Sentences with phrase «warming research considered»

America was built around a healthy skepticism of government, so why is government funded global warming research considered exempt by the American press?

Not exact matches

Here's a better idea for this so - called «governor» to consider: Take a look at the research done by your alma mater, Texas A&M, on global warming and the effect it will have on Texas (higher temps and greater stress on water through decreased rainfall and increased evaporation)... then stop poopooing the efforts to mitigate the effect humans are having on climate change.

Their research, published in Nature Climate Change on June 29, is the first attempt to examine and document these changes in the air - sea heat exchange in the region — brought about by global warming — and to consider its possible impact on oceanic circulation, including the climatologically important Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation.

Moreover, their results were nonsynchronous: «Their analysis doesn't consider whether the warm / cold periods occurred at the same time,» says Peter Stott, a climate scientist at the U.K.'s Hadley Center for Climate Prediction and Research in Bracknell.

Research on dinosaurs considers such questions as how they moved and whether they were warm or cold - blooded.

The distinct behaviour observed when VFX contamination, acidification and warming acted alone or in combination highlighted the need to consider the likely interactive effects of seawater warming and acidification in future research regarding the toxicological aspects of chemical contaminants.

I had never seriously considered New Orleans as a must - visit location, but I've warmed up to The Big Easy after doing some trip research this week.

A majority of Americans do not consider the climate crisis to be particularly important: According to a poll carried out in January by the Pew Research Center, only 30 percent of Americans rated global warming as a top priority for President Obama.

When considered alongside research on past shifts in Arctic flora and fauna, a picture emerges of a physical system that amplifies warm or cool jogs and a biological system attuned to such changes.

Global Warming The experts considered four solutions in this area: investing only in mitigation of greenhouse - gas emissions; investing in mitigation and research and development into low ‐ carbon energy technology; investing only in research and development into low ‐ carbon energy technology; investing in a combination of mitigation, research and development and adaptation.

Some 98 percent of working climate scientists agree that the atmosphere is already warming in response to human greenhouse - gas emissions, and the most recent research suggests that we are on a path toward what were once considered «worst case» scenarios.

The university was quick to acknowledge both studies in a press release, note small differences in approaches and include quotes from the authors, who reiterated that global warming is quite real, more research is needed, and reducing emissions of CO2 should be considered a top priority.

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley About 18 months ago, as soon as I heard of Dr. Richard Müller's Berkeley Earth Temperature project, I sent an email to several skeptical scientists drawing their attention to his statement that he considered his team's attempt to verify how much «global warming» had occurred since 1750 to be one of the most important pieces of research ever to be conducted in the history of science.

According to research by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), based at the University of Colorado at Boulder, the decline in summer Arctic sea ice «is considered a strong signal of long - term climate warming».

This book of research challenges readers to consider the costs and benefits of different responses to global warming.

Warming over 2 degrees celsius would have dramatic consequences: the planet's ice sheets would be far more likely to melt, triggering more sea level rise, than at 1.5 degrees, which is considered the safer limit, according to Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, a physicist who heads the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.

The current global warming industry generates billions of dollars annually for research, which helps to explain why 36 percent consider climate scientists» research findings as being influenced by a desire to «advance their careers.»

The experts say their research DOES NOT UNDERMINE THE SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS THAT EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GASES FROM HUMAN ACTIVITY DRIVE GLOBAL WARMING, BUT THEY CALL FOR A CLOSER EXAMINATION OF THE WAY CLIMATE COMPUTER MODELS CONSIDER WATER VAPOUR.

Deadlines for considering research in the IPCC reports — a six - month limit — renders them out of date before they are published, noted David Victor of the University of California, San Diego, and the author of Global Warming Gridlock.

The report quoted David Viner, senior research scientist at the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, long considered an authoritative resource for global warming research, as saying snow would soon be «a very rare and exciting event» in research scientist at the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, long considered an authoritative resource for global warming research, as saying snow would soon be «a very rare and exciting event» in Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, long considered an authoritative resource for global warming research, as saying snow would soon be «a very rare and exciting event» in research, as saying snow would soon be «a very rare and exciting event» in Britain.

When considering this type of literature one must not forget the immense financial clout of the global warming movement that spends more than three billion dollars in the US alone on climate research, lobbying, and propaganda.

The fresh research has provided estimates that if only carbon dioxide emissions are considered then the total carbon dioxide budget that would keep warming below two degrees would be around 5000 gigatonnes.

Together, the independent variables explained 37 % of the variation in certainty that global warming is occurring, and 29 % of the variation in views on global warming harm, which is considered a moderate amount of explained variance in social science research (Cohe 342 n, 1992).

Moreover, their results were nonsynchronous: «Their analysis doesn't consider whether the warm / cold periods occurred at the same time,» says Peter Stott, a climate scientist at the U.K.'s Hadley Center for Climate Prediction and Research in Bracknell.

However, considered as an ensemble of individual expert opinions, the assemblage of local representations of climate establishes both the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period as climatic anomalies with worldwide imprints, extending earlier results by Bryson et al. (1963), Lamb (1965), and numerous intervening research efforts.

The film used research by McIntyre and McKitrick to support the argument for a strong «medieval warm period,» despite the fact that M&M's critique focused on the 15th century, a time period generally considered part of the Little Ice Age.

While several years have passed since global warming was considered the most pressing issue facing mankind, recent studies from the Center for Atmospheric Research, the National Academy of Sciences, NASA, the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, and basically any scientific report available on the issue confirmed that it is not only still happening, but might also be worth stopping.

Robert Howarth, an environmental biology professor at Cornell University, used research from the United Nations to calculate that if methane's potency were considered over 20 years rather than 100 years, it would be 72 times as powerful as carbon dioxide in terms of its warming potential.