impacts in the United States» issued last week which
predicts more frequent heat waves, rising water temperatures, more wildfires, rising disease levels, and rising sea levels — headlined, in a paper I read, as «Getting
Warmer.»
In reality, no climate models
predict any probability of
warming over 10 C. Of all the
alarmist lies, this one takes the first prize hands down.
Whether it's
warmer or colder, wetter or drier, more ice or less, more storms or fewer storms, «It's exactly what we
predicted,» climate
alarmists say.
The bad news is that as more is understood about global
warming, and as we compare what has happened to what was
predicted by the average models (from the actual science, not from popular sensationalized media), the earlier scientific predictions have turned out to be too conservative, not as you say «too
alarmist».
Given the preponderance of
alarmist climate models that
predicted significant
warming, this fact alone should be reason enough for regulators and scientists to reassess their conclusions.
The
alarmist camp is
predicting such a resumption of
warming.
Global
warming alarmists (many of them the same who
predicted a New Ice Age in the 1970s) ignore, or evade, such awkward facts as the greatly increased CO2 production worldwide for 30 years after 1941, when heavy industry increased immensely for armaments in WWII, and for rebuilding and consumer goods like cars in the postwar boom in the Americas, Europe and Asia — while global temperatures simultaneously fell.
Meanwhile, the NOAA report shows that climate
alarmists (and NOAA belongs in this category) are still, as the Climategate emails revealed very clearly, willing to lie with statistics to get the
warming the models
predict.
My criticism of this site and many others is that, in an overreaction to the
alarmists» obsession with
predicting and controlling the future, most sceptics refuse to speculate on how the politics of global
warming will develop, and just assume that the truth will out, that the Emperor's nakedness will become evident, and we can all go back to leading normal lives.
Alarmists, embarrassed by the earth's refusal to
warm as their models
predict, have concocted all sorts of scary stories about «
warming in the pipeline,» etc..
Also in 2009, meanwhile, the
alarmist Met Office
predicted that three of the next five years would set new world records for
warming.
The UN's IPCC and associated climate
alarmist scientists
predicted that severe weather would increase globally as a result of human - caused global
warming.
For example,
alarmists claim that even if the air and oceans aren't
warming as
predicted, the
warming is only being «masked,» or that we are just experiencing a «plateau» or a «pause» in
warming — this often at the same time as they have asserted that
warming was «accelerating.»
(Part of the How to Talk to a Global
Warming Skeptic guide) Objection: The
alarmists were
predicting the onset of an ice age in the»70s.
As has been well documented, the IPCC, AGW scientists and
alarmist politicians have
predicted the global
warming will cause the spread of malaria infections.
Global
warming alarmists and IPCC scientists
predicted that malaria would spread across the world as global
warming occurred.
Global
warming alarmists and IPCC Climategate scientists
predict all sorts of evil doings because of increased temperatures.