Sentences with phrase «warming alarmist scientist»

My response is we are being told by Al Gore and James Hansen (NASA global warming alarmist scientist) that the problem is worse than the IPCC (United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and the scientists feared.

Now compound this massive propaganda failure by the anti-growth Democrats with this week's latest climate science news from the world's premier science journal and a leading global warming alarmist scientist: natural ocean oscillations are responsible for Earth's modern temperature changes, not human CO2.

Not exact matches

Scientists and others who hope to inform the public or spur action have long struggled with how to convey the high stakes of global warming without making people feel helpless or fueling deniers by coming across as alarmist.

Then it ends by quoting Winston Churchill in a way that's meant to group the furthest - out global - warming alarmist with the likes of RC and other responsible scientists: «A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.»

Anyone interested in the present and recent RealClimate postings will likely want to visit the Wall Street Journal's OpinionJournal.com today, where there's a link to an op - ed by MIT's Richard Lindzen that's headlined this way: «FREE INQUIRY: Climate of Fear: Global - warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence.»

Skeptics have long cited Doran's research to show that global warming is a flawed theory motivated by alarmist scientists more interested in scaring up huge research grants than in pursuing the evidence with honesty and integrity.

... Climate of Fear — Global - warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence.

However keen you may be to demonstrate my arguments are misleading, I am afraid to report I am simply a scientist who feels stongly about protecting our natural environment, and who agrees global warming is a potential risk, but yet who remains unconvinced by the generally alarmist claims that the end of the world is nigh.

Regarding the issue of whether some «mainstream» scientists are «alarmist» in their discussions of global warming, it is well to remember that, in any controversy, scientific or otherwise, there will be extremists at both ends of the spectrum.

«Global warming believers are like a hysterical «cult»: MIT scientist compares «climate alarmists» to religious fanatics,» Daily Mail Online, January 22, 2015.

Your and all your other fellow climate alarmists provide evidence that these observations of eminent scientists is correct, because none of you can cite any peer reviewed science that empirically falsifies the null climate hypothesis of natural variability still being the primary cause of climate change, or cite any peer reviewed science that empirically shows that anthropogenic CO2 has been the primary cause of the late 20th century climate warming.

Observe how the global warming alarmists, scientists and politicians alike, are gradually preparing their exit routes, after decades of false scaremongering and fraudulent misappropriation of scarce global resources on a fabricated, non-existent crisis.

The relationship is not perfect but it represents a significant improvement over the incredibly lame human - CO2 and global warming / climate change relationship claimed by the IPCC's anti-CO2 Climategate scientists and alarmists.

Given the preponderance of alarmist climate models that predicted significant warming, this fact alone should be reason enough for regulators and scientists to reassess their conclusions.

Though the paper's findings are not controversial — few serious scientists dispute the evidence of the temperature datasets showing that there has been little if any global warming for nearly 19 years — they represent a tremendous blow to the climate alarmist «consensus», which has long sought to deny the «Pause's» existence.

«Since its creation in 2006 the site has done nothing but post poorly researched propaganda with a clear intent to smear respected scientists, policy analysts or groups who dare oppose an alarmist position on global warming.

Many climate alarmists claim 97 percent or more climate scientists state carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is causing global warming.

NCSE isn't composed of scientists or science teachers; it's an activist group devoted, in part, to expounding global warming alarmists» dogma: Humans are causing climate change; the results will be catastrophic; and governments must force people to use less energy and live simpler to prevent future disasters.

Gray criticized NASA scientist and global warming alarmist James Hansen, calling him «the most egregious abuser» of data.

It is such whacko prognostications that should make every scientist very skeptical of the good intentions of global warming alarmists.

Climate alarmist scientists speculated that global warming from human CO2 emissions would somehow cause the El Niño / La Niña climate cycle to become stuck in the El Niño mode.

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

Since the «runaway» and «accelerating» scenarios have been ginormous scientific failures, as previously discussed, AGW scientists and alarmists / advocates are having to seriously re-think the basic assumptions of catastrophic global warming.

That shock will be felt most especially by the world's climate alarmist Establishment, whose scientists and learned institutions have staked their reputation on the idea that CO2, not solar activity, is the prime driver of climate and that the planet is on a warming trend not a cooling one.

