Similar to other talking points from the Al Gore side of the issue (e.g. the «tobacco industry parallel,» and the «inconsistent statements» notion), the bit about influential climate deniers having «a big megaphone» is a single - serving talking point, meant to be swallowed without question by the general public and regurgitated instantly by global
warming believers when the need arises.
And when was scientific truth determined by a vote... especially when those allowed to vote are from the Global
Warming Believers Party?
Global
warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other words.
By Andrew Bolt Global
warming believers told us this year to look at the Arctic — and heed the awesome lesson.
You need to take the carbon quiz to learn a few basics especially if you are a global
warming believer because all science necessarily requires informed skepticism to counterbalance anything that starts becoming theoretical consensus which happens to be a political term not a scientific one.
Global
warming believers across the board trust that the «industry - corrupted skeptic climate scientists» accusation has evidence to back it up, trusting in the notion that their leaders speak with authority about it being exposed by a «Pulitzer Prize - winning investigative journalist.»
After that, the public — the people who will be paying the huge climate bills that the scientists would like us to pay — can make an informed opinion based on a range of facts, not just those that the human -
caused warming believers wish us to know.
Knowing what I know on specific details of the accusation, it didn't surprise me when global
warming believers ducked my questions and lashed out at me instead, or in the case of blog site owners, deleted my comments after brief appearances or prevented them from being seen in the first place.
Since I've been labeled an «investigative journalist», I'll briefly dispute it, and then describe how no less than Democrat New York Senator and global
warming believer Chuck Schumer says people like me are journalists.
Beck's group is small compared to Al Gore's global
warming believers and the «Barack My World» group during the last USA presidential election.
He has compared «global
warming believers» to a «cult,» and called the most recent assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world's leading climate science body, «a political document.»
But I have no doubt Global
Warming believers, the corporations and NGO's that profit off them, and the politicians that cater to them would be exclaiming the planet is going to die if these problems were caused by record heat and not record cold.
As I've said on several occasions here and elsewhere, the major problem with global
warming believers» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase is that it is not in any way proof of an arrangement between between skeptics and industry officials involving payments made for false climate assessments.
A timeline of where, how and when that «reposition global warming» phrase first showed up is something global
warming believers would hate, since it might prompt a total loss of faith in the validity of that central accusation point.
A farmer toiling on the land who is a climate sceptic then turns into a global
warming believer is based first hand observational rather then ivory tower commentary on our past.
Pentti Linkola, a Finnish global -
warming believer, summarizes the views of many environmentalists: «The difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter is a matter of perspective: it all depends on the observer and the verdict of history.»
Ray: I thought so too until I started engaging global
warming believers.
I concluded my comment pointing out how global
warming believers» misinformation tactic only undermines their cause.
We got ta show the world, What NOAA's trying to hide, These Global -
warming believers Are taking us for a ride.
Of course, this obsession with credentials evaporates when it comes to global -
warming believers.
Surprisingly, it is St. Thomas Aquinas who tells us that science and faith must agree or faith must yield (Anthropogenic
Warming believers should read Chesterton's book on Aquinas and note the astonishing ironic criticism about taking action before knowing what to do coming from, of all places, the Middle ages.)
Of the global
warming believers, the majority also reported thinking that the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities play a role.
Plus, some amount of my time goes toward dropping into hard - core global
warming believers» sites, ultimately to live rent - free in those bloggers (plural, I should note) / commenters» minds.
Phrases with «warming believers»