Sentences with phrase «warming cycle theory»

Not exact matches

You don't have to doubt the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming theory to know that there are key variables that have important, measurable effects on world temperatures at these kind of timescales — ocean cycles come to mind immediately — which he has left out.

The observation of a historically high level of TSI from 1961 to 2001 tends to fit with the theories set out in my other articles about the real cause of recent warming and the real link between solar energy, ocean cycles and global temperatures.

AGW is a hypothesis that makes sense, namely: — GHGs absorb outgoing radiation, thereby contributing to warming (GH theory)-- CO2 is a GHG (as is water vapor plus some minor GHGs)-- CO2 concentrations have risen (mostly since measurements started in Mauna Loa in 1959)-- global temperature has risen since 1850 (in ~ 30 - year warming cycles with ~ 30 - year cycles of slight cooling in between)-- humans emit CO2 and other GHGs — ergo, human GHG emissions have very likely been a major contributor to higher GHG concentrations, very likely contributing to the observed warming

3) Muscheler seems to be asserting that temperature has been rising for the last 30 years when it has been roughly flat for the past 15 years (a fact that presents problems for Muscheler's preferred CO2 - warming theory, but is perfectly compatible with the solar - warming theory, after cycle 23 slowed down and dropped off a cliff).

By that standard, last week in Rochester we should have stopped preparing for winter given that we had several days of warm temperatures that surely made the temperature trends over some reasonable time period of a week or more positive rather than negative, as would be expected if this seasonal cycle theory was real.

That's as far as I'm going with this, the next 1 or 2 years will be make or break for all theories — AGW, solar / ocean cycles, luke - warm, everyone, so there's no point going round and round on an argument that the actual observed climate will resolve one way or the other very soon.

Now, the current failed theory of Global Warming put forth by the armchair alarmists is that the glacial cycles are ruled by 100 - ppm swings in CO2 and 300 - ppb swings in CH4.

At the point we that have better data on full cycles of warming and cooling, more proper theory and models will evolve.

Gcm or at least the literature have a difficult task reconciling the metrics with two underlying theories of opposing signs with say synoptic storms and baroclinicity due to the reduction in meridional gradient in a warming world, and the increase of water vapor, hence life birth cycles.

CO2 as a feedback («lagging factor») in the glacial cycles is not a contradiction of modern greenhouse theories or anthropogenic global warming theories at all.

So, having defeated Al Gore in what the Democrats still insist was a stolen election, we have come full circle to George W. introducing legislation to lock into place the bogus theory of global warming, insuring that, as the Earth gives every sign of entering a cooling cycle, we shall continue to destroy the economy by reducing «greenhouse gas» emissions.