The only way, the last decade could not have been the «warmist ever», is if a cooling trend had set in over the whole decade, that was equal or greater than the previous
warming decades trends.
Not exact matches
While this is bad news for the planet, it's good news for climate change scientists who have — for the last two
decades — puzzled over
warming trends in ocean surface temperatures for nearly 20 years.
There is also evidence that the
warming trend has stopped, for example, a slight cooling
trend in the last
decade, and that the sun's cycles have more to do with climate
warming and cooling than anything we are capable of doing But none of that matters.
And now, a study published online March 13 in Nature Communications reports a strong correlation between the severe winter weather experienced in the northeastern United States over the last
decade and the
warming trend in the Arctic.
«This
trend to have even more dramatic numbers of overnight lower temperatures being exceedingly
warm is consistent with what we have seen in recent
decades,» he said.
When they corrected the error, Wentz and Schabel derived a
warming trend of about 0.07 °C per
decade, more in line with surface thermometers and climate models.
«It's fair to say that over the next couple of
decades, we would expect to see the
trend reverse, and internal variability accelerating the
warming.»
Causes of
warming trends at higher latitudes have gained more widespread attention from researchers in the past few
decades, but the idea that the Arctic would
warm faster than the rest of the planet has been around for more than 100 years.
The cooling
trend was reversed during the 20th century, with four of the five
warmest decades of our 2000 - year - long reconstruction occurring between 1950 and 2000.
«We conclude there has been no reduction in the global
warming trend of 0.15 (to) 0.20 ºC (per)
decade that began in the late 1970s.»
Models suggest that it is perfectly possible for a
decade or two of cooling to occur even when there is a long - term
warming trend.
However, Goddard said the results don't fully show the slowdown has disappeared when comparing the past 15 years to the
decades preceding that period and that understanding the natural fluctuations in climate on a year - to - year (or even
decade - to -
decade) basis provides important context to the
warming trends driven by carbon dioxide.
If greenhouse gas emissions continue on their current
trend, the rate of
warming will reach 0.7 °F per
decade and stay that high until at least 2100.
This continues the
trend of
warming winters over the past few
decades as the climate
warms from increasing greenhouse gases, with the eastern two - thirds of the country
warming the most during the winter.
Although a significant natural influence on weather patterns, the temperature effects of the cycle smooth out over years and
decades, and aren't linked to the overall
warming trend.
He predicts an acceleration of
warming trends to take place in coming
decades but what that means for cloud formation, hydrological cycles and other events that affect albedo is unknown.
Much of this change has occurred over the last several
decades indicating that the
warming trend accelerated over the 1925 — 2016 period.
But
trends over the past 40 years have been decidedly up, with
warming approaching 0.4 °F per
decade.
Interestingly, this
trend was weaker than the global SST
warming trend (+0.16 °C per
decade, p < 0.01; Fig. 1l).
Even if we focus exclusively on global surface temperatures, Cowtan & Way (2013) shows that when we account for temperatures across the entire globe (including the Arctic, which is the part of the planet
warming fastest), the global surface
warming trend for 1997 — 2015 is approximately 0.14 °C per
decade.
The aforementioned Foster and Rahmstorf (2011) found a 0.16 °C per
decade warming trend since 1979 after filtering out the short - term noise.
The Western Antarctic Peninsula has been rapidly cooling since 1999 -LRB--0.47 °C per
decade), reversing the previous
warming trend and leading to «a shift to surface mass gains of the peripheral glacier» (Oliva et al., 2017).
For example, the borehole data show
warming since about 1500 AD which clearly was not anthropogenic, and in the latest
decade, since the very
warm 1998, the temperature
trend is downward even in the Hadley Center compilations; the most ardent supporters of anthropogenic global
warming.
Seasonal decreases in land precipitation since the 1950s are the main cause for some of the drying
trends, although large surface
warming during the last two to three
decades has also likely contributed to the drying.
Data analysis, physical observations and basic arithmetic all show ENSO can not explain the long term
warming trend over the past few
decades.
However, it is unable to explain the long term
warming trend over the past few
decades.
This year fits into the long - term
trend of global
warming with more hot years set to come over the next
decade or two.
