Sentences with phrase «warming deniers as»

Readers will know that as a lukewarmer, I have as little patience with outright CO2 warming deniers as I do with those declaring a catastrophe (for my views read this and this).

FYI, this paper is already being widely cited on blogs by global warming deniers as proof that all of the climate models are wrong, wrong, wrong and that the whole concept of anthropogenic GHG - caused warming has been refuted.

Under this sort of rule, environmentalist groups would have to accept global warming deniers as members / officers, and African - American groups would have to accept neo-nazis, etc..

With record temperatures the past seven months; with 2016 almost certainly going to be the hottest year globally on record (beating out 2015 and 2014); with the Great Barrier Reef sustaining massive (perhaps irreversible) damage due to global warming induced coral bleaching; and with Donald Trump bloviating about droughts and picking a global warming denier as his energy advisor, the sooner the deniers like Smith are out of power, the better our planet — the better all of us, every human on Earth — will be.

Not exact matches

The irony continues with the feting of Okotoks as the greenest community in Canada by such pundits as Prime Minister Stephen Harper and CBC's Peter Mansbridge at the same time the «rurban» community sits in the chosen provincial riding of Wildrose leader Danielle Smith — a right wing student of the climate - change - denying Fraser Institute and cheerful avower that global warming science is «not settled.»

«It's akin to those who don't believe in man - made global warming being labeled as «deniers»» What WOULD you call them, then?

But Tevez denied the allegation and blamed a misunderstanding, insisting he had merely refused to warm up — something he felt unnecessary as he had already done so.

LONDON: Lorenzo Insigne's penalty three minutes from time denied England another impressive World Cup warm - up friendly result as the video assistant referee (VAR) helped Italy salvage a 1 - 1 draw at Wembley on Tuesday.

Reaction: De Bruyne is my Man City blueprint — Guardiola (Premier League) Report: De Bruyne makes it sweet 16 for awesome Man City (Premier League) Report: Otamendi wins derby to fire Man City 11 points clear (Premier League) Reaction: Klopp calls for Liverpool focus after Euro spree (Champions League) Report: «Fab Four» fire seven - goal Liverpool into last 16 (Champions League) Reaction: Mourinho pledges only «the truth» on injuries (Champions League) Report: Lukaku and Rashford send Man United into last 16 (Champions League) Reaction: Mourinho wants new shooting boots for Lukaku (Premier League) Report: Old boy Young downs Watford to lift Man United (Premier League) Reaction: Klopp looks on bright side after Chelsea draw (Premier League) Report: Willian denies Liverpool morale - boosting win (Premier League) Reaction: Guardiola targets Champions League milestone (Champions League) Report: Sterling strikes late to earn Man City top spot (Champions League) Report: Young England stifle Neymar's Brazil (friendly) Reaction: Loftus - Cheek showed he can cut it — Southgate (friendly) Report: New boys impress as England hold Germany (friendly) Reaction: Mourinho defends lack of Lukaku charity (Champions League) Report: Hapless Svilar helps Man Utd to brink of last 16 (Champions League) Reaction: «Stand up and be counted», Klopp tells Liverpool (Premier League) Report: Spurs» Kane rips sorry Liverpool to shreds (Premier League) Reaction: Guardiola proud to beat «best opponents» Napoli (Champions League) Report: Jesus earns Man City narrow win over Napoli (Champions League) Reaction: Mourinho and Klopp at odds over Anfield stalemate (Premier League) Report: Man Utd held at Liverpool as Mourinho parks the bus (Premier League) Report: McClean breaks Welsh hearts as Ireland reach play - offs (2018 World Cup) Reaction: Southgate admits England have long way to go (2018 World Cup) Report: Kane sends lacklustre England to World Cup (2018 World Cup) Reaction: Man City's show of force thrills Guardiola (Champions League) Report: Chelsea old boy De Bruyne gives Man City crucial win (Champions League) Reaction: «Amazing» Lukaku won't lose focus — Mourinho (Champions League) Report: Lukaku and Martial lead Man United in CSKA rout (Champions League) Reaction: Klopp says Liverpool on track despite stalemate (Champions League) Report: Coutinho scores as Liverpool held in Moscow (Champions League) Reaction: Man United part of «second level», says Mourinho (Champions League) Report: Fix - it Fellaini gets Man United off the mark (Champions League) Reaction: De Bruyne masterclass leaves Guardiola purring (Premier League) Report: Mané sent off as five - star Man City crush Liverpool (Premier League) Reaction: Alli gesture takes shine off England win (2018 World Cup) Report: Rashford redemption sends England closer to Russia (2018 World Cup) Reaction: Klopp hopes Euro progress yields transfer lift (Champions League) Report: Can brace gets Liverpool back into big time (Champions League) Report: Sterling rescue act spares 10 - man Man City (Premier League) Reaction: Conte happy for Chelsea to play the hunters (Premier League) Report: Alonso ruins Spurs» Wembley house - warming (Premier League) Report: Lukaku double fires Man United to winning start (Premier League) Reaction: Wenger lauds Giroud after Arsenal edge Leicester (Premier League) Report: Giroud earns Arsenal madcap opening win (Premier League) Reaction: Wenger fearful of another slow Arsenal start (Community Shield) Report: Courtois and Morata gift Arsenal victory at Wembley (Community Shield)

