Not exact matches
introduced
legislation directing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to study the environmental impact of black carbon and the most
cost - effective ways to reduce its emissions to improve public health and reduce global
warming.
An unfortunate aspect of economic analyses of the impacts of carbon pricing is that they usually only consider the
costs of such
legislation, while ignoring the benefits associated with slowing global
warming.
«Any one of the several new or likely regulatory initiatives for CO2 emissions from power plants — including state carbon controls, E.P.A.'s regulations under the Clean Air Act, or the enactment of federal global
warming legislation — would add a significant
cost to carbon - intensive coal generation,» the letters said... Selective disclosure of favorable information or omission of unfavorable information concerning climate change is misleading.
And they are right to do so since the proposed
legislation to fight «gloabl
warming» will
cost the taxpayers of the west trillions of Dollars.