Not exact matches
As usual with any Post article that discusses global
warming and climate change, the comments are already dominated by sneering, arrogant
deniers who
ignore the actual content of the article and launch into their scripted, robotic, idiotic diatribes.
I'd object that public ignorance that there is a scientific consensus on many aspects of global
warming is a proper subject of agnotology, and that no theory of this ignorance can
ignore the active efforts of those sort - of - knowledgeable
deniers.
The sort of logic that can
deny the obvious
warming of the planet is the kind of logic that
ignores the forest for the rotting treetrunk in the corner.
It's conceivable that reporters and administrators at NPR may uniformly be able to summarize the collective global
warming issue as «we can
ignore climate
deniers because the science of man - caused global
warming is settled and because Michael Oreskes» sister proved
denier scientists are paid industry money to lie about it being not settled.»
One of the myriad incorrect assertions by climate - change
deniers is that scientists who have proven manmade causes for the current global
warming ignore periods of
warming in the Earth's past that were not caused by industrial pollution.
What
deniers will
ignore is that the probability of the
warmest year being 2015, 2014, or 2010 will be extremely high, nearly certain.
It's hard to
deny that there may be some risk, just as its impossible to
deny one might get hit by a car tomorrow morning, but this is speculative in the extreme, and
ignores a vast number of counteracting «negative» feedbacks from the biosphere, as well as the lack of average global
warming of the last 18 years.
The reason why the phrases «Anti-science», «Evidence -
deniers», and» Global Warming Deniers» are used is that the «Anti-science Deniers» ignore demonstrable evidence, and fabricate stories and «facts» that are not
deniers», and» Global
Warming Deniers» are used is that the «Anti-science Deniers» ignore demonstrable evidence, and fabricate stories and «facts» that are not
Deniers» are used is that the «Anti-science
Deniers» ignore demonstrable evidence, and fabricate stories and «facts» that are not
Deniers»
ignore demonstrable evidence, and fabricate stories and «facts» that are not true..
The latter provides the Guardian with a handy alibi (see, global
warming deniers are free to express themselves) which allows Monbiot to
ignore substantive criticism and concentrate on Savonarola - like moralising.
This edition has been revised and reformulated with a new chapter template of short chapter introductions, study questions at... View Details Global
Warming - Alarmists, Skeptics and
Deniers: A Geoscientist Looks at the Science of Climate Change by G. Dedrick Robinson (Author), Gene D. Robinson III (Author) Global
Warming - Alarmists, Skeptics &
Deniers: A Geoscientist looks at the Science of Climate Change, brings a unique geological perspective to this politically charged issue, a perspective that has been
ignored far too long.
Both holocaust
deniers and global
warming skeptics
ignore overwhelming evidence.
-- Their strong claim of shaking the foundations of climate science is extremely unlikely; They don't provide compelling evidence for such an extraordinary claim; They vastly overestimate the likelihood of cooling effects (feedbacks), and underestimate,
deny or
ignore warming effects.