Sentences with phrase «warming alarmists like»

Like reading tea leaves or making a journey to the Oracle of Delphi, academia's belief that they can represent physical processes in the atmosphere, ocean, land and poles some 50 to 100 years into the future — and, the Delphic pronouncements of Western global warming alarmists like Gore, Hansen, Mann, Alley, etc. — all have taken on an air of the macabre.

It's funny because the global warming alarmists like to take whatever the current conditions are and paint a picture that makes AGW the reason for whatever is happening.

Warming alarmists like to talk about us pumping BILLION OF TONS OF CO2 into the atmosphere, because big numbers sound scary.

The worst outcome for gobal warming alarmists like Chad Blair who deal in blatant lies, to push their agenda, is being guilty of an excess of virtue.

Since the end of the last ice age, Pacific Island atolls have survived 130 metres of sea - level rise, but global warming alarmists like Mark Kenny think that the last 1.43 mm / year since 1950 is going to sink them, therefore, compensation must be paid for by Western nations.

The 47,000 wildfires last year may seem like a very large number — and it certainly gives global warming alarmists like Brown plenty of fodder for misleading global warming claims — but the 47,000 wildfires was less than half the average number of wildfires that occurred each year in the 1960s and 1970s.

Not exact matches

Global warming alarmists have something like Gadaffi's initial air superiority over rag - tag opponents in Libya.

So the alarmist community has reacted predictably by issuing ever more apocalyptic statements, like the federal report» Global Change Impacts in the United States» issued last week which predicts more frequent heat waves, rising water temperatures, more wildfires, rising disease levels, and rising sea levels — headlined, in a paper I read, as «Getting Warmer.»

Then it ends by quoting Winston Churchill in a way that's meant to group the furthest - out global - warming alarmist with the likes of RC and other responsible scientists: «A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.»

«Global warming believers are like a hysterical «cult»: MIT scientist compares «climate alarmists» to religious fanatics,» Daily Mail Online, January 22, 2015.

But you can NOT support your claims with empirical data, because just as I pointed out, and you have failed to refute, there isn't a single peer reviewed paper that empirically shows that anthropogenic CO2 was the primary cause of the late 20th century warming like your climate alarmist religion claims.

That information like this was not widely known until recently was, in part, a testament to the effectiveness of the global warming alarmists in suppressing the publication of dissenting opinion.

Like Greenland and the Little Ice Age, glaciers aren't cooperating with climate alarmists either, though glacier retreat is supposedly a harbinger of doom for our warming planet.

Michael Crichton had a big problem with these global warming alarmists who don't really seem to like people much, whether at home or around the globe — e.g.,

Like all databases in the hands of confirmed alarmists any changes always cool the past and warm the present.

National Geographic, like other choristers in the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) alarmist choir, is hyping the latest «climate research,» in this case, the new computer modeling program of a team at the University College of London's (UCL) Institute for Sustainable Resources.

The reason it disappeared wasn't due to rising sea - levels from global warming as the «alarmists» would like you to believe.

Purposes of the messages will be to challenge the alarmist position on atmospheric warming, educate the public on actual climate behaviour and force supporters the likes of Al Gore into an open debate.

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

Global warming alarmists (many of them the same who predicted a New Ice Age in the 1970s) ignore, or evade, such awkward facts as the greatly increased CO2 production worldwide for 30 years after 1941, when heavy industry increased immensely for armaments in WWII, and for rebuilding and consumer goods like cars in the postwar boom in the Americas, Europe and Asia — while global temperatures simultaneously fell.

The NY Times and Al Gore will not like this, but it is better to fight it out on the basis of the alarmists» invalid science rather than the moral wisdom of their alleged attempt to «save the world» from imaginary global warming / climate change due to human - caused CO2 emissions.

Yet the alarmists insist the warming will cause a result like a mini ice age.

I was very skeptical of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (though not the possibility of some AGW) from the moment I heard about it as a major political movement, because it «smelled» to much like the Alarmist «Population Bomb» and «Peek Oil» movements, and was being pushed by many of the same kind of people.

Global Warmimg alarmists like, Tim Flannery, assured us that global warming would bring us a «new era» of climate — droughts, famine and pestilence etc etc..

So, global warming alarmists communicators like David Holmes tell us not to worry about 1,950 nukes per second, but for sure the 1,950 + 4 bombs are the «for sure» climate killer.

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

I know NOAA says the decade saw warming of.2 °C, but it's fairly obvious that this number was a result of some major «adjustments» to the models, given that, as noted in the blog above, everyone, including major climate alarmists like Phil Jones and Tim Flannery, had accepted that the planet did not warm, on average, for the decade.

The alarmists at the IPCC and «Big Green» like to point to the gigantic icebergs produced by Antarctica as proof that global warming is directly melting the polar continent with high temperatures.

Renaming global warming to a concern about climate change and adding a few adjectives when that didn't work — like disastrous and calamitous climate change — hasn't worked out so well for the global alarmists.

But suggesting no climate doom for Emperor Penguins threatened Mielser's «precious» beliefs and like so many alarmists, Miesler refuses to accept any documented facts that «global warming» is neither global nor harmful.

Like so many alarmists, any climate scientist who has suggested CO2 warming has been detrimental to wildlife becomes «Precious» to Miesler.

Dr. Hansen, along with a number of other climate change alarmists (like Al Gore), believes that man is the chief cause of global warming, and that warming is generally harmful.

Global warming alarmists are like the wizard of Oz, asking the public fear the spectacle, but not to pull back the curtain and unmask them for the charlatans they are.

Alarmists want to fight the war over whether the greenhouse gas effect of CO2 is true and whether the world has seen warming over the last century, both propositions that skeptics like myself accept.

«It's interesting that the global warming alarmists, like many other phenomena of the political left, believe that the way to win a debate is to silence the opposition.

And if warming comes back round, the alarmists can just party again like it was 2007.

Governments, political parties, AGW alarmists, «green» industries, celebrities, mainstream media news outlets, TV networks like NBC, special interest groups — all of these close - knit groups have both personal and professional vested interests in keeping the myth of «man - made» global warming alive, and suffice it to say that they will work hard to «contain» this scandal.

No warming here, nothing to see, please go home, nothing «unprecedented» going on like the «alarmist warmers» would have you believe, just more global warming fraud.

(1) Alarmists: Like «Chicken Little» who cried «the sky is falling» when he was hit by an acorn falling off a tree, the Alarmists think they are warning and saving the world from a «tipping point» that will cause «runaway warming» within a decade or so because of the coincidence of a warming trend and CO2 rise over the past century.

But nothing like the catastrophe we have been led to believe, with many alarmists claiming there would be an ice - free arctic last summer due to global warming (in fact, much of the big decline in 2007 was due to changes in wind patterns, not temperature).