This animation shows how the same temperature data (green) that is used to determine the long - term global surface air
warming trend of 0.16 °C per
decade (red) can be used inappropriately to «cherrypick» short time periods that show a cooling
trend simply because the endpoints are carefully chosen and the
trend is dominated by short - term noise in the data (blue steps).
Isn't it strange how six periods of cooling can add up to a clear
warming trend over the last 4
decades?
Still, given that the last
decade has not seen a significant amount of
warming (although any
trend is swamped by noise), 20 years of little
warming would give skeptics a little wiggle room.
I often see the
warming trend of the last few
decades explained away as «It's the PDO» or something similar.
Climate experts know that the long - term
warming trend has not abated in the past
decade.
It is now clear that, for thirty years, we have been in a strong global
warming trend at a rate of about 0.2 Celsius per
decade for the past 30 years, [meaning] there has been 1 degree Fahrenheit (0.56 degrees Celsius) global
warming in the past 30 years.
Still, given that the last
decade has not seen a significant amount of
warming (although any
trend is swamped by noise), 20 years of little
warming would give skeptics a little wiggle room.
Finally, to show that cosmic rays were actually responsible for some part of the recent
warming you would need to show that there was actually a decreasing
trend in cosmic rays over recent
decades — which is tricky, because there hasn't been (see the figure)(Missing step # 5).
Future topics that will be discussed include: climate sensitivity, sea level rise, urban heat island - effects, the value of comprehensive climate models, ocean heat storage, and the
warming trend over the past few
decades.
«Finally, subtropical drying
trends predicted from the
warming alone fall well short of those observed in recent
decades.
You can also see in this graph that the
warming trend in the global data for the low troposphere, if we consider the whole set of data, i.e. from the average between 1980 - 1982 till now, with now meaning the average of the last three years, the
warming trend is, AT MOST, 0.115 ºC /
decade (0.3 ºC in 26 years), but the graph is going down recently, so it should be even less.
... and there is a second impossibility compounding the first one: during the last few
decades of accelerating global
warming, the Sun has been very precisely monitored from space, and its brightness hasn't shown any discernable
trend.
«The overall
warming trend declines from the «observed» rate of 0.116 °C /
decade to a «corrected» rate of 0.092 °C /
decade.»
Given how much yelling takes place on the Internet, talk radio, and elsewhere over short - term cool and hot spells in relation to global
warming, I wanted to find out whether anyone had generated a decent
decades - long graph of global temperature
trends accounting for, and erasing, the short - term up - and - down flickers from the cyclical shift in the tropical Pacific Ocean known as the El Niño — Southern Oscillation, or ENSO, cycle.
The report touches on the «temperature hiatus» of the last 15 years, but notes (as in the graphic above) that the basic
trend in
warming is unrelenting when looked at
decade by
decade.
cherry pick the internal / natural variability with a negative
trend and then argue that 2010 is significantly
warmer than the rest of the
decade??
If only half the
warming over 1976 - 2000 (linear
trend 0.18 °C /
decade) was indeed anthropogenic, and the IPCC AR5 best estimate of the change in anthropogenic forcing over that period (linear
trend 0.33Wm - 2 /
decade) is accurate, then the transient climate response (TCR) would be little over 1 °C.
It seems a bit odd that no
warming trend at all this
decade is confirming to high confidence a
warming trend.
Also, James Hansen successfully predicted in 1981 the
trend of the past several
decades of global
warming, including a good approximation of the noise around the
trend.
He predicts an acceleration of
warming trends to take place in coming
decades but what that means for cloud formation, hydrological cycles and other events that affect albedo is unknown.
Yes, the oceans are
warming but these
trends are 10 % to 20 % of the predicted surface
warming trend of about 0.2 C per
decade.
What does happen in a giben month, year and sometimes
decades is faster or slower
warming for the given time period, but this does not reverse the
warming trend or do anything to refute the dangers to health that GHG's present with.
-- Given these constraints on climate forcing
trends, we predict additional
warming in the next 50 years of 3/4 + / - 1/4 °C, a
warming rate of 0.15 + / - 0.05 °C per
decade.