Sentences with phrase «warming junk science»

CEO Rupert Murdoch that the media conglomerate is joining the battle to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the big question here at DeSmogBlog is whether this means Fox News will end its peddling in global warming junk science.

While President Bush's recent public statements seem to indicate that he may also be falling for global warming junk science so far, he's only for voluntary cuts in greenhouse gas emissions as well as «technology - based solutions.

Not exact matches

It's like global warming — you will always find some global warming deniers out there who can quote some little piece of research they have found somewhere, some science junk, but the consensus is there.»

Joe Bastardi, senior AccuWeather.com meteorologist's open letter to presidential candidates concerning anthropogenic global warming will likely be thoroughly ignored by media far more interested in spreading the unproven junk science of Nobel Laureate Al Gore than advancing the discussion concerning this controversial issue.

Please post a list of the supposed benefits of global warming (GW which you also defend does not exist)-- it is so much fun to debunk junk science.

I've met many people who think global warming is junk science and even more that just don't seem to care at all.

Junk Science: Al Gore blames the Burma tragedy on global warming despite growing evidence to the contrary.

Prominent global warming advocates Michael Mann and Tom Wigley then tried to smear Soon as hard as they could so he wouldn't publish, reports Junk Science

He has spoken often for DDP, on such topics as global warming in courts, the litigation epidemic, that litigation and junk science helped bring down the World Trade Center, and that great thinkers are almost entirely created via home schooling.

The days of many politicians being conned by the junk science of the warming alarmists is almost over.

So should I call your «denier» stance «junk conspiracy science» even though we agree on the warming issue?

We're winning the information war, but the «Church of Global Warming» isn't giving up the ghost just yet and we need to keep countering the junk science and hysteria with facts and reason.

Milloy ran a Web site called Junk Science, joined in time by Climate Audit and Ice Cap and a thousand others, all hammering the same message — ignore global warming.

Junk Science is calling BS on Obama's claim today that his daughter Malia is a victim of global warming, having suffered an asthma attack in pre-school because of it.

Just an idea but the British could continue funding global warming research and the UK's elderly can continue burning the filing cabinets full of junk science every winter to keep warm.

Myrrh, unless you can show that radiation from the sun does not warm the earth, you are wasting your time, just spouting junk - science.

Reminds me of reading on Steve Milloy's site, Junk Science, how mankind's contribution was around 25 % of climate warming.

The recent listing of polar bears as «endangered» was based on junk science and GIGO computer models that claim manmade global warming will send the bears» record population numbers into oblivion.

A news release announcing the lawsuit claimed that various procedural rules had been violated during the process of developing the report, labeling it «junk science» and a «$ 14 million compilation of global warming scare stories.»

So true... Fear of global warming has been great for academia and the Left from the beginning because it, «makes industry and capitalism look bad while affording endless visuals of animals and third - world humans suffering at the hands of wealthy Westerners,» as Van Dyke noticed, plus: «Best of all, being driven by junk - science that easily metamorphoses as required, it appeared to be endlessly self - sustaining.»

The Air Vent All Models are Wrong Bart Verheggen Bernie Lewin Better Figures by Doug McNeall The Blackboard Bob Tisdale Cameron Rose Center for Energy and Environment, Competitive Enterprise Institute Center for Global Food Issues, Hudson Institute Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, The Heartland Institute Climate audit by Steve McIntyre The Climate Bet Climate Depot by Marc Morano Climate in Review, by C. Jeffery Small Climate Lessons Climate Policy, The Heritage Foundation Climate Resistance Climate Scientists» Register ClimateWiki Collide - a-Scape (Discover Magazine) Cooler Heads Digest Digging in the Clay by Verity Jones E-FACT Report by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) GlobalClimateScam.com Global Science Report GlobalWarming.org Global Warming, Cato Institute Green World Trust by Lucy Skywalker Gust of Hot Air by Jonathan Lowe Harmless Sky Haunting the Library ICECAP by Joseph D'Aleo International Climate Science Coalition International Conferences on Climate Change, The Heartland Institute Joe Bastardi JoNova, hosted by Joanne Nova Judy Curry Junk Science by Steve Milloy Master Resource Met Office Mike Hulme Nigel Calder Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change by Craig Idso et al..

The claim «that 90 % of AGW warming is going into the oceans» is the worst sort of junk science.

Otherwise, we junk up the argument with stuff that has nothing to do with climate science and it's use in proving CAGW warming in the future.

But, the «Original Sin» associated with the heterogeneous mess of the surface temperature record was perpetrated by James Hansen et el in the early 1980's when they decided to use the surface temperature record to prove and / or justify their «junk science» claims of CO2 causing Anthropogenic Global Warming / Climate Change.

So far, all we have is junk science, wrt «climate change,» «global warming,» and even «warming due to addition of GHGs.»

The global warming scare is dying because the science behind it is just junk.

Not only did you attack my comment on the basis of my fairly offhand reference to hydrocarbon formation, (my intial comment primarily related to the dead zone off the Oregon coast and its possible causes and effects) you used my comment to claim that this website, which is one of the few places where unbiased scientific discussion of global warming appears outside of strictly academic circles, has «way too much junk science».

The issue we face of extreme importance is why global warming is being marketed to the masses worldwide supported by junk science and government funding.

In a February 6, 2006 article entitled «Smoked Out: Pundit for Hire», Paul D. Thacker of The New Republic reported that non-profit organizations operated by Fox News «Junk Science» commentator Steven Milloy from his home had received money from ExxonMobil while Milloy attacked research on global warming.

People who expected all along that global warming was junk science, that they would rather have good jobs and inexpensive energy than pursue some liberal dream of, you know, replacing all fossil fuel with wind and solar power.»