This recent post via Real Climate Science on NASA tampering of Sea - level rise highlights the blatant malfeasance that these government funded institutions will undertake in order to push the man - made global
warming climate change agenda, and keep the «Greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud in history» rolling and the billions upon billions of taxpayer funds flowing...
Not exact matches
Global
warming is once again on the
agenda as world leaders gather for the Paris
climate change summit.
Although Margaret Thatcher was the first world leader to warn about the threat of global
warming, and although David Cameron famously highlighted the issue too, other prominent Conservatives including Nigel Lawson and Peter Lilley have been outspoken in their opposition to the mainstream
agenda on
climate change.
I've been discussing
climate change with lots of people at campaign stalls recently, and it has opened my eyes as to how far this «balanced»
climate sceptic reporting is shaping the thinking of even those people who are concerned and want to see some action («I am aware that flying might make
climate change worse, but I'll still do it because the
warming may just be part of a natural cycle — I would stop if I was more certain»; «I am worried, but I have also heard that it is just water vapour which makes us
warmer, so we just don't kow if this CO2 thing is true, everybody seems to have a different
agenda» etc.).
It is interesting to note that the Lefties who push the Global
Warming agenda have quickly
changed the terminology to
Climate Change as a direct result of the work of some more critical members of the scientific community that started with more probing and critical research.
In recent years, global
warming,
climate change, and carbon dioxide were the main justifications for the
agenda.
3)
Agenda 3.1) Trenberth's unstated agenda and assertion is that: Anthropogenic global warming will cause catastrophic climate change with great suffering and massive economic
Agenda 3.1) Trenberth's unstated
agenda and assertion is that: Anthropogenic global warming will cause catastrophic climate change with great suffering and massive economic
agenda and assertion is that: Anthropogenic global
warming will cause catastrophic
climate change with great suffering and massive economic loss.
Every strategy was designed for the purpose of keeping truth seekers from finding out how flawed the data is on
climate change and global
warming — and from discovering just how far these radical green activists will go to push their political
agenda.
The UN and the IPCC have pursued a political
agenda that has relied extensively on fear - mongering about catastrophic global
warming and
climate change.
However, it is precisely these essentials — especially access to abundant, reliable, affordable energy — that are most at risk under the
agendas being promoted by global
warming (
climate change) alarmists.
Anything that might appear to discredit and «damage» the notion that there is a consensus on global
warming, aka
climate change, among all scientists must of necessity be a scary notion to «the team,» since their whole
agenda is to promote the idea that there is no question about its total acceptance among scientists.
Unfortunately, the establishment apparatchiks are still wasting their time and untold billions on a political
agenda, based on a failed global
warming theory and
climate change denial of reality, while real problems go unresolved.
The UN's IPCC and its coterie of green - sharia «scientists» have long pursued a political
agenda that requires all
climate change and global
warming to be a result of human CO2 emissions, and in addition, any solar impact on temperatures is absolutely minimal - yet, the empirical evidence does not support said political
agenda, including the BEST maximum temperature dataset
On June 30 I made a presentation at the Sixth International Conference on
Climate Change sponsored by the Heartland Institute in Washington, DC, entitled «Obama's Multifaceted Global
Warming Doctrine
Agenda and What Might Be Done to Slow It Down.»
With Democrats controlling the environmental
agenda in Congress, a panel of international scientists saying there's a greater - than - 90 percent chance that humans contribute to global
warming, and former vice president Al Gore calling
climate change a moral issue, many besieged global
warming skeptics are starting to tone down their rhetoric.
Sir Walter Scott (1771 - 1832) Support for the global
warming /
climate change agenda is becoming increasingly desperate, hysterical, and illogical.
ALEC has also helped advance this
agenda, as noted by PRWatch, opposing regional agreements to address
climate change and even hosting a workshop for ALEC politicians last year about «Warming Up to Climate Change,» about how increased carbon dioxide is supposedly good for you and leads to longer lif
climate change and even hosting a workshop for ALEC politicians last year about «Warming Up to Climate Change,» about how increased carbon dioxide is supposedly good for you and leads to longer life
change and even hosting a workshop for ALEC politicians last year about «
Warming Up to
Climate Change,» about how increased carbon dioxide is supposedly good for you and leads to longer lif
Climate Change,» about how increased carbon dioxide is supposedly good for you and leads to longer life
Change,» about how increased carbon dioxide is supposedly good for you and leads to longer lifespans.
Support for the global
warming /
climate change agenda is becoming increasingly desperate, hysterical, and illogical.
A new organization, appropriately named the Green New Deal Group, has picked up on this idea and is laying out an ambitious 100 month
agenda that it says is necessary to prevent dangerous global
warming, reports the BBC.Tackling the triple crisis of energy prices, the credit crunch and
climate change Comprising a number of experts from the fields of finance, energy and the environment, this group has issued a list of proposals that it claims will tackle the threats of high oil prices,
climate change and the credit crisis.
Heartland contends that skeptics lack a «platform from which they can be heard,» as «Their voices have been drowned out by publicity built upon the United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, an entity with an
agenda to build support for the theory of man - made catastrophic global
warming.»