Sentences with phrase «warming pause over»

Gavin Schmidt, a climate scientist with NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, told National Geographic that focus on a global warming pause over the past 15 years is a «misplaced» distraction that misses the big picture.

Not exact matches

On the warm afternoon of Labor Day, five days before Nebraska would open its football season with a 55 - 14 pasting of Michigan State, Cornhuskers junior defensive end Grant Wistrom paused as he left the practice field in Lincoln and pondered the ribbon of greatness that stretched back over two years.

When the blood had finally stopped draining, Ralph filled a plastic washbasin with warm soapy water from a jug and scrubbed his hands carefully, leisurely, precisely, pausing even to clean the soap from beneath his fingernails with a smaller pocketknife — and when he was done, Bruce poured a gallon jug of clean water over Ralph's hands and wrists to rinse the soap away, and then Ralph dried his hands and arms with a clean towel and emptied out the old bloody wash water, then filled it anew, and it was time for Bruce to do the same.

I find concerned liberals are loath to talk about how consistently wrong climate models have been or about the «pause» in global warming that has gone on for over fifteen years, while climate skeptics avoid discussion of things like ocean acidification and accelerated melting in Greenland and the Arctic.

So declaring the pause to be «over» will require continued warming.

Among all the main land based records (NOAA, GISSTEMP, HADCRUT4, C&W) and the two satellite records, over the duration of the pause, UAH shows the largest warming trend and RSS the lowest.

In addition other phenomena have been identified which can contribute to pause in warming and explain it two times over — increased aerosals, a solar minimum plus the missing data in the Arctic.

Claiming 2014 to be the hottest by a smidge when the year is not over is an effort to pretend the pause (lack of ss warming) does not exist.

We often hear from the media that the (surface air) warming has slowed or paused over the past 15 years.

During the hearing, Cruz said a lot of completely false things, but two things he hammered over and again were the reliability of satellite data, and how those data don't show any warming over the past 18 years * — the so - called pause.

And as Figure 2 demonstrates, there has been absolutely no pause over the past couple of decades in the warming found in the upper 700 meters of the ocean.

Over the past year, the myth of the global warming «pause» has become a favorite among climate contrarians.

For example, see the whole «global warming pause» meme, which said that global warming had paused because the linear trend was statistically insignificant over some time period.

The standard rejoinder to skeptics is: «Just wait, once the pause is over, global warming will resume, and then your criticism that IPCC models are tuned too hot will collapse.»

Half of the warming in the 20th century occurred before CO2 was a problem, yet no on in the scientific community has a reason for this, and the pause has continued with an increase of 8 % of CO2 in the atmosphere, there is still no credible explanation for it, and it actually took the climate science community over a decade to admit there was one.

There has been much speculation about how the report will address an apparent decrease in the rate of warming over the past few years, dubbed a «global warming pause.»

Yep, the Pacific has been crazy warm for over a year, and in fact has been showing decadal increases in heat content for over 50 years, really only pausing for Pinatubo.

Let's hope «the pause» in global warming does not last much longer since it unfortunately seems to project a cooling regime over the U.S.

What is the evidence that you use to conclude that we are in a warming phase — and what evidence do you use to determine whether that phase might not have paused or even ended over the last 100 or 50 years?

The planet warmed by 0.6 degrees over the prior 50 years, but occasional, unexplained temperature fluctuations of as much as 0.3 degrees countered the rise at times and resulted in apparent pauses.

The most obvious explanation for the striking failure of most climate models to account for the pause in warming over the past decade is that the value of ∆ T2 is much smaller than the IPCC value.

«The world is over 400 parts per million of carbon dioxide and global warming has stopped... it's paused.

«A reduction in the rate of warming (not a pause) is a result of short - term natural variability, ocean absorption of heat from the atmosphere, volcanic eruptions, a downward phase of the 11 - year solar cycle, and other impacts over a short time period,» Cleugh says.

The second hypothesis is that ENSO is responsible for the slowdown since it magnified the warming over the first half of the pause and reduced it over the last half.

«The world is over 400 parts per million of carbon dioxide and global warming has stopped -LSB-...] it's paused,» Levant said.

And why is there so little reduction of the warming over land during the pause?

As for skeptics who concern themselves with the «pause in global warming», it is baffling to me how anybody would think a bit of cooling, warming or «pausing» over two or even ten decades can indicate very much at all.

The IPCC have gambled everything on the «pause» turning around and warming resuming over the next 5 years.

Tamino has just now shown that RATPAC balloon thermometer data of the lower troposphere does not support a «pause» in warming over the past 18 years as fake skeptics claim RSS data do.

Moreover, Zhou and Tung found no statistically - relevant evidence of either an acceleration or pause in global warming over the last 100 years.

And I assume the Sierra Club would issue a public retraction if confronted with the facts that the data are precisely as I described that over the last 18 years there has been no significant warming and indeed that is why global warming alarmists invented the term «the pause» to explain what they called the pause in global warming because the data demonstrate what you just said, that the Earth is cooking and warming, is not back up by the data.

The so - called and much debated «pause» in global warming is over.

Climate change: Fresh doubt over global warming «pause» Warming world harming insects» reproduction, says study [10/01/17] Image copyright SPL A warming world harms insects» ability to reproduce, which could have long - term consequences, scientistwarming «pause» Warming world harming insects» reproduction, says study [10/01/17] Image copyright SPL A warming world harms insects» ability to reproduce, which could have long - term consequences, scientistWarming world harming insects» reproduction, says study [10/01/17] Image copyright SPL A warming world harms insects» ability to reproduce, which could have long - term consequences, scientistwarming world harms insects» ability to reproduce, which could have long - term consequences, scientists warn.

While the AMO has not changed much in the past 10 years, the strong increase in North Atlantic temperatures between 1970 and 2000 may have contributed to the rapid rise in global temperatures over that period, and the leveling - out of the AMO may help make the observed pause in warming more likely.

The data and the statistical analysis does not provide the evidence that the so called «pause», a time period with a lower trend estimate than the longer - term trend estimate, was more than just a short - term fluctuation around the median warming trend, mostly due to short - term unforced internal variability in the Earth system (and some contribution from decreasing solar activity and increased reflecting aerosols in the atmosphere, counteracting the increased greenhose gas forcing to some degree), like the «acceleration» over the 16 - year period from 1992 to 2007 (e.g., UAH trend: 0.296 + / - 0.213 (2 sigma) deg.

Obviously, there is a logical contradiction here, if both conclusions, «global warming» and «pause» over the recent 20 years were equally valid, based on the same logic of reasoning and using the same data, only switching the Null - hypothesis with the alternative hypothesis, since the two conclusions are mutually exclusive.

This lapse of temperature data of the ocean's interior led to the scientific question over whether the world hit a «global warming pause» in the early 2000s, which fueled debates in congress over whether climate change is real.

A new research by NASA has revealed that extra heat from greenhouse gases were trapped in the Indian and Pacific oceans in recent years and this could likely be the cause of the so - called pause in global warming that was observed over the past decade.

A new NASA study offers an explanation to the so - called pause in global warming observed over the past few years.

Only one (Meehl) voluntarily mentioned the pause, calling it a «hiatus» during which «warming was not very large over last decade or so».

«I propose a robust definition for the length of the pause in the warming trend over the closing subsample of surface and lower tropospheric data sets.

Debate over whether the warming has really «paused» and the statistical significance of a trend over a short interval are basically debating points.

CO2 in the atmosphere has been slowly but steadily rising, yet the warming has been so minor over the past 20 years it looks like a plateau — which is what has sparked all the talk about a global warming pause or hiatus.