Sentences with phrase «warming research because»

Not exact matches

Sweltering summertime heat waves are on the rise across the Northern Hemisphere because of atmospheric changes brought on by Arctic warming, new research shows.

The finding surprised the University of Arizona - led research team, because the sparse instrumental records for sea surface temperature for that part of the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean did not show warming.

Not to worry though, because what chance is there that our scientific study results could even be related to foreign relations, other than, you know, research on global warming or acid rain or fish populations or avian - flu transmission or mad - cow - disease transmission, or ozone depletion or....

«These areas are most susceptible to climate warming in the coming century in Antarctica, because they are the closest to the melt threshold,» says climatologist Andrew Monaghan of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., who was not involved in this study but reviewed the rResearch in Boulder, Colo., who was not involved in this study but reviewed the researchresearch.

However, emerging research suggests that Joshua trees are disappearing across much of the Mojave Desert, perhaps because of ongoing global warming.

Scientific research suggests that global warming causes heavier rainfall because a hotter atmosphere can hold more moisture and warmer oceans evaporate faster feeding the atmosphere with more moisture.

Professor Kug notes that further research is needed to obtain a general conclusion on the matter, but this research delivers important implications for climate adaptation because the analysis shows that if current warming trends continue, it is feasible to conclude that the ecosystems in regions affected by the anomalous climate will suffer greater damages due to the cold and dry spells.

The research is of great interest on the international stage because present - day global warming is strongly tied to a shrinking ice cover in the Arctic Ocean.

Lindzen was allowed to print his «Iris Theory» (stating that global warming might end because of a natural increase in cooling - type clouds and less water vapor - a heat - trapping greenhouse gas) in Geophysical Research Letters (Jun. 26, 2001 - a legitimate peer - reviewed journal).

I say «may» because research that tries to take gaps in measurement into account (particularly in the fast warming Arctic) or that takes into account temporary phenonomena (like volcanoes, solar variability, etc) show that there has barely been any slowdown in this one aspect of climate change.

Research so far suggest that because of a warming, moistening atmosphere, CAPE will like increase as temperatures continue to rise.

Research from the same group also suggests that landfalling typhoons are intensifying more than those that stay out at sea, likely because of warmer coastal waters that help them ramp up in strength.

«This result is exciting because it shows that a common trait of most of the atmospheres in our solar system — a warm stratosphere — also can be found in exoplanet atmospheres,» study co-author Mark Marley, of NASA's Ames Research Center in California's Silicon Valley, said in a statement.

Because everyone in this global community will be affected by climate change, it will be for our own benefit if we manage to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in such a way that global warming is limited to less than 2 degrees Celsius», says Prof. Ulf Riebesell, marine biologist at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and coordinator of BIOACID.

Unfortunately, new research suggests melting may occur faster than we thought as the Earth warms, because of how Greenland's glaciers are anchored to bedrock.

I've heard about mangos doing the same thing but I would be reluctant to say don't eat mangos or goji berries due to their «warming» effect because I have not seen any research to confirm this.

That's good, because you're going to be eating a lot more of them, according to new research that finds vegetarian and vegan diets to be the most sustainable long - term option for the world's growing population on a warming planet.

And that's a good thing because market research presently suggests contemporary consumers do not like to think about winter during the summer months, so they put off buying warm outerwear until they really need it.

Britain's Met Office has updated the temperature data set it maintains with the University of East Anglia and finds that the last decade experienced more warming that this research effort had previously measured, in large part because of added data from the Arctic.

Scientists can't prove that global warming is the cause, because that would take decades of data and research.

Updated, Nov. 10, 2015, 3:04 p.m. A new study in Nature Climate Change, «Revaluating ocean warming impacts on global phytoplankton,» has shown that the method used to calculate phytoplankton loss in the 2010 research greatly overstated plankton losses because of a missing vital factor.

The piece caught my eye because, in sifting through New York Times archives a few years ago while researching my book on the changing Arctic, I found what I believe is our first substantial newspaper coverage of research pointing to the prospect that humans could substantially warm the climate — a 1956 article on Plass's work by Waldemar Kaempffert.

The research is important because the lead author is Kerry Emanuel, the M.I.T. climate scientist who in the 1980's foresaw a rise in hurricane intensity in a human - warmed world and in 2005, just a few weeks before Hurricane Katrina swamped New Orleans, asserted in a Nature paper that he had found statistical evidence linking rising hurricane energy and warming.

This latest research is significant, because it involves the use of 19 advanced computer climate models, ones that have had the effect of these warming tongues of the oceans, built in.

