Sentences with phrase «warming issue just»

Most people against the global warming issue just think the government is out for their money... which they are.

Not exact matches

Interesting Pope for sure — but BTW: None of his core beliefs differ AT ALL from the two previous Popes, it's just that his communication style is more focused on everyone's common ground — the other Popes had the same beliefs, it just that they were more outspoken on the controversial issues — so the media did not warm to them as much.

Just as every Easter long - falsified stories about Jesus are warmed up by journalists to increase the print - run of their magazines, so similar nonsense is brought forth whenever issues of science and religion are covered in the media.

Just in time for Bali, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development issued a new crisis report listing the ten cities most due to be flooded by warming - induced sea level rise.

They have various issues that just aren't worth dealing with, but the Ultimate wipes warmer is a great machine that you should be happy with.

Veizer fails to discuss the key issue (namely, whether the data support the idea that the warming trend, rather than just the temporary dip, could be explained by solar cycle variations).

The room for «reasonable doubt» is closing and is (IMHO) just about gone; but even that leaves many issues — e.g. the size of future warming — to settle — William]

But maybe just maybe this is our only oppotunity to reverse the global warming issue by allowing it to strike!

Just a couple of years ago, when I spoke to the North American ski industry, they seem perplexed when I suggested that global warming would become their most important issue.

I have had on and off shoulder issues for years and I know for a fact that most of it stems just purely from not warming up properly and rushing into big weights before my body was ready to lift them.

In this case we use the warm - ups to address technical issues, areas for improvement or just using the warm - up as an opportunity to refine the Power Clean technique.

I am 10 weeks postpartum now, so haven't done warm weather with the extra belly / nursing access issue, but I don't think I'll be wearing just a nursing tank in public even though I don't mind it being tight.

Maybe it's just warming up, maybe there are underlying issues we don't know about (doubtful).

As far as cold vs warm start, just a guess but whatever component is having an issue must be being affected by the raised temperature from the engine saturating it, making it not perform as well.

The soft top is plenty warm enough for the coldest winters (I just went through one without issue) and its plenty quiet enough on the highway (I put on MANY highway miles thus far without a problem.

There was another twist to the hurricanes / global warming issue in Science Express on Friday where a new paper from the Webster / Curry team just appeared.

Reading the article left me with the impression that what Will is against is «Crusading Journalism», and is just using the «Global Cooling / Global Warming» issue to illustrate it.

I just was watching your interview with Michael Shellenberger and reading / listening up on this whole «centrist environmentalist» concept and I have to say, I take issue with people claiming the longtime «left» environmental movement was all about being a culture of restriction and somehow not in tune with the idea that this global warming crisis could lead to newer, alternative, healthy economics of another kind.

The issues of global warmer, decreased wetlands, pollution, and failing infrastructure touch everyone, not just those in New Orleans and here.

Ludwig, I'm just stating the warming issue is no longer a debate.

In ending, I'll just add one point: When Al Gore says that the global warming issue is an immense moral issue, he's right in many ways.

General Wesley Clark has worked hard to emphasize that global warming isn't just an environmental issue, it's a national security issue.

In this video, Stott raises the big issue of «cosmic rays» and its contribution to climate change, but then backs off and says he didn't say it was causing global warming and that it's just a «hot topic» of research.

Veizer fails to discuss the key issue (namely, whether the data support the idea that the warming trend, rather than just the temporary dip, could be explained by solar cycle variations).

After this first blush reading of just this issue, if someone cares about global warming, they should work to see that McCain is nominated on the Republican side.

In the spring of 2015, only 10 percent of Americans viewed global warming as a religious issue; 13 percent thought it was a spiritual issue, and just over a third (36 %) thought it was a moral issue.

The earth has had significant Global Warming for some 20,000 years now... The only real argument is to the degree that mans activity has augmented that... We just came out of one - point - five - million years of continuous glaciation with sheets of two mile thick ice down past the 44th parallel... I will cheerfully deal with warming issues over that, anyWarming for some 20,000 years now... The only real argument is to the degree that mans activity has augmented that... We just came out of one - point - five - million years of continuous glaciation with sheets of two mile thick ice down past the 44th parallel... I will cheerfully deal with warming issues over that, anywarming issues over that, any day...

Speaking of predictions, there's a special issue of Phil Trans A just out, on a 4 degree warmer world.

Just touch the issue, er now non-issue according to the warmers, and move on to something else.

perhaps the environmentally warm and fuzzy conceit of climate change — about which we can really do nothing — is really just a subconscious expression of the much more stark and frightening former — and all too real issue: PEAK OIL.

