Sentences with phrase «warming pause»

That has never come close to occurring during our modern warm period, and the ongoing global warming pause suggests that is unlikely to begin happening any time in the foreseeable future, either.

Yet for the global warming pause period stretching from 1998 to 2014, significant adjustments (see right chart) apparently had to be made, stat.

So after all, the global warming pause still remains somewhat of a puzzle.

To believe this was not done and that we have to guess and change the data to erase the global warming pause seems a far stretch from what people think of as science.

Even before the recent global warming pause, temperatures were warming at a relatively modest pace.

To be charitable (and to overlook all the cherry - picking and decline - hiding), the turn - of - the - century climate alarmists who failed to foresee the current 17 - year warming pause might reasonably plead that it was an «unknown unknown» - something they didn't know they didn't know.

Articles: The climate warming pause goes AWOL (or not)

«The climate warming pause goes AWOL (or not),» American Thinker, June 4, 2015.

(Related: «Does Global Warming Pause Debate Miss Big Picture?»)

Gavin Schmidt, a climate scientist with NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, told National Geographic that focus on a global warming pause over the past 15 years is a «misplaced» distraction that misses the big picture.

Using a duration that short to analyze fluctuations in global temperature would show that global warming paused more than a third of the time over the past 30 years, even as the planet's average temperature increased by 1.1 degrees Fahrenheit.

Warming paused sometime in 1998 - 2000.

Nonetheless, even while declaring itself more confident than ever that most global warming is man - made (despite the ongoing 16 - year warming pause that consensus climatologists did not anticipate and still struggle to explain), the IPCC is also more confident that no warming - induced catastrophes will occur during the 21st Century.

Jochem Marotzke and Piers M. Forster have now explained the warming pause in terms of random fluctuations arising from chaotic processes in the climate system.

Climate skeptics often make precisely this claim, citing the warming pause as evidence.

Steve Rintoul, a researcher at Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, or CSIRO, said findings of ocean warming above 6,500 feet in the Jet Propulsion Lab's study explain the recent slowdown in warming at the Earth's surface, which is sometimes called global warming hiatus, or warming pause.

That includes significant cuts to the National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, which has produced research that disproved the notion of a global warming pause.

The warming pause has been «exploited by climate skeptics to refute global warming,» the paper states.

One group, led by Bala Rajaratnam at Stanford University, found even stronger evidence against a global warming pause.

One earlier post informed me that the warming pause in the 1950's and 1960's was caused by the presence of aerosols What then caused the, «on schedule» beginning of another pause shortly after 2000?

This study is important because it advances the accuracy of monitoring temperatures worldwide, and provides insight into the highly publicized «global warming pause.»

In these data curves I can not see a particularly striking or significant current «warming pause», even though the warming trend from 1998 is of course less than the long - term trend.

If you fill these data gaps using satellite measurements, the warming trend is more than doubled in the widely used HadCRUT4 data, and the much - discussed «warming pause» has virtually disappeared.

A media analysis has shown that at least in the U.S., about half of all reports about the new IPCC report mention the issue of a «warming pause», even though it plays a very minor role in the conclusions of the IPCC.

06Oct09 A warming pause?

In this model calculation, there is a «warming pause» in the last 15 years, but in no way does this imply that further global warming is any less.

For 1997 - 2012 these data show a relatively small warming trend of only 0.05 °C per decade — which has often been misleadingly called a «warming pause».

The public debate about the alleged «warming pause» was misguided from the outset, because far too much was read into a cherry - picked short - term trend.

That would go a long way to countering the damage the «warming pause» message has done in regard to action on climate change.

Given the warm temperature of 2014, we already see the meme emerge in the media that «the warming pause is over».

As soon as the warming paused and kept pausing and they had to change the name of their religion from Global Warming to Climate Change, we KNEW they would eventually backpeddle on CO2 and here it is.

The articles did subsequently discuss ocean warming, but the initial framing of the supposed «global warming pause» is bound to confuse readers.

Lovelock is a rare example of an over-alarmist, who then overreacted to what seemed to him like a warming pause in 2012.