Sentences with phrase «warming of the past»

«The most recent 10 - year interval (1999 — 2008) was the warmest of the past 200 decades,» they wrote.

It is very much the mainstream view in the climate research community that you can not explain the warming of the past few decades without anthropogenic and human influences on climate.

I am ready and willing to examine the possibility that greenhouse gases produced the warming of the past 130 years, and that the future of the world is in jeopardy with further CO2 emissions — provided that sufficient technical proof is provided.

Abstract: Analyses of underground temperature measurements from 358 boreholes in eastern North America, central Europe, southern Africa, and Australia indicate that, in the 20th century, the average surface temperature of Earth has increased by about 0.5 degrees C and that the 20th century has been the warmest of the past five centuries.

1,3 °C Spencer 2018 Scenario: only 70 % of the warming of the past 150 years is anthropogenic.

Already there are numerous indications of substantial effects in response to warming of the past few decades.

One question: on «Most will be aware, for example, that the conclusion that the past few decades are likely the warmest of the past millennium — i.e. the conclusion of the best - known of Mike's papers in Nature and Geophysical Research Letters — has never been seriously challenged.»

Most will be aware, for example, that the conclusion that the past few decades are likely the warmest of the past millennium — i.e. the conclusion of the best - known of Mike's papers in Nature and Geophysical Research Letters — has never been seriously challenged.

Abstract: Analyses of underground temperature measurements from 358 boreholes in eastern North America, central Europe, southern Africa, and Australia indicate that, in the 20th century, the average surface temperature of Earth has increased by about 0.5 degrees C and that the 20th century has been the warmest of the past five centuries.

That would mean we've almost completely reversed the warming of the past century, which naive reporters and pseudo-scientists («climatologists») attribute to accumulation of greenhouse gases.

«That you can't support your claims with any substantive body of research...» The empirical data shows that natural climate variability is still the primary cause of the climate warming of the past century.

What they find is that the 20th century is the warmest of the past five centuries.

What they find is that the 20th century is the warmest of the past five centuries with the strongest warming trend in 500 years.

For more than 3 1/2 years, I've been presenting how sea surface temperature data indicates that ENSO is the primary cause of the warming of the past 3 decades.

Competition between a modest positive peak in the AMO and a substantially negative - trending PMO are seen to produce a slowdown or «false pause» in warming of the past decade.

However, on the RSS satellite dataset, the global warming of the past 23 years is statistically indistinguishable from zero.

«Global warming of the past 30 years is over» — July 20, 2008 — By Geologist Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Emeritus Professor at Western Washington University, who has authored eight books and 150 journal publications.

Most of the warming of the past half - century is due to human activities.

If there have been 15 year flat stretches of no warming due to natural variability over the past century, and if most of the warming of the past century has taken place since the 1950s, then the flat stretches due to natural variability should be getting shorter.

Box 9.2 Climate Models and the Hiatus in Global Mean Surface Warming of the Past 15 Years «The observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) has shown a much smaller increasing linear trend over the past 15 years than over the past 30 to 60 years (Section 2.4.3, Figure 2.20, Table 2.7; Figure 9.8; Box 9.2 Figure 1a, c).

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180103160129.htm «Our precision is about 0.2 ºC (0.4 ºF) now, and the warming of the past 50 years is only about 0.1 ºC,»

Why is it that Time magazine feels the need to point out that a report produced by the Indian government has its critics, yet searches for no critics to undercut the words of the head of China's Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, who declares «The warming of the past 20 years is getting more and more intense»?

As it turns out, the IPCC's latest ensemble of climate models produce estimates that overshoot the warming of the past 20 years by 100 % and of the last 15 years by 300 %.

Well, in a nutshell, the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, which is at the center of modern climate - doomsday scenarios, can not explain the powerful warming of the past.

I believe that greenhouse gases probably contributed to the warming of the past 120 years, but sufficient technical proof does not exist as to how much.

Models reproduce (and have in fact predicted) the warming of the past forty years well.

... past climate changes were natural in origin (see FAQ 6.1), whereas most of the warming of the past 50 years is attributable to human activities.

When this is done, the global warming of the past 50 years is still apparent.

Many lines of evidence show that the warming of the past 50 years is primarily due to human activity.

Despite small differences, they still yield the same essential conclusion: the past 10 - to 20 - year period was likely the warmest of the past millennium.

It is very much the mainstream view in the climate research community that you can not explain the warming of the past few decades without anthropogenic and human influences on climate.

While scientists continue to refine projections of the future, observations unequivocally show that climate is changing and that the warming of the past 50 years is primarily due to human - induced emissions of heat - trapping gases.

Multiple lines of independent evidence confirm that human activities are the primary cause of the global warming of the past 50 years.

I should tell you that my own evidence collected over the past two years clearly proves that the warming of the past 4 decades was natural or largely natural and I challenge you to prove to me (considering at least as many data as went past my eyes) that the warming over the past 4 decades was largely not natural.

The global warming of the past 50 years is primarily due to human activities.

The global warming of the past 50 years is primarily due to human activities, predominantly the burning of fossil fuels.»

Many lines of independent evidence demonstrate that the rapid warming of the past half - century is due primarily to human activities.

Bart, Show us the dangerous warming of the past that caused any of the problems your community claims will be caused by CO2.

Already there are numerous indications of substantial effects in response to warming of the past few decades.

«Another unusual aspect of recent climate change is its cause: past climate changes were natural in origin, whereas most of the warming of the past 50 years is attributable to human activities.»

[Poitou & Bréon] Over the first 700 m there is surely no decrease of the oceanic heat content, even if the recent warming is less than the warming of past decades: on the figure below in green, the time span since 2003 carefully selected by sceptics to support their talks

«Our precision is about 0.2 ºC (0.4 ºF) now, and the warming of the past 50 years is only about 0.1 ºC,» he said, adding that advanced equipment can provide more precise measurements, allowing scientists to make better calculations going forward.

The Earth is warming on average, and most of the global warming of the past half - century can very likely be attributed to human influence.

That is not to deny the possibility that CO2 may have contributed something to the warming of the past half - century: indeed, it may even have contributed as much as half the warming, or less than 0.4 K, as the IPCC suggests.

However, the Prudent Path authors fail to reference a recent paper (Kaufmann et al. 2009) which analyzed Arctic temperature changes over a 2000 year period (0 to 1999 AD) and concluded that «the most recent 10 - year interval (1999 - 2008) was the warmest of the past 200 decades» and that «4/5 of the warmest decades occurred during the last century».

Yes, other factors have been in play in the past, but the warming of the past 150 years or so has been the direct result of CO2 increases (as well as increases in other greenhouse gases) due to human activity.

«The warming of the past several decades has been faster and risen to higher temperatures in the past decades than has been seen in thousands of years.

The report is intriguing because the AP provided their data to four independent statisticians without telling them what it was, and all four found that the slower warming of the past decade was statistically insignificant with respect to the actual data.

That's an incredibly strong fact supporting that the warming of the past century is not part of any natural cycle.

It is well established through formal attribution studies that the global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to human - induced increases in heat - trapping gases.