We know from the geophysical record of the Earth that global
warming alarmists deny that most of the Earth's history has been spent locked in ice miles thick.
Wagathon August 13, 2012 at 10:18 pm complained:» that global
warming alarmists deny that most of the Earth's history has been spent locked in ice miles thick.
Not exact matches
Scientists and others who hope to inform the public or spur action have long struggled with how to convey the high stakes of global
warming without making people feel helpless or fueling
deniers by coming across as
alarmist.
So I take it that the consensus view is that according to our best current scientific understanding, there is no possibility whatsoever of any catastrophic consequences of anthropogenic global
warming; therefore to use the word «catastrophic» is irresponsible alarmism;, and therefore the
deniers are actually quite right to accuse anyone who suggests that such outcomes are possible of being an irresponsible
alarmist.
As a «rate this comment» feature, you should have a thermometer graphic, that ranges on the scale of frigid (
denier) to cold (skeptic) to
warm (believer) to hot (
alarmist).
You climate
alarmists are the
deniers,
denying the fact that the empirical data shows that natural climate variability is still the primary cause of climate
warming.
Though the paper's findings are not controversial — few serious scientists dispute the evidence of the temperature datasets showing that there has been little if any global
warming for nearly 19 years — they represent a tremendous blow to the climate
alarmist «consensus», which has long sought to
deny the «Pause's» existence.
«When it comes to global
warming, most people think there are two camps:
alarmist or
denier being their respective pejoratives.
'' Global
warming alarmists are the equivalent of the flat - Earthers... you know it used to be it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a
denier,»
But yet the language of the global
warming alarmist, is to accuse anyone who does not believe in man - made climate change as a «
denier», a heretic, a blasphemer.
And so, over the decade,
alarmist climate scientists tried to fool the public by stonewalling («it's the
warmest decade on record,» which doesn't mean the decade was
warming),
denying the facts («the allegation that annual global mean temperatures stopped increasing during the past decade has no basis in reality»), or outright lying («the world is
warming even more quickly than we had thought»).
His critique was, however, widely misrepresented by climate
deniers as proving that the IPCC's scientific verdict about the dangers of global
warming are too
alarmist.
CLIMATE change
alarmists conveniently «
deny» the existence of the 1970's «global cooling» scare because such panic, a mere 40 years ago, threatens the legitimacy of the current «global
warming» scare.
This edition has been revised and reformulated with a new chapter template of short chapter introductions, study questions at... View Details Global
Warming -
Alarmists, Skeptics and
Deniers: A Geoscientist Looks at the Science of Climate Change by G. Dedrick Robinson (Author), Gene D. Robinson III (Author) Global
Warming -
Alarmists, Skeptics &
Deniers: A Geoscientist looks at the Science of Climate Change, brings a unique geological perspective to this politically charged issue, a perspective that has been ignored far too long.
Likewise, for global
warming, the media sorts people into «
alarmist» or «
denier» camps — words needing little further explication.
Imagine the uproar if the phrase «global
warming denier» made its way into a textbook for students, as the term «global
warming alarmist», used to describe rather mainstream scientific views, is prevalent in Rapp's silly book.
Science -
denying, consensus - fabricating global
warming alarmists are a generation of the most short - sighted hypocritical idiots in the history of this country.
After becoming fed up with the childish and dangerous tactics of
alarmists, particularly the use of the term «climate
denier,» Spencer said that the «global -
warming Nazis» were in fact threatening millions of lives — especially among the poor — with their «pseudo-scientific ramblings» and support for fascist - style «radical policies» supposedly aimed at combating «global
warming.»