I replied that it was simple: the nuclear plant models were about control whereas the global
warming models merely had to convince me we'd get into an uncontrollable state.
Not exact matches
It's unclear if the Bronco will be
merely a
warmed - over Everest or a completely new
model riding on the same chassis, but Hinrich's comments give us hope that it will be the latter.
I note that if CO2
merely amplifies
warming then the reasons for
warming remain unquantified and this casts doubt upon climate
models.
It can't be said too often that climate
models are
merely contrivances meant to project a future
warming trend indefinitely.
Because the alleged IPCC «consensus» is so widely trusted, many climate scientists who haven't studied man - made global
warming theory or the predictions of the computer
models assume that they must be reliable
merely «because the IPCC says so», rather than checking for themselves.
The bottom line is that Wilson was not suggesting that solar activity is responsible for more
warming than we think, or greenhouse gases less, but
merely asking the question «what if
models weight solar irradiance more strongly?»
It seems to me this exercise
merely shows that the original
model was wrong in more fundamental ways, such as having an ECS that is too high to reproduce historical
warming.
I'm
merely pointing out that the physical
model of greenhouse gas induced
warming over the last 165 years is an excellent fit to the data, one that is even better when one adds an purely empirical «natural» variation on top of it.
Since those earliest temperatures are
merely modeled from data presumably collected elsewhere, early temperatures are susceptible to the «
modeling whim du jour» and in this case the 2015
model had created a steeper 20th century
warming trend in just 2 years.
The fact that England, et al., can claim the «robust nature of twenty - first century
warming projections» and «increased confidence «in IPCC projections, when their
models are obviously incapable of resolving the climate energy state,
merely shows that they can have no understanding whatever of the source of physical meaning.
Warming at the very much reduced rate that measured (as opposed to
merely modeled) results suggest would be 0.7 - 0.8 K (1.3 - 1.4 F °) at CO2 doubling.