But if he subsequently took time to read my material after replying to my comment at his article, then it's plausible he's not only realized that this grandiose dream has evaporated, but also that he's now facing the far more real and very bleak prospect of trying to guess who might turn state's evidence against him just to save their own skins in investigations of where the actual «racketeering» in the global
warming issue seemingly appears.
My opinion, supported by the above and a
seemingly endless list of similar examples, the history of CAGW, noting the curricula vitae of the individuals and groups before CAGW became an
issue who are now touting CAGW, and their activities in fields outside of «climate science» is that «Global
Warming», by whatever euphemism is currently in vogue, is not a problem; it is an excuse.