If we are not hurry up to fight with global warming, soon we will suffer from global
warming consequence like who are in it now.
Not exact matches
I'd be happy to hearing a lot more songs about the great benefits of renewable energy sources
like the great waves of the big oceans, the wind (whether it is cold or
warm is of no
consequence), and of course the great shiner: the sun.
If the planet's climate were changing solely because that's what planets do, evolve through different climatic periods of
warming and cooling over millions of years, adverse
consequences like the loss of coral reefs and the potential for disappearing Polar Bears would still be undeniably sad, but at least a little easier to swallow.
Global
warming has of late felt
like a new issue, but it's useful once in a while to review the generations - long line of analysis that points to substantial climatic and environmental
consequences from rising emissions of greenhouse gases.
like the town that fails to put up a stop light until enough cadavers are carried away from an intersection, i am very pessimistic the United States will act on
consequences of
warming or mitigate them until the evidence or damage is overwhelming.
It should be televised just
like Hussein's hanging and we can all show the same mercy on Bush that he did on the 152 deathrow inmates he executed without one inkling of remorse, not to mention the 4000 American's he sent to death under false pretenses, not to mention the people mentioned in this article likely to bear the worst
consequence of global
warming.
It claims to be the first of its kind, but there have been one or two others
like it, such as the now universally - discredited Stern Report, which used the same unscientific rhetoric of «market failure» together with overstatements of the imagined
consequences of anthropogenic «global
warming» as a substitute for rigorous economic analysis.
Consider the possibility that not just millions, but billions face disastrous
consequences from the
likes of (including but not limited to): Sandy (and other hybrid and out - of - season storms enhanced by the earth's circulatory eccentricities and
warmer oceans); the drought in progress; wildfires; floods (just last week, Argentina had 16 inches of rain in 2 hours *); derechos; increased cold and snow in the north as the Arctic melts and cracks up, breaking up the Arctic circulation and sending cold out of what was previously largely a contained system, and losing its own consistent cold, seriously interfering with the Jet Stream, pollution of multiple kinds such as in China, the increase of algae and the
like in our oceans as they heat, and food and water shortages.
Previously you have said you'd
like to see a proper debate about the
consequences of global
warming (or words to that effect).
Like global
warming this will be a hickup without long - term
consequence.
While a
warm winter may seem
like a good thing, especially since it can provide relief to winter weather driving, massive amounts of shoveling and walking through tiring amounts of snow,
warm weather actually has negative
consequences.
«Storms
like Harvey are helped by one of the
consequences of climate change: As the air
warms, some of that heat is absorbed by the ocean, which in turn raises the temperature of the sea's upper layers.
A once - in - a-few-centuries
warm event became once per decade, and as this happens more frequently, so do the
consequences of this,
like droughts.
Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire
consequences of man - made global
warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.
More recently, the focus of the climate debate has centered on man - made or anthropogenic
warming, particularly as a
consequence of the burning of natural resources
like coal, oil, and natural gas and the associated carbon dioxide emissions.
What I would
like Yale and Columbia to review are the predictions that have been made over the past two decades concerning the
consequences of global
warming and look at how often these predictions have been wrong.
Now, keeping my musing about
consequences and policy implications separate from the science, I'd
like to ask anyone who wants to answer about the
consequences and policy implications of a rapid
warming shift.
Like start preparing for the global
warming and its
consequences...
Indeed, according to the EPA, so - called «enteric fermentation» in cows and other ruminant animals,
like sheep and goats, contributed 26 percent of the country's total emissions of methane, a hard - hitting greenhouse gas with much greater short term
warming consequences than carbon dioxide does (though the latter packs a far greater long - term punch).