Sentences with phrase «warming alarmists say»

«Many global warming alarmists say that vast stretches of coastline are going to be swallowed up by the sea.

Not exact matches

Dr. Richard Lindzen — Professor of Meteorology at M.I.T., member, the National Research Council Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, says global warming alarmists «are trumpeting catastrophes that couldn't happen even if the models were right.»

«Your efforts have gone a long way to stop the global warming alarmist agenda,» he said.

Whether it's warmer or colder, wetter or drier, more ice or less, more storms or fewer storms, «It's exactly what we predicted,» climate alarmists say.

Here is what I actually said: ``... the climate alarmists maintain that Africa is already experiencing natural disasters — principally floods, droughts, malaria and other diseases, arising from unnatural global warming, and that these are causing increases in poverty, malnutrition, disease and environmental damage.

Nope that is not what the global warming alarmists are saying.

That essentially is what Dr. Tim Ball was saying when he took heat for comparing the tactics of global warming alarmists to those of Nadolf Nitler.

The bad news is that as more is understood about global warming, and as we compare what has happened to what was predicted by the average models (from the actual science, not from popular sensationalized media), the earlier scientific predictions have turned out to be too conservative, not as you say «too alarmist».

If you're not a global warming geek, the point of the material is that we have apparent — and I only say apparent at this point — written admissions of cooking the books, among other nastiness, by the leading names in the global warming alarmist movement.

«I've seen Al Gore's film twice, but I've also read Michael Crichton's State of Fear, which makes a compelling case on the other side,» says Hug, referring to the controversial 2004 novel in which Crichton — using scientific arguments that were hotly challenged by critics — ridiculed the global - warming consensus as the work of conspiratorial alarmists.

«We should be growing more trees and using more wood,» says Moore, but the global warming alarmists refer to the forests as «carbon stocks» that must not be used.

Commenting on the latest deception surrounding the «warmest on record» claim, Spencer said that even science itself was under assault by the politically driven warming alarmists.

Well, ANU, snarky though you may be, you raise a nominally interesting point; the problem, however, is that the amounts are anomalies; so the 90's are on average a certain amount above the average of the base period; now to compare the increase in anomalies in the noughties, which are higher than the nineties and say this is evidence of progressive warming, hottest ever, or whatever is the current alarmist catch - cry, ignores the fact that the true measure of the warming is not the absolute anomalies but their difference; that is the amounts for the noughties should have the amounts for the nineties subtracted from them and then compared with the nineties after they have the eighties subtracted from them.

Unfortunately for said alarmists, the empirical evidence completely undercuts claims that warming causes bad weather - essentially, the claims are all hype for several reasons.

««Alarmist» Global Warming Claims Unfounded Says Climatolgist,» CNSNews.com, July 14, 2003.

I know NOAA says the decade saw warming of.2 °C, but it's fairly obvious that this number was a result of some major «adjustments» to the models, given that, as noted in the blog above, everyone, including major climate alarmists like Phil Jones and Tim Flannery, had accepted that the planet did not warm, on average, for the decade.

Remember that «pause» is the politically correct term coined by alarmists so they didn't have to say «lack of statistically significant warming», which was the original accusation leveled by sceptics.

«Alarmists» are wrong when they say that the» pause in global warming» has ended — the recent warming was just due to an El Nino» vs. «There has been a pause in warming since 1998.»

If we had said to Hanson in 1988 come back in 2008 (ie the thirty years alarmists say is necessary to confirm a trend) we could now have patted him on the head and said «Don't worry Jim satellite data shows that it is no warmer now than when you raised the matter in 1988!»

And I assume the Sierra Club would issue a public retraction if confronted with the facts that the data are precisely as I described that over the last 18 years there has been no significant warming and indeed that is why global warming alarmists invented the term «the pause» to explain what they called the pause in global warming because the data demonstrate what you just said, that the Earth is cooking and warming, is not back up by the data.

50 - 50 in this context would be that alarmists now are willing to say — e.g.,... it's even money we're wrong to believe all global warming since 1950 is mostly caused by human activity.

James Lovelock calls his own projections «alarmist» and says warming hasn't met expectations.

Governments, political parties, AGW alarmists, «green» industries, celebrities, mainstream media news outlets, TV networks like NBC, special interest groups — all of these close - knit groups have both personal and professional vested interests in keeping the myth of «man - made» global warming alive, and suffice it to say that they will work hard to «contain» this scandal.

The alarmists are half aware of the potential negative influence of convection, clouds, evaporation, condensation and rainfall because they say that a warmer Earth will have more and / or bigger storms.

Around the capital, there was a flurry of debates, Senate speeches, inflammatory editorials and talk - show commentaries, some contending that global warming was an alarmist fantasy and others saying action was essential.

Speaking to Andrew Bolt on Sky News» The Bolt Report, Professor Ridd says you can't trust alarmist scientists who claim the Great Barrier Reef is dying, thanks to man - made warming.

As more and more scientists defect from the crumbling alarmist bandwagon, however, critics say the hysterical shrieking and dangerous rhetoric from politicians only serve to further illustrate the accelerating collapse of what many climate experts refer to as the «global - warming hoax.»

After becoming fed up with the childish and dangerous tactics of alarmists, particularly the use of the term «climate denier,» Spencer said that the «global - warming Nazis» were in fact threatening millions of lives — especially among the poor — with their «pseudo-scientific ramblings» and support for fascist - style «radical policies» supposedly aimed at combating «global warming.»

Instead of publicly expressing their views, a group of parliamentarians said skeptics should parrot the imploding official narrative: The notion that global warming, which even leading alarmists admit has been on «pause» for 17 years in defiance of every UN climate model, is caused by human activities and requires planetary carbon taxes and more government control.