Please provide any resources to help explain why short - term experiences of severely cold weather like we have in the U.S. and Great Britain right now are not proofs that global
warming is false.
It was in an obscure, but previously basically legit journal, that stated that suddenly, most accumulated peer - reviewed literature since 1842 about global
warming is false... based on arguments long discredited in the peer - reviewed literature.
I did not ask you to repeat your crank theories (you claimed that Common decent and anthropogenic
warming is false) again.
It can be read as pointing out that Global
Warming is false, or it can be read as pointing out that ignoring Global Warming can be dangerous.
For a method for that, may I encourage you to look at Roy Spencer's recent model on thermal diffusion in the ocean: More Evidence that Global
Warming is a False Alarm: A Model Simulation of the last 40 Years of Deep Ocean Warming June 25th, 2011 See especially his Figure Forcing Feedback Diffusion Model Explains Weak Warming in 0 - 700 m layer as Consistent with Low Climate Sensitivity His model appears to be more accurate than the IPCC's.
I feel like I have to remind people that even if global
warming is false we should always do what we can to conserve our resources and lessen pollution.
However, there are a substantial number of climatologists who believe that the hypothesis of global
warming is false.
To be classified as rejecting, an article had to clearly and explicitly state that the theory of global
warming is false or, as happened in a few cases, that some other process better explains the observed warming.
Regarding eugenics, you forgot the overwhelming similarity that they were both widespread, media - friendly, commonly - believed «facts» that proved to be false (whether or not Global
Warming is false is obviously debatable, but he's operating with that disclaimer when he makes the comparison, and thus it is necessary to operate under it when disputing his claims.)
Not one, I repeat, not one published study stating that human caused global
warming is false has held up to world wide juried peer review to the best of my knowlege.
He claimed to present data that proved global
warming was false.
Not exact matches
Without reconciliation — real reconciliation, not the niceties or
warm momentary feelings or platitudes or head - pats of
false reconciliation that makes us feel better without ever really changing anyone — we
are missing something deeply important about Easter.
With all her endowments, the reason why I still think she has to grow up
is because she associates things, events, people and actions in neat categories of good - bad, wrong - right, true -
false,
warm - cold and so on.
sorry TBT but bearing
false witness and
being a reviler
are both going to lead you to a
warm afterlife.
Well it took a few
false starts, a few days of unseasonably
warm weather, but we
are finally in autumn land.
The fact
is, my child screams for 30 minutes before bed if I hold her and rock her to sleep (ending in tears for both of us after three
false starts, 1 hour of night time sleep, and me going to bed at 8 pm for the 2nd MONTH in a row) or if she
's SAFE,
WARM, HAPPY, WELL FED (from the breast, I might add) and surrounded by the company of her favorite little animals in her crib.
Mars
is not covered in golden sand, of course — this Odyssey
false - color image shows
warmer temperatures in
warm colors and cooler temperatures in cool colors.
«What this study addresses
is what
's better described as a
false pause, or slowdown,» rather than a hiatus in
warming, says climate scientist Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
He
's suggested that the government only gives grants to scientists who convey a
false narrative about
warming.
The main claims of fact he makes in support of his contention that Global
Warming science
is an «idealogy, underpinned by
false assumptions»
are:
The transit signals
were detected in photometric data from the Kepler satellite, and
were confirmed to arise from planets using a combination of large transit - timing variations, radial - velocity variations,
Warm - Spitzer observations, and statistical analysis of
false - positive probabilities.
I
am sure you've seen videos of yogis on Instagram doing uddiyana bandha (pulling our abdomen into our rib cage by taking a
false inhale), which cleanses our organs, stimulates the brain, and
warms up the core for inversions and longer holds.
Of the many ways you can
warm - up your calves, runners tend to like to push against a wall or other vertical object to get a good stretch and give them a feeling of security, as
false as it may
be.
Run & Jump
is an exceptionally well - handled drama about a difficult subject; Enjoyable, accessible and sensitive, without ever succumbing to
false, mawkish sentimentality, with a few brisk laughs and an optimistic, heart -
warming ending.
The starter
is a 10 question true or
false activity to
warm students up with basic facts that they should know.
Boulders beach lies just outside Simon's Town on the far side of
False Bay and despite the fact that this
is supposed to mean
warmer waters, the sea
is pretty icy, particularly as summer wanes.
