Sentences with phrase «warming hypothesis»
The phrase "warming hypothesis" refers to the theory that the Earth's temperature is gradually increasing due to human activities, such as burning fossil fuels. It suggests that this increase in temperature is causing climate change and global warming. Full definition
The origins of the global warming hypothesis date to the 19th century.
carlineconomics.com
The anthropogenic global warming hypothesis says ocean heat should increase fairly steadily and uninterrupted (monotonic), barring any volcanic eruptions
As the Spencer - Christy method to measure atmospheric temperatures was being developed — a method that would permit scientists to test the greenhouse gas warming hypothesis in the Charney Report — international organizations did not wait to act.
This process prevents surface temperatures from significantly exceeding threshold levels (and therefore rules out the alarmists» Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming hypothesis in these areas) and controls maximum and minimum temperatures in these areas.
In this report, Shell's message was clear: although it is «not possible to dismiss the global warming hypothesis as scientifically unsound... any policy measure should take into account explicitly the weaknesses in the scientific case.»
Not everyone who subscribes to the current global warming hypothesis wants success in Copenhagen, though.
Besides, the science say there are fewer severe events with the IPCC warming hypothesis.
Recognition of the essential flaw in the dangerous global warming hypothesis predates the IPCC and has been there for the world to see in the title of a paper published in 1966 by CSIRO division of meteorological physics former chief Bill Priestley: «The limitation of temperature in hot climates by evaporation.»
There is no statistical validity for claiming your GHG driven warming hypothesis, as implemented in the models, is confirmed because the observed trend lies «within the squiggles».
Most journalists believe the global warming hypothesis for the simple reason that they are politically predisposed to trust the word of a certain kind of left - wing activist scientist.
I am involved in a community radio program for the unemployed in Wollomngong and last November we started to discuss the fallacy of the carbon dioxide catastrophic glogal warming hypothesis and the catstrophic consequences for employment in Wollongong if ever a price was put on carbon dioxide emissions.
Conclusion: For a tipping point and / or runaway warming to be reached, and then survive, the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis demands that the lower troposphere warms in a consistent and accelerating mode, due to the hypothetical positive atmospheric feedbacks supposedly produced from fossil fuel CO2 emissions.
We are also aware that climate scientists who adhere to the human - induced warming hypothesis have responses to most of these sources of doubt.»
Receiving the answer that no warming followed, and that instead a severe global ice age ended the era, the deductive conclusion would be that the CO2 warming hypothesis was wrong — that CO2 is not dominant in global temperatures.
The anthropogenic global warming hypothesis says ocean heat should increase fairly steadily and uninterrupted (monotonic), barring any volcanic eruptions
Statistical analysis rules out natural - warming hypothesis with more than 99 % certainty.
His conclusion: the natural - warming hypothesis may be ruled out «with confidence levels great than 99 %, and most likely greater than 99.9 %.»
This means that if the GCR - warming hypothesis is correct, this increase in GCRs should actually be causing global cooling over the past five decades, and particularly cold temperatures in recent years.
The galactic cosmic ray (GCR) warming hypothesis is based on the premise that GCRs can «seed» clouds, and clouds reflect sunilight.
Probably the most articulate article is The Global Warming Hypothesis and Ocean Heat by William DiPuccio.
A better approach might be, «What do you need to see in terms of evidence over the next few years to make you more likely to believe the Global Warming hypothesis?»
Finally, given the limitations of climate science (one Earth and all) they should describe what they would consider convincing evidence in favor of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.
And IF this were the basis for the global warming hypothesis, I'd be fighting against it!
Yes, but the polar cooling does flatly contradict the climate models that are the basis of the global warming hypothesis.
The «global warming hypothesis» has been developed according to the principles of sound science.
They are ignoring CLOUD results, just as they ignored Svensmark's decade old excellent work challenging the increasingly feeble, but politically powerful human - global warming hypothesis.