As for pundits the Merson types are like climate scientists who deny global warming is anthropgenic, not because they really believe it but because it gets them exposure in the media which they wouldn't get if they simply went along with the crowd.

And before you label me as a «denier», my reference above is to AGW (what you term man - made global warming).

That said, in general - in the United States, at least - the issue isn't so much about denying global warming as much as it is about protecting and favoring the major fossil fuel industries:

Scientists and others who hope to inform the public or spur action have long struggled with how to convey the high stakes of global warming without making people feel helpless or fueling deniers by coming across as alarmist.

Christopher Miles What bothers me is that there is still so much waste in the system as the deniers continue to say how Global Warming cult will kill economy.

Environmental groups have been frustrated by the Bush administrations rejection of the Kyoto treaty and what Sohn describes as its tendency to deny, deflect blame and delay when it comes to issues involving global warming.

In so far as some sceptics and deniers are proclaiming that carbon dioxide - induced anthropogenic global warming may be «the scientific fraud of the century» then surely the issues surrounding it must be the scientific debate of the century.

Climate - change - denying politicians like to point to the cold snaps as some sort of proof global warming is not happening.

Although some correspondents seemed eager to jump to the exact global warming — denying conclusions Keppler and Röckmann had cautioned against, others expressed a more thoughtful attitude as to how this discovery might affect our understanding of global climate change.

As I understand it, the GCR - idea does not deny human influences on global warming and does not really provide a good estimate of what the magnitude of GCR influences might be.

He is clearly not denying that warming is taking place insofar as he specifically endorses temperature records showing that warming is taking place, and he is also concerned about human contributions to these changes.

But as far as I can tell, most sceptics don't flat out deny greenhouse gas warming, but they incorporate their «extra» forcing by assuming a lower climate sensitivity.

I had thought there was a legitimate scientific debate about the role of global warming and hurricanes, but it appears that the deniers, although they are legitimate scientists, seem to have fallen in with the think tank ideologues and PR lobbyists who masquerade as scientists.

Global Climate Coalition dissolves as many corporations grapple with threat of warming, but oil lobby convinces US administration to deny problem.

Wolford 200 denier tights to keep me warm, as well as the layering with a Maison Martin Margiela x H&M turtle neck, and Pauw leather biker jacket (similar low budget, or high end).

As a huge Batman nerd, I'm a bit biased to this film, but how can you deny that powerful stories about a marathon runner, a boy with cancer, a cop, and wealthy guy who dresses up and visits sick kids at hospitals isn't heart - warming and inspiring.

