Sentences with phrase «warming over the last few decades»

Given all the independent lines of evidence pointing to average surface warming over the last few decades (satellite measurements, ocean temperatures, sea - level rise, retreating glaciers, phenological changes, shifts in the ranges of temperature - sensitive species), it is highly implausible that it would lead to more than very minor refinements to the current overall picture.
Recent work (e.g., Hurrell 1995, 1996; Thompson and Wallace 1998; Corti et al., 1999) has suggested that the observed warming over the last few decades may be manifest as a change in frequency of these naturally preferred patterns (Chapters 2 and 7) and there is now considerable interest in testing the ability of climate models to simulate such weather regimes (Chapter 8) and to see whether the greenhouse gas forced runs suggest shifts in the residence time or transitions between such regimes on long time - scales.
Two - thirds of Americans (67 %) say there is solid evidence that the earth has been getting warmer over the last few decades, a figure that has changed little in the past few years.
Certainly some parts of the world have shown little or no warming over the last few decades and some appear to be cooling.

Not exact matches

«I would say it is significant that temperatures of the most recent decade exceed the warmest temperatures of our reconstruction by 0.5 degrees Fahrenheit, having few — if any — precedents over the last 11,000 years,» Marsicek says.
However, one of the panel's reservations was that ``... a statistical method used in the 1999 study was not the best and that some uncertainties in the work «have been underestimated,»...» The panel concluded «Based on the analyses presented in the original papers by Mann et al. and this newer supporting evidence, the committee finds it plausible that the Northern Hemisphere was warmer during the last few decades of the 20th century than during any comparable period over the preceding millennium.
A globally warm medieval period could be a simple forced response to increased solar, in which case it doesn't imply any larger intrinsic variability than already assumed, and since solar has been pretty much constant over the last 50 years, improvements to our understanding of solar forced climate changes are irrelevant for the last few decades.
Computer model simulations tend to capture the slow rate of warming in the western Pacific over the last few decades, but they show the warm pool heating rapidly in the future.
Attitudes won't change the fact that the Earth has already warmed about 0.7 C over the past century and mostly in the last few decades, and the warming has been accelerating.
I would say it is significant that temperatures of the most recent decade exceed the warmest temperatures of our reconstruction by 0.5 degrees Fahrenheit, having few — if any — precedents over the last 11,000 years.
If anything, nature has been pushing to cool the climate over the last few decades, but warming has occurred.
For example, some «skeptics» who don't understand anomalies are worried that the dropout of lots of cold weather stations in Siberia over the last few decades has biased the record warm.
Despite the extreme cold of the last ice age, the BRT reported «more than 20 so - called Dansgaard - Oeschger oscillations have been documented... each with rapid warming to near inter-glacial temperatures over just a few decades
-LSB-...] blog by global warming advocate Michael Mann, creator of the now - discredited «hockey stick» graph that purported to show a sharp spike in global temperatures over the last few decades.
Doe this mean that the National Research Council should / will revisit their conclusion: «Based on the analyses presented in the original papers by Mann et al. and this newer supporting evidence, the committee finds it plausible that the Northern Hemisphere was warmer during the last few decades of the 20th century than during any comparable period over the preceding millennium»???
Kev, I think that the Earth has been warming slightly over the last few decades and also that soon (sooner rather than later) the Earth will drastically cool.
The scientific pivot to cooling confirms what many have thought and said over the last few decades: human CO2 emissions do have a warming influence on global temperatures but, with that said, it is a minor factor that is easily overwhelmed by both solar / cosmic and natural earthly forces.
Following a warming trend early in the 20th century and mid-century cooling, surface air temperatures in the Arctic have shown a strong increase over the last few decades, warming at about twice the global average.
He thinks most of the warming is caused by reduced cloud cover over the last few decades.
However, mounting evidence against climate change theory and the «consensus» is unlikely to stem the tide of policy designed to combat global warming, thanks to the sheer size of the climate change industry that has built up over the last few decades.
Over the last few decades of global warming, sun and climate have been moving in opposite directions.
While surface temperature show a significant warming over western Himalayas in the last few decades, the observed regional precipitation changes are irregular and not spatially coherent.
If you want even more info about the study and want to know how the NOAA team came to its conclusion that there has not been a slowdown in warming over the last decade or so, you will find links to a few places where you can start your reading below the chart.
I presume that's why he posted the comment he did: if a reconstruction of the temperature record fails to show warming for the Arctic over the last few decades, it's probably suspect.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z