Sentences with phrase «warming problem without»

Instead, the question is this: Why does this would - be champion of free markets believe that such a free market can address the global warming problem without any «price» associated with carbon that ultimately goes into the atmosphere?

Not exact matches

The larger the piece of butter you're working with, the warmer it can be without causing problems.

Intrigued by the idea that an organism without a brain could solve problems, I started warming to the idea of having slime mold in the house.

I love the fact that they aren't too warm, nor too cold, it is something that you can wear from Autumn to Spring without a problem.

By the way, if it idles without dying, you should let it idle until completely warmed up and see if the problem gets a little better.

The soft top is plenty warm enough for the coldest winters (I just went through one without issue) and its plenty quiet enough on the highway (I put on MANY highway miles thus far without a problem.

Do you still stick to your earlier assertion that decade without warming would be a problem for models?

Global warming and energy supply isn't really that big a problem if we just let a few billion people die off and the rest live without most of their modern conveniences.

Actually, there is some interesting work being done by Matt Huber of Purdue, following up on some earlier ideas of Emanuel's, suggesting that the role of TCs in transporting heat from equator towards the poles may be more significant than previously thought — it also allows for some interesting, though admittedly somewhat exotic, mechanisms for explaining the «cool tropics paradox» and «equable climate problem» of the early Paleogene and Cretaceous periods, i.e. the problem of how to make the higher latitudes warm without warming the tropics much, something that appears to have happened during some past warm epochs in Earth's history.

Global warming can not be solved without solving the population problem.

Because without the HS, the Mideval Warm period sticks out as a hughe problem.

It is not currently known just how warm the Medieval Warm Period was, but clearly the warmth then was below the tipping point because Earth's climate continued without probwarm the Medieval Warm Period was, but clearly the warmth then was below the tipping point because Earth's climate continued without probWarm Period was, but clearly the warmth then was below the tipping point because Earth's climate continued without problem.

In addition, if climate change is a moral problem, even assuming counter-factually that there is considerable scientific uncertainty about whether humans are causing serious global warming, those who are putting others at risk have duties to not endanger vulnerable people without their consent.

The reasonable guess - timate of warming to 2100 is somewhere under 1C, not much different from what we have seen over the past 150 years (without any problem, thank you).

Second problem, if there is a radiative forcing, it seems to me impossible than a cold atmosphere warm a warmer ground without any work (thermodynamics principles).

General Electric and the others know that the best wat to solve the problem of global warming, without public outcry, is to just be sooo nice and obedient.

(See, Brown, 2008) This is so because, from a proposition that a problem like global warming creates a particular threat or risk, one can not, however, deduce whether that threat is acceptable without first deciding on certain criteria for acceptability.

Though it is a problem, with or without global warming, that as the ice2sea project reveals today, has been over stated.

The problem is exactly as the First IPCC Assessment says — without understanding past warming we can't say what role GHG have.

Sea level rise is a problem that society would have to contend with, with our without global warming.

There is no solution to the problem of global warming without cutting emissions of greenhouse gases.

Atmospheric CO2 has been almost twenty times (20X) higher than now in the «historical record», without causing runaway global warming or any other problems.

In looking at the AGW problem, we should note that the kinds of problems we are identifying are actually just more of the same kinds of things we are expecting to have to deal with even without global warming.

Robert, the problem is without actual measurements, you can't show it was warming, we don't actually know what the temperatures are.

[20] The «Events» page of the Affordable Energy Summit's website goes on to state that the speakers at the National Clean Energy Summit, which took place just one day earlier, «believe that evidence of man - made global warming is enough to justify any action intended to solve the problem, without regard for effectiveness and without any regard for the expense.»

Now, on a matter of vital importance (global warming), I think we are seeing problems that occur when a person without a rigorous completed scientific background writes about science in such a way that he casts considerable doubt on the findings of a huge number of scientists and major scientific bodies.

Speaking in Anchorage, AK on Monday, Obama warned that without quick action to slow or reverse global warming, «entire nations will find themselves under severe, severe problems: More drought.

* that BP is funding research into «ways of tackling the world's climate problem» at Princeton University to the tune of $ 2 million per year for 15 years * that BP is funding an energy research institute involving two other US universities to the tune of $ 500 million — the aim of which is «to develop new sources of energy and reduce the impact of energy consumption on the environment» * that ExxonMobil itself has donated $ 100 million to Stanford university so that researchers there can find «ways to meet growing energy needs without worsening global warming»

«I offer a warm and safe environment in which you can discuss problems without judgment or blame.

I provide a warm, welcoming presence that allows you to work through your problems without judgment.»