Sentences with phrase «warming peaks recorded»

Clearly something more in line with the duration of the rather obvious (3 warming peaks recorded) 60ish year cycle length would be «climate» and not 30 years.

Not exact matches

The researchers found that due to warm spring temperatures on Kodiak, the berries were developing fruit weeks earlier, at the same time as the peak of the salmon migration; 2014 was one of the warmest years on the island since record - keeping began 60 years ago.

The repeated bouts of warm weather this season have stunned polar researchers, and could push the Arctic to a record low winter peak for the third year in a row

The repeated bouts of warm weather this season have stunned even seasoned polar researchers, and could push the Arctic to a record low winter peak for the third year in a row.

A confounding factor in discussions of this period is the unfortunate tendency of some authors to label any warm peak prior to the 15th Century as the «Medieval Warm Period» in their recwarm peak prior to the 15th Century as the «Medieval Warm Period» in their recWarm Period» in their record.

In October, fueled in part by record - warm waters boosted by one of the strongest El Niños on record, the eastern Pacific's Hurricane Patricia became the strongest hurricane ever measured in the Western Hemisphere, with peak winds of 200 mph.

(see Part 1 of the Link) The way to go is simply to state clearly what the working hypothesis is and what are the reasonable assumptions that went into them — in my case the basic assumptions are that the current warming peak is a synchronous peak in the 60 and 960 year periodicities and that the 10Be and neutron count records are the best proxy for solar activity.

Japanese Naval Records indicate a fleet navigated a completely ice - free Arctic Ocean at the peak of the Medieval Warm Period, so total melting is nothing new, however unlikely at current temperatures.

However, global warming associated with the event normally lags several months behind that peak and as a result, 2016 could be even hotter that 2015, the warmest year on record.

Checking temperature records shows that June 1988 was indeed a warm peak, of the 1988 El Nino.

QUESTION: If this hypothetical +0.03 C per decade trend line for the seven hottest peak years on record between 1998 and 2028 stayed within the CMIP5 min - max boundary line, as shown on the above graphic, could climate scientists justifiably claim in the year 2028 that «global warming» a.k.a. «climate change» had occurred on schedule according to AR5's climate model predictions?

Although there is as yet no convincing evidence in the observed record of changes in tropical cyclone behaviour, a synthesis of the recent model results indicates that, for the future warmer climate, tropical cyclones will show increased peak wind speed and increased mean and peak precipitation intensities.

Anthropogenic warming in the post — war period was some 0.4 degrees K. 1944 and 1998 being the peaks of 2 successive 20 to 30 year warm Pacific Ocean regimes — as seen in both sea surface and surface temperature records.

Anthropogenic warming in the post — war period was some 0.4 degrees K — 1944 and 1998 being the peaks of 2 successive 20 to 30 year Pacific Ocean regimes — as seen in surface temperature records.

With 1998 either being the hottest or one of the hottest (dependent on which temperature record set one works with) years in recorded history, a constant refrain has been «there has been no warming since...» (or, for awhile, since 1998 was such a peak (aberration), «there has been cooling»).

[ISPM 2.1 d] This seems to suggest that 1998 was the peak year in all three data sets, whereas in fact 2005 was the warmest year in the instrumental record for both GISS and NCDC.

I realise the AMO will also have been affected by solar input, but given the AMO varies by 2C or so in the longer term, and the residual calculated by Hathaway et al is only 0.5 C or so from peak to trough, it would seem that after allowing for the solar effect on the AMO there wouldn't be much room for any co2 warming effect in the Armagh temperature record after the calcs were done.

Regardless of whether 2010 goes down in the record books as the wamest or 2nd warmest on instrument record, should we get a decent sized El Nino closer to the peak of solar max 24, new record high global temps should easily be set.

This makes 1934, not 1998, the warmest year on record and the 1930's the equivalent of the recent warm peak in the U.S..

The repeated bouts of warm weather this season have stunned even seasoned polar researchers, and could push the Arctic to a record low winter peak for the third year in a row.

That's why the world has remained far warmer than before — eight of the 10 hottest years on record have happened in the past decade — without quite reaching the same peak.

From a scientific point of view the exact execution and framing could be criticized on certain aspects (e.g. ECS is linearly extrapolated instead of logarithmically; the interpretation that recent record warmth are not peaks but rather a «correction to the trend line» depends strongly on the exact way the endpoints of the observed temperature are smoothed; the effect of non-CO2 greenhouse gases is excluded from the analysis and discussion), but the underlying point, that more warming is in store than we're currently seeing, is both valid and very important.

The way to go is simply to state clearly what the working hypothesis is and what reasonable assumptions went into them — in my case the basic assumptions are that the current warming peak is a synchronous peak in the 60 and 960 year periodicities and that the 10Be and neutron count records are the best proxy for solar activity.

California's record warmest year occurs at the peak of a sustained, long - term warming trend in the state over the past century or so — the same period over which the Earth's global mean temperature has risen by 1.5 ° F.

Based on the paleoclimate record from ice and ocean cores, the last warm period in the Arctic peaked about 8,000 years ago, during the so - called Holocene Thermal Maximum.

This presentation suggests that bias in the proxies and gaps in the records could have led to an underestimate of peak PETM warming.