Sentences with phrase «warming predictions»
"Warming predictions" refers to estimates or forecasts made by scientists about how much the Earth's temperature is expected to increase in the future due to climate change. Full definition
This is because it is almost impossible to get away with saying anything like «this could throw all of our global warming predictions out the window» in a scientific publication.
skepticalscience.com
But it was very clear that no one involved in climate research was at all enthusiastic about the CO2 warming predictions.
But if global - warming predictions bear out — with more prolonged droughts, more severe storms, more flooding — then figures of this magnitude will become standard.
A: When people wonder about the degree of certainty in global warming predictions versus next week's weather report, they are confusing climate and weather.
Apparently, there are admissions that the dire global warming predictions from the IPCC 2007 report of rising sea levels, more frequent and severe hurricanes and vanishing sea ice — all caused by human activity — are not happening.
The range of warming predictions for doubling carbon dioxide in the atmosphere - the so - called climate sensitivity - spans about 2 to 4.5 degrees C. according to the 2007 IPCC report.
Or maybe, «As shown in Figures 1.4 and 1.5, since the end of the 1992 Pinatubo volcano, models have predicted a steady upward trend in global average temperatures, but the observed series have been comparatively trendless, and thus the range of model warming predictions since the early 1990s can be seen to have been biased towards more warming than was subsequently observed.»
«For 27 Years NASA's Climate Model Warming Predictions Wrong - Odds Are 1 In 134 Million of Being This Wrong Main Maryland's Gov. «Incompetent» Blames «Global Warming» - The Anti-Science Democrat Ignores Empirical Evidence»
But one thing is certain: The fact it hasn't been factored into previous global warming predictions means forecasts even as recent as the 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are too conservative.
Some climate change deniers have taken encouragement from the pause, saying they show warming predictions are flawed, but Mann, a co-author on the study, notes that «there have been various explanations for why [the slowdown is happening], none of which involve climate models being fundamentally wrong.»
Kevin Hamilton, who co-authored the report, warns: «If our model results prove to be representative of the real global climate, then climate is actually more sensitive to perturbations by greenhouse gases than current global models predict, and even the highest warming predictions would underestimate the real change we could see.»
But the results I have been getting from the fully coupled ocean - atmosphere (CMIP) model runs that the IPCC depends upon for their global warming predictions do NOT show what Lindzen and Choi found in the AMIP model runs.
However, calling it by its proper name, carbon fertilization, would be like discussing global warming predictions while using the specific term CAGW rather than «climate change» and so admitting that global cooling is contradictory: not sufficiently dishonest.
One does not have to be a rocket scientist to recognize the global warming prediction quackery that constantly flows from the taxpayer - funded, government sanctioned, computer climate models.
«In this sense yes [1970s cooling predictions were similar to current warming predictions], our ignorance about the climate system is just enormous»
L&S don't even provide the emissions scenario for their future warming prediction - they simply assume that the linear man - made warming trend will continue without any justification.
According to RSS and UAH, 2010s are running slightly COOLER... and so I wish you lots of luck with your 0.16 °C warmer prediction 6 years from now.
My quote referred to the assertion that there was an increasing discrepancy between observed global temperatures and model simulated global temperature used for the global warming predictions presented in the IPCC report.
Thus, even the best global warming predictions represent a stripped - down version of the Earth's real climate, capable of approximating average conditions over entire countries a long time from now, but too crude to reliably forecast conditions within localized regions of the countries.
Amazingly, over the shorter term, the global warming predictions for the U.S. breadbasket have been even worse, in fact, astoundingly atrocious - instead of warming, growing areas have cooled considerably.
Yet Another Failed Global Warming Prediction of Extinction Main New Study: Hottest Temperatures For Arabian Sea Recorded During Roman & Medieval Periods»
Revelations is clearly very accurate, clearly agreeing with moden science computer models regarding global warming predictions, what will happen when a large asteroid strikes (note the word «when») and many other things unknown to science prior to the 21st Century.
Are there any web sites that provides the mathmatical model calculations for Global Warming predictions?
If Houlton's finding about these vast, previously unknown nitrogen stores holds true, then it would have an enormous impact on global warming predictions.
This stark reality stands in direct contrast to climate - alarmist predictions for this region; and it reveals that if there is any canary in the coal mine to be seen, it is in the failure of global warming predictions / theory to match real - world observations.
and secondly, because computer models base their future (and present) warming predictions on increasing greenhouse gases (and they «don't get the warming correct now»), that greenhouse gases actually are not causing the warming we have been seeing for the last 100 years.
OK - this is off topic and I know comments like this invoke just the hysteria I don't want to incite from skeptics, but are the weather patterns we are seeing in Iowa (intense precipitation) consistent with what one would expect from warming predictions?