Sentences with phrase «warming reporting bias»

My own favorite target for quantifiable global warming reporting bias, the PBS NewsHour, echoed that exact spin when the program host offered no rebuttal about it, despite the fact that Trump — to informed ears — had not changed position in any way.

Not exact matches

Hot air It was «widely reported» that the UK broadcasting regulator had deemed Channel 4's The Great Global Warming Swindle «unfair, biased and totally misleading,» Lorne Gunter argues in the National Post, but in fact it ruled that the documentary did «not materially mislead» viewers.

At these high latitudes in the winter, where a significant wamring has been reported, the warm bias results in an overstatement of the warming.

Either way, he renders his reporting, on the matter of climate change and global warming, illegitimate; probably maintains his considered claim to legitimacy based on his uninformed perspective and his existing market base, with established bias.

So it is not surprising that his website only ever features those stations that confirm his beliefs (inbetween the reports of cold weather) and his «preliminary report» only features photos of stations that are (a) poorly - sited with a warming bias or (b) well - sited and show a cooling trend.

After following the global warming saga — science and policy — for nearly a quarter century, I've seen the biases at the journals and N.S.F. (including their press releases sometimes), in the I.P.C.C. summary process (the deep reports are mainly sloppy in some cases; the summary writing — read the climate - extinction section of this post — is where the spin lies), and sometimes in the statements and work of individual researchers (both skeptics and «believers»).

The station where a bias or shift is know to exist in the data record may still be used in estimation of missing reports at nearby high quality stations for non-critical points (i.e not a recent, warm or cold value.

Psychologists studying climate communication make two additional (and related) points about why the warming - snow link is going to be exceedingly difficult for much of the public to accept: 1) people's confirmation biases lead them to pay skewed attention to weather events, in such a way as to confirm their preexisting beliefs about climate change (see p. 4 of this report); 2) people have mental models of «global warming» that tend to rule out wintry impacts.

It is not credible to suggest the reports were biased in favour of the theory of anthropogenic global warming when the evidence demonstrates the IPCC were, in fact, so cautious.

Although the Watts, 2009 report speculated that the inadequate station siting of the U.S. Historical Climatology Network could have introduced a warming bias into the current U.S. temperature trends, it did not attempt to quantify what the net bias (if any) was.

He agrees that there was some global warming over the 20th century, although he suspects much of the reported global warming is due to urbanization bias.

Climate change skeptics claimed the IPCC 2007 report — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global wareport — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global waReport (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global warming.

For decades, the mainstream journalists have dutifully reported hysterical alarmism generated by a minority of scientists dedicated to the concept of human CO2 - caused catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)... this style of sensationalist, tabloid «climate science» journalism however is dependent on either a condition of stuck - on - stupid mentality or a highly biased, politically motivated political agenda, not on scientific empirical evidence

So I'm prompted to wonder... Since 1970, fewer, larger ships reporting SST from fixed (intake / hull) sensors — could this intruduce a warming bias in the recent observed SST data?

They report along the lines of that there seems to be a warming bias in the observations according to their models and therfore the observations have been adjusted to fit the models.

It's an otherwise quite good US news exposé public broadcasting series that has inexplicably biased reports about the global warming issue.

Initially, their report stated that «There has been a severe bias towards removing higher - altitude, higher - latitude, and rural stations, leading to a further serious overstatement of warming.»

The surface temperature data is a contaminated mess with a significant warm bias, and as I have detailed elsewhere the IPCC fabricated evidence in its 2007 report to cover up the problem.

One thing which confuses me is BEST has acknowledged its uncertainty levels are both too small and somewhat biased on the temporal dimension, yet it still published a report discussing the «warmest year» claims based upon its uncertainty levels.

OT I would like commenters» views on this: «The UN body that advises world leaders on climate change must investigate an apparent bias in its report that resulted in several exaggerations of the impact of global warming, according to its former chairman.

Sunday Express in UK reporting on frontpage that BBC Pension Fund is invested heavily in carbon trading companies leading to bias in news coverage in world's biggest news organisation promoting belief in global warming.

The IPCC reports that since 1900, the world's surface has warmed about 0.6 C, a figure most folks will accept (with some provisos I'll get to in a minute about temperature measurement biases).

We evaluated the association between dismissing attachment and positive bias in school - aged children's reports of their own emotional experience and their parental care, hypothesizing that: (1) compared to secure children, dismissing children would underreport their subjective distress relative to physiological indicators of distress, and (2) dismissing children would report that their parents were warmer / more caring than would secure children.