Aspects of his comment may be unwelcome to just about everyone in one way or another, but I think it is worth noting that he says that the data issues don't detract from clear evidence of a long - term warming trend and that carbon dioxide is «a major climate forcing» (along with many others):

Thus, we can't «just» focus on electing a new president who «gets» global warming and who will show leadership and resolve in addressing it: We also have to elect a Congress that «gets it» and that will work to energetically address the issue.

I just finished signing a petition issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists urging Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to make sure California's new climate plan against global warming is strong.

Another issue with many of these indicators is that they have a long and unknown lag time between a temperature change and the indicator changing; e.g., a glacier might start melting decades before it's retreat is clearly measured, permafrost might have been warming up since the 1930's and just started visibly melting, etc..

They state, in other words, that their results have direct bearing on the global warming issues, issues currently before governments faced with heavy lobbying from wealthy environmentalist groups, and the United Nations, which just this year will arrange around 38 meetings in 17 countries to push the theme, not counting the other enormous resources they have devoted to the theme that humans are destroying the planet.

Just to push the envelope further, the institute issued a press release stating: «Of course, not all global warming alarmists are murderers and tyrants.»

Just over half in the survey, 51 percent, say there is «a lot of disagreement among scientists» over the existence of global warming, down 11 points from 2009 but still higher than the share who say scientists agree with one another on the issue, 43 percent.

As just one example of the issues, we have identified a significant warm bias in the observed analysis; see

But just four days later, he directly undermined his own message, when his administration issued the final permit allowing Shell Oil to drill in the Arctic, despite the administration's own assessment that the chances of a significant oil spill in the area were 75 % — not to mention that a good deal of existing known oil reserves must be left in the ground to protect against global warming.

I only found out about Ecotricity today, and am shocked (though I shouldn't be) that what's happening here clearly demonstrates that «global warming» can't be the real issue, or corporations like EDF would realise that what they are doing ultimately (when actual costs are counted), is increasing their carbon footprint (just think of all the people, documents, transportation that are needed over the course of a court - case).

Former Virginia state climatologist and global warming skeptic Pat Michaels («Hurricane Pat,» as we once fondly dubbed him) pops up in an email as someone that a scientist from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California would like to attack --- and not just in the latest issue of a peer - reviewed journal.

Not just anyone warrants the attention of the European rapid response team: only those who get media attention and refuse to stay «on message» about global warming issues get the Carbon Brief treatment.

Whether you are working on the front lines of the climate issue, immersed in the science, trying to make policy or educate the public, or just an average person trying to make sense of the cognitive dissonance or grapple with frustration over this looming issue, What We Think About When We Try Not To Think About Global Warming moves beyond the psychological barriers that block progress and opens new doorways to social and personal transformation.

My issue is still only with the Man - made Global Warming thing.It really infuriates me that the UN and all main Politicians are now just ignoring the absolute new evidence that: a), there is no warming and b), that CO2 does not harm the earth and life but actually BENEFIWarming thing.It really infuriates me that the UN and all main Politicians are now just ignoring the absolute new evidence that: a), there is no warming and b), that CO2 does not harm the earth and life but actually BENEFIwarming and b), that CO2 does not harm the earth and life but actually BENEFITS IT!!

In 1990, two years after NASA scientist James E. Hansen issued his now famous warning about climate change during a congressional hearing, Lindzen started taking a publicly contrarian stance when he challenged then - senator Gore by suggesting in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society that the case for human - induced global warming was overstated and that natural climate variability could explain things just as easily.

The June 2013 issue of Rolling Stone published some of these utterings, several made by prominent elected officials, in its funny article, «The 10 Dumbest Things Ever Said About Global Warming,» just as likely to draw tears as it is to invoke laughter.

There are other issues that are important to a lot of people and their numbers are increasing as they learn about the other issues: health for humans and animals, job creation, protection of the environment, balance of trade deficit due to imports of oil, preservation of natural resources that have better uses than just being burned, energy independence, global warming, the prestige that early adopters enjoy and the good feeling some people get from knowing that they have made a decision that is good in some way.

flmark: I have written enough about global warming and have pretty much decided not to bother with the issue anymore,... but... HOW WAS YOUR SUMMER????? People just don't get it.Global warming means more SEVERE weather.

I just stated the issue the opposite way: suppose that CO2 and equivalents really do cause warming, but that the sensitivity is low.

Just about the time the global warming issue was being elevated to importance in political and environmental circles.