Sentences with phrase «warming effect described»

If this is the case, these clouds would reflect more light, which could counteract the slight warming effect described by Grise and his colleagues, said Dennis Hartmann, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Washington in Seattle who was not involved with the new study.

Not exact matches

The warm, Christian smiles were set aside at that point, and the time - delayed effect of our own indoctrination came into play: We dropped the guise of warm, friendly God - the - Son and reverted back to God - the - Father who looks at the entire world as described in Psalm 50:10 and says, «Everything I see is MINE.»

The surveys asked 84,086 respondents to gauge the level of threat they attributed to climate change (some of the surveys used different words to describe the phenomenon, such as global warming and the greenhouse effect).

I haven't look at the research on the effect of warm - ups in at least 20 years... but as I recall, a warm - up set was shown to be beneficial in the manner that you describe — priming the muscles and making them stronger for the first heavy set.

Constable would often record his thoughts on the back of the studies, for example on Branch Hill Pond, Hampstead he writes: «We have had noble clouds and effects of light and dark and colour — as is always the case with such seasons as the present», while on Cloud Study, Hampstead he describes a «morning under the sun, clouds silvery grey on warm sultry ground».

In Orange Family, an acrylic on panel, the artist produced a captivating chromatic exploration that truly must be viewed in person to fully comprehend its illusory effects, which we periodically describe as, «basking in the warm glow.»

In 2005, the New York Times described the effects of warming on the environment and on the four million people who live in the Arctic, and scientists» assessments of the inevitability of Arctic melting.

I like how she describes the struggles of Snowman as he tries to survive on an earth that has returned to a «wild» state yet is beset by the continuing effects of global warming and ozone layer depletion.

I'm not a cloud expert, and I may be describing this particular uncertainty inaccurately, but I use this as one example, and (unless this aspect of the science has changed in recent months) I believe that one aspect of uncertainty has to do with these clouds and their ultimate net effect as the atmosphere warms.

Whenever I talk about Global Warming, I generally try to stress that «Global Warming» and «Climate Change» describe different parts of an overall effect that we tend to lump together.

I say this and provide the image to add to the realisation that what Humanity is observing is NOT due to «greenhouse» (the effect is still not described in a valid manner and even the materials involved do not present «greenhouse behavior» let alone produce a «greenhouse effect») but is the end play to the same (now ~ 20000 to ~ 15000 year old) warming cycle.

Next, he describes how some of this energy is trapped in Earth's atmosphere by the greenhouse effect, which warms our planet.

The results described above which use a process - based approach incorporated the effect of a shift from snow to rain due to warming, but the studies did not delineate this specific effect from the general results.

Not only does it better describe the case of diminishing returns (the first few molecules of pigment do the most darkening while added pigment never quite stops making it darker) but also how just a few ounces of black pigment change the temperature of a thousand pound car body sitting in the sun from luke warm to burning hot (illustrating how a tiny percentage of adulterant can have a large effect).

Dr. Roy Spencer's article Global Warming and Nature's Thermostat here, describes the role of precipitation systems in controlling the greenhouse effect.

Pekka, to claim that the temperature effect of CO2 absorbing IR in the atmosphere is unmeasurable except in the atmosphere is a good way of glossing over the fact that the claimed warming phenomenon (backradiation or insulation or IR absorption) is: a. imprecisely described, and non-existent according to G&T b. untested in the laboratory — probably because it hasn't been precisely described c. very small according to the precisely measured radiative transfer data precisely modeled in Spectralcalc d. confounded by other variables in the real atmosphere

The comprehensive paper, entitled «Explaining ocean warming: causes, scale, effects and consequences,» described the swift warming of the seas as «the greatest hidden challenge of our generation.»

In m y opinion, we need a new moniker to describe the total effect of global warming (Climate Change is just way too passive for my taste.).

The «warming» describes the effect of trapped gasses and the general trend of global temperatures.

When someone comes up with an experimental method that predictably and reproducibly can mathematically describe the cause / effect mechanism between greenhouse gases and CO2 then I'll believe global warming is real.

Until now you couldn't describe how that greenhouse effect works or more specifically how backradiation is supposed to warm (or increase heat content of) the surface.

Rather than ancient snow pack, only an empty rock - strewn riverbed remains: the glacier has lost 320 vertical feet of ice mass in the intervening years in what researchers describe as a striking effect of global warming.

The phenological advancements described in this case are probably attributable to both climate warming and the UHI effect.

Given that the cosmic ray effect described by Svensmark would be more than sufficient to account for the net estimated temperature change since the Industrial Revolution, the key question becomes: Has human activity actually warmed, cooled or had no net impact on the planet?

What sets it apart is that it expands the discussion of the impacts of global warming beyond the next century and convincingly describes the effects that are projected for the next few thousand years.

He said that ``... the global warming is now large enough that we can describe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed warming.»