Sentences with phrase «warming denialists who»

You know, the global warming denialists who for years have managed to say, «Well, the case is not proven.

Not exact matches

The happy band of denialists (presumably the gang of nine who advise Judge Alsup with their nonsense) have been «quietly but very busily investigating how much global warming we may cause, known as the «equilibrium - sensitivity» question.»

It was even demonstrated in a paper by prominent global - warming denialists (who correctly estimated the lag, but the rest of their thesis was rebutted here).

And of course none of the denialists who claimed that warming peaked in 1998 or that warming has leveled out make a peep about being wrong... again.

The happy band of denialists (presumably the gang of nine who advise Judge Alsup with their nonsense) have been «quietly but very busily investigating how much global warming we may cause, known as the «equilibrium - sensitivity» question.»

We have those who say that this just gives more ammo to the denialists, who will (correctly) point out that our own science is telling us that we can't prevent the warming (of course, more warming is even worse, but that would be the NEXT conversation after this one); we have philosophers telling us that the planet has a fever and we are the infection which caused it; we have many, many more who continue to insist that maybe NOW we will finally undertake drastic emissions reductions.

The denialist cut - paste attempts to — via logical fallacy, hand - waving and dissembling — make it appear that... that... well, who knows but it isn't germane nor does it refute eroding coastlines due to less ice, nor does the denialist cut - paste refute the facts of melting permafrost, CH4 release, warmer Arctic temps, birds moving north into the Arctic, increased freshwater flow into the northern seas, and numerous other indicators.

The troll's first citation is to good old Wikkithing which presently contains an unchallenged quote from Scarfetta & Wilson (2014) who are well known as being denialist sources that would warm the cockles of any cold - blooded troll.

From my perspective, we have a remarkably large and loud number of people, many of them are our leaders, who are denialists and naysayers with regard to the science of global warming.

Goddard is the pseudonym of climate denialist Tony Heller, who has been active in the anti-global warming action campaign since 2008.

Yet, as Festinger would have predicted, instead of falling silent, perhaps even admitting error, the denialists have become more vehement in their attacks on climate scientists, environmentalists and anyone who accepts the evidence for global warming.

The updated analysis undercuts denialists of climate change who have long - argued that global warming has «stopped» and the world was growing cooler.

Like the tobacco lobbyists who spent years denying the links between smoking and cancer, global warming denialists don't have to win the debate — they simply have to confuse the public indefinitely to successfully undermine any political action which might hit the interests of their backers in the fossil fuel industries

But you don't need to be a global warming denialist, or even a sceptic to be part of the 56 % of us who are unconvinced of science's current ability to successfully model the climate.

Most of the glibertarians, cultural conservatives, and gadget - heads who constitute the useful idiots around the core oil - and - coal - company global - warming denialist constituency would be horrified to imagine themselves playing the role of 9/11 Truthers, or RFK Jr. pumping the thimerosal / autism link, or Thabo Mbeki claiming that AIDS isn't caused by HIV.

The use of the word «denialist» has the connotations of those who do not believe in the Holocaust and is intended to denigrate those who disagree with the belief that man is responsible for the earth warming.

I note that the word «denialist» is used to describe people who have an alternative view to that of man made climate change and the «Comment Policy» forbids the use of other words which offend those who believe in man made global warming.

The show trial was a chance for the Kochtopus, fossil fuel interests, and global warming skeptics (including Senator James Inhofe (R - OK) who announced he is releasing a denialist book) to cry foul that industry is being victimized and that global warming is not a threat, and does not pose any risks to the health and well - being of Americans, and the planet.

The Denialist Party is spouting Kremlin / Gazprom canards about the supposedly greedy, dishonest climate scientists who allegedly mislead people about global warming.

I told a denialist to name one climate scientist (publishing in top peer - review journals within the past 5 years) who disagreed that anthropogenic global warming was happening.

Lynn Vincentnathan 17 August 2010 at 3:06 PM «I told a denialist to name one climate scientist (publishing in top peer - review journals within the past 5 years) who disagreed that anthropogenic global warming was happening.»

Statement from a «denialist» (who shall remain unnamed): «Earth has warmed from about 287 K to about 287.6 K during the Twentieth Century.