Sentences with phrase «warming hiatus says»

A new theory explaining the global warming hiatus says the world's heat is trapped in the Indian Ocean.

Not exact matches

«What this study addresses is what's better described as a false pause, or slowdown,» rather than a hiatus in warming, says climate scientist Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

Roemmich said the study illustrates that the hiatus in warming of the sea surface and the lower atmosphere is not representative of the steady, continuing heat gain by the climate system.

Is RC saying it is impossible that global warming might pause or not increase as quickly as some models project — that even a brief hiatus threatens the entire theory?

However, I am not sure it is fair to say that the IPCC simulations «failed» to predict the current warming hiatus.

Dan Barrie, program manager at NOAA, called the research «compelling» and said: «[It] provides a powerful illustration of how the remote eastern tropical Pacific guides the behaviour of the global ocean - atmosphere system, in this case exhibiting a discernible influence on the recent hiatus in global warming.»

Just as importantly, he says, the model helps to explain regional trends that seem to defy the global warming hiatus, including record - breaking heat in the United States last year, and the continued decline of Arctic sea ice.

If what you are saying is that the Hiatus is caused by some of the ocean getting cooler and some of the ocean getting warmer that sounds like the ultimate in Ad - Hock ism.

JC said» If the recent warming hiatus is caused by natural variability, then this raises the question as to what extent the warming between 1975 and 2000 can also be explained by natural climate variability.»

Trenbreth says that the Hiatus was caused by the exess heat going into the oceans... that must mean (that last time I took thermodynamics) that the oceans are warming.

«' The 1997 to ’98 El Niño event was a trigger for the changes in the Pacific, and I think that's very probably the beginning of the hiatus,» says Kevin Trenberth... «You can't keep piling up warm water in the western Pacific,» Trenberth says.

The word «hiatus» implies that warming will resume at some point in time but in fact no - one can say with any certainty if this will be in the near future or distant future.

Ole Willy says, «The hiatus in warming observed over the past 16 years demonstrates that CO2 is not a control knob on climate variability on decadal time scales.»

Now stories will read for the new report, «IPCC blames warming hiatus on cooling from ocean cycles, but says ocean cycles have nothing to do with earlier warming».

The two things that Judith claimed, in her utterly dishonest critique of that paper, are mentioned before the thing that she dishonestly told you that the authors had claimed was the sole cause of the «hiatus in warming» when they clearly said «partially,» also right in the Abstract.

Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann said in an email he hopes the new data will put to rest «the silly ongoing claims that global warming has «stopped» or that there is a «hiatus» in global warming.»

The most serious example of a climate scientist not archiving or documenting a critical climate dataset was the study of Tom Karl et al. 2015 (hereafter referred to as the Karl study or K15), purporting to show no «hiatus» in global warming in the 2000s (Federal scientists say there never was any global warming «pause»).

That said, the hiatus since 1998 is warmer than the previous two hiatus periods (the so called stair step), so this brings us back to wondering about «coming out» of the Little Ice Age.

Climate skeptics say this «hiatus» casts doubt on the scientific consensus on climate change, even though the past decade was the warmest on record.

izen says: July 21, 2013 at 10:39 pm «Another five years will determine it either way, the process that has led to the present hiatus is unlikely to persist that long, and the weather extremes that the warmer oceans and shifts in floods and droughts will of course continue.»

Much of the public and scientific discussion around a slowdown, or hiatus, in the rate of global warming has been misguided, says prominent climatologist.

But Peter Wadhams, a professor of ocean physics at the University of Cambridge, UK, called the study careful and persuasive, and said: «I think it shows clearly that the so - called «hiatus» does not exist and that global warming has continued over the past few years at the same rate as in earlier years.»

A consensus about what has put global warming on pause may be years away, but one scientist says the recent papers confirm that Earth's warming has continued during the hiatus, at least in the ocean depths, if not in the air.

LONDON, 26 April, 2017 — A leading climate scientist says claims that there has been a slowdown or hiatus in the rate at which global warming is happening are not supported by statistical evidence.

COP21: Scientists say pressure from climate sceptic voices may have led to credibility being given to the mistaken claim that there is evidence of a hiatus in global warming.

What do you call the mental process which allows a man to say «What's firmly established is that the climate is warming» while also holding that «There's been a burst of worthy research aimed at figuring out what causes the stutter - steps in the process — including the current hiatus / pause / plateau [in warming] ``?

The Arrhenius greenhouse theory has been predicting warming ever since the hiatus started, 17 years ago, but as they themselves say, there has been none at all.

But on its website home page yesterday, Nasa featured a new study which said there was a hiatus in global warming before the recent El Nino, and discussed why this was so.

A warming hiatus of a mere 20 years, they said, was nothing.

Now for other reasons, I believe it may turn out to be a real event, which is why I say my bet is that in fifteen years or so we will look back and say that the rate of warming over those fifteen years was higher than the so called hiatus.

They say» it is plausible, if not likely, that the next 10 years of global temperature change will leave an impression of a «global warming hiatus».»

Curry might say something about the» 76 - ’78 warm phase, but either climate sensitivity is no more her expertise than many amateur bloggers or she is intentionally muddying the waters with a long screed about Balmaseda reanalysis and attacking the strawman of «hiatus = missing heat».

As I might have said before, in IPPC - speak it would be «Although we can not give significance to such a short period of time (14 years), this lack of warming is exactly what we would expect if there were to be a 30 year hiatus» I look forward to next spring / early summer when the first two temperature records cross the 15 year mark of slight cooling.

If the media can finally stop missing the forest for the trees, if they can stop missing the blatantly obvious warming trend everywhere scientists said we would see it because they only stare at a very narrow set of (generally misinterpreted) data, then they should stop repeating the myth of a hiatus or even of a global warming slowdown once and for all.

Explanations for the pause in global warming range from ocean oscillation cycles to Chinese coal plant emissions, volcanic activity to some scientists even saying there is no hiatus in warming.