Sentences with phrase «warming believers when»

Similar to other talking points from the Al Gore side of the issue (e.g. the «tobacco industry parallel,» and the «inconsistent statements» notion), the bit about influential climate deniers having «a big megaphone» is a single - serving talking point, meant to be swallowed without question by the general public and regurgitated instantly by global warming believers when the need arises.

Not exact matches

You believers can keep on being good little hypocrites by doing all the things you waive your lily white fingers at others when they do it, then get «absolved» on Dou che bag day, then feel warm and fuzzy knowing that your imaginary friend will still let you into heaven.

They keep yapping about «thousands of scientists» contributing to the IPCC AR4, when in fact the Summary for Policymakers was written by a small coterie of believers in a strong effect of CO2 on global warming.

When you say «believers,» are you thinking of all people who believe global warming is a serious threat, or are you intentionally trying to refer to a specific segment of that group?

A timeline of where, how and when that «reposition global warming» phrase first showed up is something global warming believers would hate, since it might prompt a total loss of faith in the validity of that central accusation point.

Why do global - warming believers keep pushing this everyone - agrees line when consensus uber alles is so, well, unacademic?

But when increasing numbers of the public become aware of how NY state AG Schneiderman and Al Gore handed their heads on a silver platter two weeks ago to investigators, journalists, and wavering global warming believers, the more likely this entire witch hunt collapses.

Of course, this obsession with credentials evaporates when it comes to global - warming believers.

Stephen Sackur: «Do you think the American people agree with President Trump when he tweets, as he has n the last few years in fact as this is a consistent thought of his, that global warming is «a hoax» «I am not a believer,» he has said.

It is indeed inconsequential, whts was, and still is, consequential is the believers answer 1)(at the beginning) there is is no pause, you D9R 2)(later) there is pause, but, don't worry, this is not significant, models do happen to show «pause» up to 15 years long 3)(later, when 15 yearthreshold passed)... see, warming resumed, so let's ignore what we previously said