I THINK THE BEST TIME OF YEAR TO VISIT
IS all year round, BECAUSE even the winters
are warm and we have the most beautiful sunsets across the
False Bay.
Facilities available: - Fully equipped kitchen - Dishwasher - Washing machine - Flatscreen TV HD - Full DStv bouquet - Fireplace - Fully equipped granny flat and kitchen - Tumble dryer - Sun deck chairs and hammock Simon's Town
is situated on the
False Bay coast of the
warm Indian Ocean.
For a Cape Town beach with a unique twist head to Boulders Beach; its soft sand and slightly
warmer sea (Boulders
is on the Indian Ocean's
False Bay coastline)
are home to a large colony of endangered African penguins.
Our sunny north facing and comfortable, three storey home remains pleasantly
warm in our winter periods, accommodates six guests,
is sea facing with spectacular views from our deck across
False bay to Table Mountain and Cape Point.
That
is a
false claim because both satellite and surface data
are consistent in showing that the last year
was the
warmest on record, unless you have some arbitrary fixation with calendar years which doesn't prove anything.
It
is a deliberate lie, scripted by ExxonMobil - funded propaganda mills disguised as «conservative think tanks», that
is demonstrably
false and as such it does not belong in the debate about what to do about anthropogenic global
warming.
In addition, there
is NO plausible alternative possibility for the
warming despite Victor's
false proclamations without supporting evidence.
I also have the same desired results — that global
warming is not happening, and we have nothing to worry about (which I assume
is everyone's desired result)-- but I want the truth about it, not some
false construction.
As a layperson (to climatology, tho not my field), who would
be much more interested in avoiding the
false negative of failing to mitigate a true serious problem, I look at ACC this way: We live in a
warmed &
warming world....
If the US network
were to miraculously somehow
be shown to
be giving
false trends, then you would have to explain how there can
be no
warming in the US when the Australian network shows it clearly across a variety of parameters.
F.Y.I., this statement: «there has
been no statistically significant mean
warming»
is simply
false.
I guess you
're just a member of the «it
was cold yesterday in London, so global
warming must
be false» brigade.
Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski — world - renowned expert on the ancient ice cores used in climate research — says the U.N. «based its global -
warming hypothesis on arbitrary assumptions and these assumptions, it
is now clear,
are false.»
I
'm no more a climate scientist than Lomborg, but even I begin to recognize his creative use of statistics — for example, not mentioning well - established severe weather increases, or creating a
false dilemma between spending to combat global
warming and spending to combat malaria.
The main claims of fact he makes in support of his contention that Global
Warming science
is an «idealogy, underpinned by
false assumptions»
are:
It should
be televised just like Hussein's hanging and we can all show the same mercy on Bush that he did on the 152 deathrow inmates he executed without one inkling of remorse, not to mention the 4000 American's he sent to death under
false pretenses, not to mention the people mentioned in this article likely to bear the worst consequence of global
warming.
Victor's original premise that we do not understand the
warming of the first half of the last century therefore this sheds doubt on AGW
is completely
false.
One of the aspects of «global
warming» that makes it appear so disreputable to some
is the willingness for those who speak for it to do so in alarming, albeit
false tones.
Anyway it
is a
false comparison to compare old temperatures with new temperatures when asking «wht should we do» you need to compare «our solution» with «their solution» If you
are advocating a political strategy you need to accept current proposed strategies will probably still result in the majority of the global
warming predicted in the ordinary scenario (if not all of it — a point which I can argue if you like).
Laypersons, such as Crichton, his readers, and myself, should
be worried more about avoiding
false negatives: doing nothing to abate global
warming, when in fact it
is happening.
But oversimplifying the situation, using misleading information and presenting
false choices
is not useful in the public debate over global
warming.
The hockey stick
is one attempt at doing so because it provides a very visual impression of what
is happening, but this in turn means a lot of people get the
false impression that it
is some kind of cornerstone that the whole of global
warming theory
is built on.
So for laypersons a true negative (we do nothing to reduce GH emissions, and GW
is not happening) would
be much worse economically &
re other environmental problems, than a
false positive (we abate global
warming, when it
is not happening).
You
are also cherry picking a few papers on the early
warming period solar irradiance levels and correlations, so get a
false impression on what its about.