Recall that the catastrophe community has longed blamed CO2 for recent warming, because their research and models found no other causes for the «unprecedented» warming in the past 25 years or so.

This is because, in this region, wind power depends on the temperature difference between the land and the sea, and previous research has shown that warming occurs faster on land than above oceans.

I'll give an example because a) I want to show the traditional use of «heat and light» and some other points I've made but b) this page too has slipped in a fake fisics meme, much as a lot of papers do giving real research results which then slip in something about «global warming» or carbon dioxide» to justify their grant..

One of the reasons Bangladesh is suffering is because money that could be going to solve their real problems is being diverted to «global warming / climate change / climate disruption» research and policies.

The research is important because it's intended to influence the direction of UN negotiations involving more than 190 countries on how to combat global warming.

Of course it is worth knowing that 97 % of research papers and / or their authors attribute global warming to humans but as the video says, it's the science behind it that counts, and just because the papers are peer reviewed in itself proves nothing about whether the scientific proposal / theory is necessarily right.

• $ 365,000 to Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (FREE) which advocates against taking action on climate change because warming is «inevitable» and expensive to address.

He was posing, I said, as a skeptical scientist; his results would broadly confirm the pre-existing temperature series; when his research ended, he would declare himself to have been converted from scepticism to the belief that merely because the world had warmed the warming must be our fault; and publication of his results would be exploited as a triumphant and final confirmation of the «global warming» orthodoxy.

If Cook et al. are now saying that many papers do not make a definite statement because it is obvious that most of global warming is human - made, I am inclined to agree with this assumption, not least because of other research referenced on this page showing a similar degree of consensus.

I propose a sociological proposition: there are many retired scientists who are skeptical about global warming theory because they no longer have a vested interest in the outcome of any research.

This is an important point, because Christy is constantly claiming that his UAH satellite temperature record is the gold standard, contrary to other research, for example Mears et al. 2011 and Thorne et al. 2011, which note that the satellite data possibly have outstanding issues, and contrary to the Watts and Christy preliminary paper in which the amount of warming the authors claim is happening in the United States is inconsistent with the amount of warming in the UAH record.

The scientists chose the period of time known as the «Holocene» for their research, because it is the most recent natural warm phase in Earth's history.

Retired professor John Brignell's website presents hundreds of absurd research claims, from the Alps melting and Amazon being destroyed to the «world going up in flames» over resource scarcity and zebra mussels taking over the Thames River — all because of global warming.

- London Telegraph: The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame Global warming has finally been explained: the Earth is getting hotter because the Sun is burning more brightly than at any time during the past 1,000 years, according to new research.

The ice sheet is the focus of scientific research because its fate has huge implications for global sea levels, which are already rising as ice sheets melt and the ocean warms, exposing coastal locations to greater damage from storm surge - related flooding.

But Muller's study made waves in the media because he had been a prominent climate - change skeptic, partly funded by a foundation linked to global - warming deniers, and his research focused on skeptics» objections to previous studies of warming.

I think the actual warming is 30 % to40 % less than the 0.8 C claimed by the climate research «team» because they have fudged the data and adjusted for UHI effects improperly.

Because it affects our ability to find the Holy Grail of climate research: cloud feedback... Sufficiently positive cloud feedback could cause a global warming Armageddon.

Research which heaped doubt on the rate of global warming was deliberately suppressed by scientists because it was «less than helpful» to their cause, it was claimed last night.

Other Republican candidates should gleefully (and aggressively) point out that Huntsman is indeed «crazy» because he refuses to accept the latest climate research and empirical evidence that proves natural forces are the primary forces driving warming and climate change, not the trace gas CO2.

Basically, Dr Ferenc Miskolczi's life as a NASA climate research scientist was made hell because he discovered that the extra water vapour being evaporated is not having a positive - feedback (increasing the CO2 warming effect by absorbing more infrared from the sun), instead it is going into increased cloud cover, which reflects incoming sunlight back to space.

The only reason an entire research community was entrained this time is because the scientific issue (global warming) is that big.

The research is of great interest because present - day global warming is strongly tied to a shrinking ice cover in the Arctic Ocean.

Global Warming is a serious issue to Antarctica because it melts the ice and then scientists won't be able to research on Antarctica.

He told me that of course he receives private funding for his research: he has to because it's his only way of making ends meet, especially since the Alarmist establishment launched its vendetta against him when, from 2009 onwards, he became more outspoken in his critiques of global warming theory.

Gallup's research discovered that about half the public associates warmer weather with global warming (the other half sees it as normal variation); fewer associate snow and cold weather with global warming because «the connection [is] less intuitive.»