warming not comparable to recent days, especially with Arctic ice, I am not aware of any historical descriptions comparable to ice conditions now a days, from 1900 to 1950, or from 1985 backwards...
Not exact matches
There is something dated, surely, about this talk of natures, and forms, and essences; our minds misgive us lest they should be a mere ornament,
not a weapon of our thought,
comparable to those brightly polished
warming pans that hang, unused, on the walls of an old inn that has been «done up» - at best, like an old stoup now used for an ash tray.
While they are
not suggesting the world will
warm overall, according to their model the local changes are
comparable in magnitude to those associated with a doubling of CO2.
However, Petrenko found that the gradual, natural global
warming and rapid regional
warming that characterized the deglaciation 12,000 years ago — events that were in some aspects
comparable to the current human - driven global
warming — did
not trigger detectable releases of methane from these reservoirs.
However, one of the panel's reservations was that ``... a statistical method used in the 1999 study was
not the best and that some uncertainties in the work «have been underestimated,»...» The panel concluded «Based on the analyses presented in the original papers by Mann et al. and this newer supporting evidence, the committee finds it plausible that the Northern Hemisphere was
warmer during the last few decades of the 20th century than during any
comparable period over the preceding millennium.
Beyond isn't the most unique polish; it's a
warm gray holo, but still pretty
comparable to early indie holos — Blue - Eyed Girl Lacquer «s Don't Worry, I Don't Bite is one that comes to mind.
Hers is less bulky but it's still
warm yet it's
not as
comparable to a puffer coat.
We also know that there have been periods in the past during which CO2 levels and temperatures have been
comparable to what they are today, yet do
not understand the mechanisms behind those
warm periods with coincident high CO2.
To make things even more difficult, the current rate of
warming is
not comparable with previous periods, where greenhouse gas increases were much slower.
This is the linchpin: if the difference between pre-industrial and modern temperatures is
not as dramatic as this analysis indicates — i.e. if modern GLOBAL temperatures are
comparable to those of the Medieval
Warm Period (named for a REGIONAL phenomenon)-- then there is little need for urgency.
I am just a reader, no competence in the science, don't know if the magnitudes are at all
comparable for mixing and
warming / cooling.
The anomaly I chose was the one that showed
comparable warming, but
not the one that lined up with the data back in 1905.
Warming expected with a BAU scenario is not at all comparable to warming caused by actions already taken, i.e., warming in the pipeline resulting from past emi
Warming expected with a BAU scenario is
not at all
comparable to
warming caused by actions already taken, i.e., warming in the pipeline resulting from past emi
warming caused by actions already taken, i.e.,
warming in the pipeline resulting from past emi
warming in the pipeline resulting from past emissions.
The radiative forcing is
not the same thing as the radiative imbalance, and the numbers aren't at all
comparable in this way, since the imbalance decays to zero as the planet gets
warmer (even if positive or negative feedbacks dominate).
«I would say, and I don't think I'm going out on a very big limb, that the data as we have it does
not support a
warming... I personally feel that the likelihood over the next century of greenhouse
warming reaching magnitudes
comparable to natural variability seems small»
- Why have
comparable warm water currents
not appeared in the Southern Hemisphere, under the influence of the global
warming, to reduce Antarctic sea ice / ice Volume as it has in the Arctic?
Which is why past
warming from total solar irradiance, solar UV irradiance, cosmic ray flux, Milankovitch cycles etc. is
not necessarily
comparable with current
warming.
I do
not think there is a consensus among so - called global
warming skeptics
comparable to the consensus formed in IPCC (2001).
Taken together, the data: 1) do
not support the summer insolation hypothesis to explain Holocene glacier fluctuations in southernmost Patagonia; 2) confirm paleobotanical evidence for a
warm, dry early Holocene; and 3) suggest that some glaciers in the region reached extents
comparable to those of the Little Ice Age shortly before 5.29 e5.05 ka.
(GISS) Doesn't explain why HadCRU shows
comparable warming, or why satellites — even those run by Christy and Spencer — show
comparable warming.
«Scientists were quick to declare the results of the Turner et al paper, which covered 1 per cent of the Antarctic continent, did
not negate a long - term
warming because of man - made climate change... «Climate model projections forced with medium emission scenarios indicate the emergence of a large anthropogenic regional
warming signal,
comparable in magnitude to the late - 20th - century peninsula
warming, during the latter part of the current century,» the Turner research concluded.»
That conclusion is based
not on climate models or recent trends in forest fires, but rather on records of forest fires that occurred more than a millennium ago, during the Medieval Climate Anomaly, a period when global temperatures were
comparable to what they are today, and about half a degree
warmer (on the Celsius scale) than they had been for several centuries prior.
a BP, when Salix arctica, which is considered a warmth - loving plant, had a maximum,» that (3) «comparisons with Holocene records from East and North Greenland show similar immigration histories and similar trends, with the Little Ice Age as the coldest period during the Holocene, culminating about 150 years ago,» and that (4) «subsequent
warming does
not indicate environmental conditions
comparable to the HTM yet at this stage.»
He explained that while the planet has
warmed 1 degree Celsius over the past century, Texas has
not had a
comparable temperature increase, so what happened in 2011 couldn't have been predicted.
«Although Lamb (1965) did
not argue for a globally synchronous
warm period, his characterization has often been taken out of context, and used to argue for global scale warmth during the early centuries of the millennium
comparable to or greater than that of the latter 20th century»
Gates, you can't say that data from recently - introduced and superior measuring instruments shows on a daily basis «how significant the modern
warming is,» because you have no
comparable prior data with which to compare it.