Note 3: The catastrophic global warming alarmists, be they «scientists» or political hacks, are very alarmed that the «hotspot» never materialized.

[O] ne possible reason why scientists may have underestimated the threat of anthropogenic warming is the fear that if they don't, they will be accused by contrarians (as was Schneider) of being alarmist fear - mongers.

The UN's IPCC and associated climate alarmist scientists predicted that severe weather would increase globally as a result of human - caused global warming.

Global warming alarmists... scientists... shamans, are the «anti-science» flat - earthers of the modern era.

And so, over the decade, alarmist climate scientists tried to fool the public by stonewalling («it's the warmest decade on record,» which doesn't mean the decade was warming), denying the facts («the allegation that annual global mean temperatures stopped increasing during the past decade has no basis in reality»), or outright lying («the world is warming even more quickly than we had thought»).

Please, provide a plot of the number of scientists who dare speak against global warming alarmists vs. year, with the source.

The climate will eventually warm again — «stable» climate is an alarmist myth — and alarmist climate scientists will no doubt beat their doomsday drums even harder, while continuing to exaggerate the facts in what they tell the public to win support for the CAGW hypothesis.

In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimaScientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climascientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The plan by climate alarmists to have other scientists imprisoned for their «global warming» skepticism is backfiring horribly, and the chief alarmist is now facing a House investigation into what has been called «the largest science scandal in US history.»

Nick Stokes Blue Team = IPCC / Climate Alarmists (aka Climate Scientists)-- advocating Catastrophic majority Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW).

WARMING alarmists rebut the 1970's global cooling scare with claims that the phenomenon wasn't «peer - reviewed» or that a «consensus» of «97 %» of «scientists» didn't agree.

2) In spite of the title of this email, I'm well aware — as are those who read this blog — that global warming alarmists have been exposed as fearmongering chicken little liars (not to mention hypocrites) for decades, but rarely has it been on a level where you actually have «scientists» and their associates caught on paper attempting to suppress data that is contra to their pre-desired result.

Like so many alarmists, any climate scientist who has suggested CO2 warming has been detrimental to wildlife becomes «Precious» to Miesler.

Again proving that alarmist science is based on scientific untruths, speculation and hype, two new studies confirm what objective scientists have actually observed: recent past global warming is not causing an increase on severe storms.

«Climate Scientists: There Is A New»Cause» For The «Pause» of Global Warming Main Totalitarian Greens: National Science Foundation funds psychological warfare manifesto for climate alarmists»

Environmentalists either know «warmer is better» and seek to hide this inconvenient truth from the public, or the only research they've done is reading the fundraising letters of silly alarmist groups such as Greenpeace and Union of Concerned Scientists.

We've all heard from the climate alarmist scientists that global warming is «accelerating» but is it really?

Though the book covers much of the same ground, albeit at a lower reading level, as Al Gore's famous global warming presentation, it is never alarmist, and instead focuses on the grounded evidence for global climate change and the collective efforts of many different kinds of scientists.

«A favourite ploy by [Anthropogenic Global Warming] alarmists is to repeat ad infinitem that the science about AGW has been settled and that there is consensus among scientists that it is happening and that it will have cataclysmic consequences for our planet,» writes Gerrit J. van der Lingen in the National Business Review.

Global warming «skeptics» — scientists and others who question whether the scientific debate is truly settled and ask for real data to support the claims of the alarmists — are frequently attacked in the press, by politicians (including President Barack Obama), and on countless blogs and Web sites.

As has been well documented, the IPCC, AGW scientists and alarmist politicians have predicted the global warming will cause the spread of malaria infections.

In a peer - reviewed study, scientists have determined that global warming is not the culprit - AGW alarmists are blue as a result.

Global warming alarmists and IPCC scientists predicted that malaria would spread across the world as global warming occurred.

Did climate alarmist scientists» greed siphon away needed funds from much more important, critical science and practical solutions for solving non-global warming deaths?

Global warming alarmists and IPCC Climategate scientists predict all sorts of evil doings because of increased temperatures.

«MSM - Caused Confusion: They Confuse «Global Warming» With «Climate Change» - As Top Climate Scientist Explains, They're Not The Same Main Are Climate Alarmist Scientists Guilty For Deaths of Millions?