This makes your global
warming propaganda like rather stupid, which is also the consensus of most atmospheric scientists.
Not exact matches
It's clear this is already happening and we can expect more op - eds in major newspapers from the
likes of George Will, more full - page adverts from industry - funded
propaganda mills masquerading as «conservative» think tanks, and more comments posted on every blog where global
warming is discussed, denouncing the «vast liberal hoax» of anthropogenic global
warming, because, you know, it's been proved that the earth isn't
warming, and if it is, it has nothing to do with fossil fuels.
The Great Global
Warming Swindle looks
like free, undisclosed
propaganda for coal and oil firms.
«I
like Carter's emphasis on the crucial difference between global
warming (which is part of normal scientific discourse) and «dangerous anthropogenic global
warming» (which is ideological
propaganda).
After the biggest and most expensive
propaganda campaign in human history, leading to the biggest tax increase in human history, trying to stop «global
warming» that isn't happening anyway and won't happen at anything
like the predicted rate is the least cost - effective use of taxpayers» money in human history, bar none — and that's saying something.
IMO, the point is to call out the facile nature of statements such as «global
warming has stopped,» rather than to argue how, if you squint just so in the exactly right kind of light, it might not look exactly
like propaganda.
Those who won't sign up to establishment
propaganda for profit of the climate Nastis are hounded out of their jobs by the greenshirts
like the Piltdown Mann Ortleiter, keen to defend his
warm period denying collage of disparate data sets, carefully modified and joined together to create an apparently contiguous but actually fabricated forgery.
But it should be emphasized that, although his points on the anti-intellectualism of creation science and lousy civics knowledge are sound, when he surrounds that with misdirection and literally unsupportable talking points about the global
warming issue, his message looks less
like one of genuine concern and more
like a subtle excuse to validate global
warming propaganda.
Surprisingly, since most programs
like this offer misanthropic global
warming propaganda (humans are evil carbon - spewers who are going to destroy the planet), the polar bear program was remarkably even - handed.
So, imply the «reposition global
warming» phrase is proof of skeptic climate scientists» guilt while failing to explain precisely how, and it only ends up looking
like slick
propaganda no matter which way you try to push it.