Global
warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other words.
Not exact matches
People who are strong
believers in global
warming and in protecting the environment
need to lead by example.
«ooooooh maaaaaaaaan I
need my car I mean I'll sit here and debate global
warming with these idiot non
believers but at the end of the day me not using my car won't save the earth sooooooooooo......»
Similar to other talking points from the Al Gore side of the issue (e.g. the «tobacco industry parallel,» and the «inconsistent statements» notion), the bit about influential climate deniers having «a big megaphone» is a single - serving talking point, meant to be swallowed without question by the general public and regurgitated instantly by global
warming believers when the
need arises.
No
need to worry all you global
warming believers.
You
need to take the carbon quiz to learn a few basics especially if you are a global
warming believer because all science necessarily requires informed skepticism to counterbalance anything that starts becoming theoretical consensus which happens to be a political term not a scientific one.
If you get beyond the hard core of near religious
believers in the massive
warming scenarios, the average global
warming supporter would answer this paper by saying: «Yes there is a lot of uncertainty, but though the doomsday
warming scenarios via runaway positive feedback in the climate can't be proven, they are so bad that we
need to cut back on CO2 production just to be on the safe side.»