And, adding insult to injury, as the years go on and global warming becomes harder to deny, BIG CO2 will have the regulatory / legal costs as well.

As the world gets warmer (which no one is denying) you are going to see more instances of high temperatures, including more record - setting highs and less record - setting lows.

2000 The Global Climate Coalition dissolves as many corporations grapple with the threat of warming, but the oil lobby convinces the U.S. administration to deny a problem exists.

Numerous denier arguments involving slight fluctuations in the global distribution of warmer vs cooler sea surface areas as supposed explanations of climate change neglect all the energy that goes into ocean heat content, melting large ice deposits and so forth.

The claims of global warming deniers that public opinion is on their side are as bogus as their pseudo-science, pseudo-economics and pseudo-ideology.

I've been fascinated by how, as the global warming debate went on, the deniers all suddenly began to attack windmills.

I find the distinction just as useless as «warmer» or «denier.»

While RealClimate has called into question the soundness of the paper's quite narrow conclusions of discrepancy between model predictions and measurements of the relative rate of warming of different levels of the atmosphere over the tropics, this paper is being touted by the deniers as showing that the models are wrong to predict any warming at all, and that predictions of future warming and climate change can be entirely discounted.

As usual with any Post article that discusses global warming and climate change, the comments are already dominated by sneering, arrogant deniers who ignore the actual content of the article and launch into their scripted, robotic, idiotic diatribes.

This is contributing to all of us going down the tubes together as a result of global warming skeptics and deniers who are playing around with the well known casino rule of «gambler's ruin» by always betting against the house.

And, Radge, I don't deny the realities of global warming, I don't assume that scientists (as a body) don't practice what they preach, nor do I intend to imply that they are hypocrites.

Of course, deniers will immediately recognize that Gavin's choice of smooth versus chunky peanut butter, and red versus black ants, and odd versus even numbered dominoes, all biased the model towards a preplanned warming trend, as later confirmed by his personal text messages, to be released on WikiLeaks in coming months.

Global warming deniers however, as you have said, are obsessed by water vapour and good information is needed to show them how they are fooling themselves.

I don't know squat about other planets (& not much about Earth), but it seems contrarians are using «warming of other planets» as a reason to deny AGW here on Earth.

I don't deny that currently we might be in a warming trend, but I also understand that the geologic period we are in is referred to as an interglacial period.

The global warming denier blogs, where this issue first came up, seem to think that I was being critical of the I.P.C.C. report in the same way as seen from their perspective, and, as a result, I have received e-mails from the denier crowd hailing my remarks and commending me for «speaking up» on this important topic.

Those who deny global warming are for me in the same class as Holocaust deniers and have more of an ulterior motive than critically thinking about the reality humanity is facing.

You might argue that e.g. global - warming deniers are not ignorant, as they are typically well aware of the body of scientific knowledge that they choose to actively disbelieve, so they are not a proper subject of agnotology as I understand it.

Stratospheric cooling accompanied by surface warming is actually PREDICTED by GHG model yet GW deniers present the stratospheric cooling part as «proof» that global warming was NOT happening!!

As I understand it, the GCR - idea does not deny human influences on global warming and does not really provide a good estimate of what the magnitude of GCR influences might be.

As a «rate this comment» feature, you should have a thermometer graphic, that ranges on the scale of frigid (denier) to cold (skeptic) to warm (believer) to hot (alarmist).

Any speculation (or better, refutation, $ 1000 paid, as posted this site earlier) re why not just warming «deniers» but supposed doomsayers don't stress this?

My talk, on Wednesday, was about the subject of my new book, Fool Me Twice: fighting the assault on science in America, and ways NASA scientists, particularly NASA climate scientists, can communicate complex science in the face of antiscience attacks, such as those by global warming deniers.

(infamous DENIER David Evans) * The line of Empirical Evidence (peer reviewed, published, replicated) that humans are causing global warming is as follows:.

But what is surprising is that notorious global warming denier S. Fred Singer was described at a skeptic conference today as a Nobel prize winner, a flat out lie.