Not exact matches
Doesn't
mean the
globe isn't
warming, it
means I happen to live in a place where the effects
of La Nina are quite strong.
You might expect to see heat waves on the list — even though climate and weather are two different (but related) phenomena — but the report is a good reminder
of the tremendous scope
of problems a
warming globe can cause; it's not just about an extra couple degrees and wearing fewer sweaters: «With
warming temperatures, the breeding cycle
of malaria - carrying mosquitoes is shortening, which
means more mosquitoes — and malaria — each year.»
Global
warming would
of course
mean — averaged over the whole
globe.
That
means that even though 2015 is the
warmest year on record for the
globe, 2016 may be even
warmer, even if the El Nino ends before the year is half over (due to the 3 - 6 delay
of the global
warming relative to the El Nino).
The new twist in this story is that the Arctic has been
warming at at least double the pace
of the rest
of the
globe,
meaning that the difference in temperature between the Arctic and areas farther south has been shrinking.
Once such an IPCC exposition
of the assumptions, complications and uncertainties
of climate models was constructed and made public, it would immediately have to lead, in my view, to more questions from the informed public such as what does calculating a
mean global temperature change
mean to individuals who have to deal with local conditions and not a global average and what are the assumptions, complications and uncertainties that the models contain when it comes to determining the detrimental and beneficial effects
of a «global»
warming in localized areas
of the
globe.
Concensus AGW science predicts «X» as a consequence
of «A.» But that doesn't
mean it has to happen — it's still possible that AGW is sound but there something quirky about the Arctic that they missed, or that the changes will happen more slowly than expected, so it won't
warm faster than the
globe and / or sea ice won't decline.
But just as an example
of what I
mean about the entire subject, this simple explanation for the Arctic «
warming faster than the rest
of the
globe»
Please note in order to avoid perpetuating the mythology that colder than normal temps in some areas
mean global
warming is not happening — global
warming affects the flow
of the gulf stream among other things,
meaning that while some areas
of the
globe become unusually hot, others can become unusually cold — witness recent killer freezes in Europe — global
warming is to blame for these effects.
Back in 2007, the IPCC said it was «more likely than not» (
meaning, a greater - than -50-percent probability) that human activities — through global
warming — were contributing to an observed intensification
of hurricanes in at least some regions
of the
globe.
And at worst, it also cooled the
globe from at least 1965 to 1980, which
means that CO2
warming in that period was actually much greater than is evidenced by the current temperature record, but will not measurable until one full cycle
of negative / positive AMO plays out.
It is tempting but incorrect to think GW
means uniform
warming in all regions
of the
globe.
The Google Map tour is part
of the CalADAPT initiative, which hopes to provide a way to visualize changes so that politicians - and everyone - can really see and understand what climate change
means to our state and our
globe, so that they may take more impactful steps to prevent further
warming.
That
means that anthropogenic aerosols have been a mitigating factor when it comes to the
warming of the
globe over the past century.