BUFFALO, N.Y. — The climate accord reached in Paris this month aims to cut planet -
warming emissions worldwide with the goal of averting the most disastrous effects of climate change.
Not exact matches
Coal - burning power plants in the United States emit about 2.1 billion tons of carbon dioxide each year — nearly 17 percent of
worldwide coal
emissions — and finding technologies that reduce those
emissions in the United States and China, which burns even more coal than we do, is crucial to combating global
warming.
They said that two extreme climate periods — the Medieval
Warming Period between 800 and 1300 and the Little Ice Age of 1300 to 1900 — occurred
worldwide, at a time before industrial
emissions of greenhouse gases became abundant.
DENVER — Even as governments
worldwide have largely failed to limit
emissions of global
warming gases, the decline of fossil fuel production may reduce those
emissions significantly, experts said yesterday during a panel discussion at the Geological Society of America meeting.
Over what time period might this savannization process release carbon «equivalent to several years of
worldwide carbon
emissions», and how does that affect the assessment offered by Gore, Hansen and others that we have perhaps ten years in which to substantially reduce CO2
emissions to avoid irreversible catastrophic
warming?
Scientists say electricity generation is responsible for one - quarter of the world's total CO2
emissions — the main cause of global
warming — and U.S. power plants account for fully 25 percent of the
emissions generated by the power sector
worldwide.
In a forthcoming paper for the Harvard Law and Policy review, «Fast Clean Cheap,» we argue that a regulation - centered approach would only achieve 10 — 30 percent
emissions reductions in the U.S. by 2050, whereas we need 80 percent
emissions reductions in the U.S. and 50 percent
emissions reductions
worldwide by then if we are to avoid catastrophic global
warming.
Even after decades of increasingly dire warnings, the US has still not passed comprehensive federal legislation to combat global
warming; Canada has abandoned past pledges in order to exploit its
emissions - heavy tar sands; China continues to depend on coal for its energy production; Indonesia's effort to stem widespread deforestation is facing stiff resistance from industry; Europe is mulling pulling back on its more ambitious cuts if other nations do not join it; northern nations are scrambling to exploit the melting Arctic for untapped oil and gas reserves; and fossil fuels continue to be subsidized
worldwide to the tune of $ 400 billion.
Governments
worldwide have in principle accepted that greenhouse gas
emissions should be reduced and average global
warming limited to a rise of 2 °C.
You'll note an acceleration of those temperatures in the late 1970s as greenhouse gas
emissions from energy production increased
worldwide and clean air laws reduced
emissions of pollutants that had a cooling effect on the climate, and thus were masking some of the global
warming signal.
Nations
worldwide have just agreed to limit carbon dioxide
emissions in hopes of preventing global
warming from surpassing 2 - degrees Celsius by 2100.
Quote from the UK's CCS roadmap: «according to the International Energy Agency, CCS will play a vital role in
worldwide efforts to limit global
warming, delivering a fifth of the
emissions reductions needed by 2050.
Based on international standards (ISO 14025), EPDs have
worldwide applicability and include information about product environmental impacts such as resources, energy use and efficiency, global
warming potential,
emissions to air, soil and water, and waste generation.
In his book, The Green Wave (Capital Research Center, 2006), author Bonner Cohen notes that the companies expected to profit handsomely from the Kyoto global
warming treaty by creating the
worldwide trading network in which industries would buy and sell carbon
emissions credits.»
Sensing an opportunity to capitalize on
worldwide efforts to fight global
warming while simultaneously protecting elements of its economy, Brazil has proposed the establishment of voluntary fund into which developed countries, companies, and other entities pay to finance a program to reduce
emissions from deforestation.
To keep
warming well below 2 degrees C, and ideally 1.5 degrees C — temperatures that could lead to catastrophic consequences —
worldwide emissions must start trending down by 2020.
Almost 100 organizations Thursday launched a
worldwide petition that calls for dramatically curbing greenhouse - gas
emissions and helping vulnerable communities prepare for rising sea levels, more - frequent storms, longer droughts and other effects of global
warming.
Nevertheless, it seems likely that a CO2 concentration in the range 500 to 900 ppm might produce a temperature rise of at least 2 °C from the late 19th century that could be problematic for humankind; (7) The potential negative impact on humanity has been exaggerated; (8) The only alternative to rising greenhouse gas concentrations is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2
emissions — whether this averts a «pending disaster» is not well understood; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 probably resulting in some
warming; (10) Such reductions in CO2
emissions are neither technically feasible nor economically affordable, and would necessitate inadequate energy supply to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing, leading to
worldwide depression.
Because of the slow nature of the carbon cycle and ocean thermal inertia, even if we were to immediately cease all anthropogenic carbon
emissions right this very second,
worldwide, we'd still see more
warming for decades.
Aviation fuel, for example, is currently tax - free
worldwide, despite airplane
emissions causing 3.5 percent of global
warming.
This pattern of
warming and cooling in the U.S. may be part of a
worldwide pattern: while most of the earth has
warmed, the regions that are downwind from major sources of air pollution (specifically sulfur dioxide
emissions) have generally cooled (Figure 1).
For polls see e.g., Brett W. Pelham, «Awareness, opinions about global
warming vary
worldwide,» Gallup (2009), online here; Leiserowitz et al. (2010b) and other work by Leiserowitz's group; Council on Foreign Relations, «Public Opinion on Global Issues» (2011)(no longer available online); Bruce Stokes et al., «Global Concern about Climate Change, Broad Support for Limiting
Emissions,» Pew Research Center, Nov. 5, 2015, online here.
I, personally, have seen nothing to dissuade me from believing that the continued
emission,
worldwide, will result in continued
warming of our one and only home planet.
Here is another one from the Christian Science Monitor titled «Global
warming: Carbon dioxide
emissions worldwide fell in 2009.»
We have a
worldwide CO2 global
warming crisis and American politicians are running around trying to throw money at coal - to - liquid production that as the graph shows, does nothing to reduce carbon
emissions IF they can
We have a
worldwide CO2 global
warming crisis and American politicians are running around trying to throw money at coal - to - liquid production that as the graph shows, does nothing to reduce carbon
emissions IF they can figure out how to sequester the CO2 and over DOUBLES if there is no sequestration.
I responded that the earth would
warm by about 0.5 degrees Celsius in the 21st century if
worldwide emissions of CO2 were cut to zero today.
To keep
warming below 2 °C,
worldwide emissions between 2011 and 2050 would need to be limited to 1,100 gigatons of carbon dioxide.
At this point, even the most optimistic scenarios of
worldwide reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions will not be enough to avoid significant global
warming — and thus the concomitant set of climate impacts that will disrupt our way life — according to a study... Continue reading →
Otherwise greenhouse gas
emissions will push global
warming past 2 ˚C of temperature rise
worldwide, threatening the survival of many people currently living on the planet.