But the problem with global
warming alarmists getting on their science high horse is that they don't really know the science all that well, or how to talk about it.
As a result, global
warming alarmists get a pass on claiming to be helping the poor by fighting global warming.
Not exact matches
So the
alarmist community has reacted predictably by issuing ever more apocalyptic statements, like the federal report» Global Change Impacts in the United States» issued last week which predicts more frequent heat waves, rising water temperatures, more wildfires, rising disease levels, and rising sea levels — headlined, in a paper I read, as «
Getting Warmer.»
In our present context, this Simonian pattern is evident in the decline in mortality rates from heat in the United States, even though (as the climate
alarmists tell us repeatedly) the U.S. has
gotten warmer since industrialization.
The message I'm taking away from this is that if you are a Global
Warming Alarmist you can grope women to your heart's content and
get away with it.
«The failure of the public to
get unduly alarmed over a degree or two of
warming has led the environmental
alarmists to turn to the bogey man of extreme weather.»
Brazil is
getting a good chuckle at all of the global
warming alarmists of the secular, socialist Big Government Education Complex in America.
You can be the biggest, most risible assclown in the history of junk statistics and pseudoscience but so long as you can somehow cobble together a half - way plausible paper, no matter how inept your methodology, which helps prop up the vast man - made global
warming industry then you have it made: the President of the USA will Tweet you; your University will back you to the hilt; your colleagues will rally round you; you will
get a very favourable write - up in the Guardian (and myriad other
alarmist publications); your critics will be sidelined and ignored.
Don't
get me wrong, I don't buy into the AGW
alarmist story that we are anywhere near a tipping point or even that human CO2 and land use activities are responsible for most of the
warming we have experienced in the past 150 years.
Meanwhile, the NOAA report shows that climate
alarmists (and NOAA belongs in this category) are still, as the Climategate emails revealed very clearly, willing to lie with statistics to
get the
warming the models predict.
As a consequence of the towering example AGW True Believers bring to high science of approximating reality let us enumerate a sufficient example of their inability and fundamental inadequacy on the numerous occasions afforded them from the inception of their undertaking to effectuate an adequate understanding of the issues to be ascertained: The Global
Warming Alarmists Still Don't
Get It: It's The Sun, Stupid.
While global
warming alarmists continue to fantasize crude oil use
getting drastically reduced already starting next year, OPEC sees it totally differently.
Unfortunately the global
warming alarmists have done just that and
gotten away with it until Climategate.
«To Gavin [Schmidt] and the other
alarmists, it appears, a piece that is fair and balanced can make no mention of any other opinion except that carbon dioxide is causing global
warming and action is needed now and will deliver gain and no pain, something the one sided media coverage has
gotten them used to over the years,» D'Aleo wrote on January 13, 2009.
The top French weatherman who was sacked from his state broadcaster for speaking inconvenient truths about the non-existence of «man - made - global -
warming» has taken exquisite revenge on the
alarmist establishment: now he's
got a new job broadcasting from the Kremlin's propaganda arm, pouring
Disagree Brandon,
getting everyone to agree humans have caused around half of the
warming was a coup for the
alarmists, because we have no idea whatsoever who has created what
warming
But in bending over backwards to make sure that no one
gets the silly idea, on the evidence of a single datapoint, that global
warming has stopped, they open the door to
alarmist nonsense every time they update their graphs.
That's how we
got here in the first place, with the global
warming alarmists convincing low information voters that we should be switching to non-existent alternative energy sources, and the same process is still rolling along at full speed.
In the meantime though we've
got to work on the problem of global
warming alarmists being paid by the rest of us to do nothing more than gnash their teeth in the ivory towers.
So besides worrying about the less important and less likely possible temperature change (global
warming), the
alarmists have
gotten their science backwards.
Toni Massari @ 201, You
get responses up - thread that pretty - much go not further than call your referenced piece in Forbes «To The Horror Of Global
Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling Is Here» out - of - date (from 2013) and denialist clap - trap.
Thus, each unbound di - bound gas composing over 96 % of the raw atmosphere
gets ignored by global
warming alarmists as if these two gasses are completely irrelevant to the global A: $ kv.
«Average winter snow extent during the past decade was greater than the 1960s by about 70,000 km2» which only goes to proove (switching to
Alarmist mode) that it is
getting warmer.
What we will find is that, extrapolating from history, it is almost impossible to
get warming numbers as high as those quoted by global
warming alarmists.