Sentences with phrase «warming argument»

The lack of good alternatives has caused some people to make global warming an argument for increasing our reliance on nuclear power.

Gas is far better than coal (less CO2 / energy delivered, less other pollution), and it is interesting to see them promoting it versus coal with global warming arguments.

We could also insist on the mode of atmospheric circulation as described by Marcel Leroux demonstrating the fallacy of the Global warming argument through the understanding of meteorological data.

As global warming argument moves on to politics and business, Alan Rusbridger explains the thinking behind our major series on the climate crisis

This whole argument is just one big RED HERRING in the context of the scientific consensus that humans are influencing the climate and making it warmer

Then thereâ $ ™ s the pesky issue of â $ œconsensus.â $ Alarmists typically counter any fact - based global warming argument with the assertion that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has already ruled on the issue, and therefore â $ œthe science is settledâ $ and â $ œthe debate is over.â $ â $ œMild winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms, â $ IPCC claimed in its 2001 Third Assessment.

This argument is a microcosym of the larger global warming argument, i.e. certain reports can not be believed because of the author's viewpoint.

You don't need to buy into the global warming argument to know that we very often engage in activities that destroy the environment.

There are other highly uncertain topics such as hurricanes and global warming and cloud / aerosol feedbacks, that are arguably more important for the global warming argument than the paleo reconstructions.

In his open letter to Martin Durkin's Wag TV, one of Five major misrepresentations of the scientific evidence in the film concerned Durkin's suggestion that the global temperature slump in the 1950s and»60s, which was concurrent with rising emissions of greenhouse gases, was problematic for orthodox global warming arguments.

I guess since the only response possible to Monckton's searing global warming arguments are these «personal attacks», he automatically wins every climate debate from now on.

Yet we've listened only to the prosecution side of the global warming argument.

Their report suggests that a central plank in the global warming argument — that it will result in a big increase in deaths from weather - related disasters — is undermined by the facts.

Leg 2, however, is very problematic and is by far the weakest part of the global warming argument.

They aren't trying to persuade, they are, like global warming argument - recyclers, trying to discourage.

The parallel sources to these in the global warming argument are the 19,000 scientists who signed the OISM petition that human expulsion of CO2 is not harmful.

The same arguments that surrounded that argument also encompass the global warming argument.

Anyway, as a result of these flaws, and again having little to do with the global warming argument itself, the Senate voted 95 - 0 in 1997 not to sign or ratify the treaty unless these flaws (which still exist in the treaty) were fixed.