Druyan, L., P. Lonergan, and T. Eichler, 1999: A GCM investigation of global
warming impacts relevant to tropical cyclone genesis.
Not exact matches
Beyond that, I'm not sure about the invoking of the «last fifteen years of science,» but a good reference to support the 1.5 ºC threashold would be Schleussner et al (2015) «Differential climate
impacts for policy -
relevant limits to global
warming: the case of 1.5 ºC and 2ºC»
Differential climate
impacts for policy -
relevant limits to global
warming: the case of 1.5 °C and 2 °C.
At most, as plaintiffs have stated before and will state again at the risk of redundancy, the only
relevant issue in this case with respect to global
warming is the much narrower issue of what
impact, if any, the A.B. 1493 Regulations will have on global
warming.
This article is a first comprehensive assessment of key climate
impacts for the policy
relevant warming levels of 1.5 °C and 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.
What is a fact, is that the fact that the earth
warms and cools over time is not
relevant to the germane issue of our
impact upon future climate right now.
On what specific basis do you disregard the conclusions of the United States Academy of Sciences, and numerous other Academies of Sciences around the World including the Royal Academy of the UK, over a hundred of the most prestigious scientific organizations whose membership includes those with expertise
relevant to the science of climate change, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Institute of Physics, the American Meteorological Society, the Royal Meteorological Society, and according to the American Academy of Sciences, 97 percent of scientists who actually do peer - reviewed research on climate change whose conclusions hold that the Earth is
warming, that the
warming is mostly human caused, that harsh
impacts from
warming are already being experienced in parts of the world, and that the international community is running out of time to prevent catastrophic
warming.
On what specific basis do you disregard the conclusions of the United States Academy of Sciences, and numerous other Academies of Sciences Around the World including the Royal Academy of the UK, over a hundred of the most prestigious scientific organizations whose membership includes those with expertise
relevant to the science of climate change, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Institute of Physics, the American Meteorological Society, the Royal Meteorological Society, and according to the American Academy of Sciences 97 percent of scientists who actually do peer - reviewed research on climate change which conclusions hold that the Earth is
warming, that the
warming is mostly human caused, and that harsh
impacts from
warming are already being experienced in parts of the world, and that the international community is running out of time to prevent catastrophic
warming.
On what specific basis do you disregard the mainstream scientific view that holds that the Earth is
warming, that the
warming is mostly human caused, and that harsh
impacts from
warming are very likely under business - as - usual, conclusions supported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United States Academy of Sciences and over a hundred of the most prestigious scientific organizations in the world whose membership includes scientists with expertise
relevant to the science of climate change including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Institute of Physics, the American Meteorological Society, the Royal Meteorological Society, and the Royal Society of the UK and according to the American Academy of Sciences 97 percent of scientists who actually do peer - reviewed research on climate change?
Rather than the AD pattern being
relevant and
impacting the Beaufort Sea, a key factor for sea ice loss in the last month is the strong continuing positive North Atlantic Oscillation pattern bringing
warm temperatures to the North of Eurasia (Figure 4).
It has relatively little
impact on the longer - term
warming trend, which is the most scientifically
relevant metric of climate change.
Criteria Description Fish Toxicity Measure of the acute toxicity to fish (both saltwater and freshwater) Daphnia Toxicity Measure of the acute toxicity to Daphnia (invertebrate aquatic organisms) Algae Toxicity Measure of the acute toxicity to aquatic plants Persistence / Biodegradation Rate of degradation for a substance in the environment (air, soil, or water) Bioaccumulation Potential for a substance to accumulate in fatty tissue and magnify up the food chain Climatic relevance Measure of the
impact a substance has on the climate (e.g., ozone depletion, global
warming, etc.) Other Any additional characteristic (e.g., soil organism toxicity, WGK water classification, etc.)
relevant to the overall evaluation but not included in the previous criteria 1.3.3 Material Class Criteria The following material classes are flagged due to the concern that at some point in their life cycle they may have negative
impacts on human and environmental health.