Sentences with phrase «warming scare as»

Few have been so brilliantly effective at debunking the global warming scare as this compellingly articulate British Lord.

Most of them are scarred veterans of the decades - long battle to expose the man - made global warming scare as what another speaker, Tony Heller, describes as «the biggest scientific deception in history.»

Not exact matches

«I remember being scared witless as an 11 - year - old by a fire - and - brimstone history teacher who told us we would all be dead by Christmas because the Soviet Union urgently needed access to warm water ports for some reason, and the Red Army was going to sweep through Europe,» he wrote.

I remember being scared witless as an 11 year old by a fire - and - brimstone history teacher who told us we would all be dead by Christmas because the Soviet Union urgently needed access to warm water ports for some reason, and the Red Army was going to sweep through Europe.

I'm not going to lie, the last time I was here in December the heat was so intense I was a little bit scared to come back, but thankfully, as soon as I got out of the airport I was welcomed with warm and breezy weather.

You will start to see a lot of soft colors like blush also known as «bubblegum pink» now that the weather is warming up so don't be scared to try them.

This Week: Kevin gets out the crazy clown make - up and plans to scare oodles of children this weekend as he warms up to the Halloween festivities.

But the scare over pythons on the Everglades brought some new twists to the old tale; federal officials warned that, given global warming, the pythons could spread as far as San Francisco within 50 years.

Salon Zürcher, too, serves as a warm - up exercise for those scared by the sheer volume of fairs to come.

But instead, we have broken narratives scattered throughout the wasteland of 24 - hour news cycles that only come back to global warming as a point of debate or a method of scare tactics.

Those who do have some understanding know that the solutions will be fought as strenuously by various elements of the environmental movement that is trying to scare them about global warming.

Now, I'm not sure what the Times» shift in thinking is with the article — and after more than a decade of consistent gloom - and - doom reporting and editorializing on global warming, I would imagine that the Green - leaning newspaper does not intend to rethink its position on the scare — but it's going to take more than the mere economic exploitation of a shrinking polar ice cap to establish human activity as the cause of the melting.

Such policies would encourage economic growth as the foundation for a cleaner environment, responsible development and use of fossil fuels until superior energy sources are found, and repeal of many of the regulations, subsidies, and taxes passed at the height of the man - made global warming scare.

The whole point of the global warming scare is to take an uncertain and unproven scientific hypothesis and insist on it as an absolute scientific certainty requiring immediate action — which just so happens to be a very specific agenda that aligns perfectly with a certain political outlook.

From the Department of amalgamated dumbasses who own mansions, comes this trailer via Newsbuster's Noel Sheppard: Showtime announced last year that it had commissioned Oscar - winning filmmaker James Cameron to produce an eight - part series for the network designed to scare the public into thinking the world is doomed as a result of global warming.

Before too long the global warming scare will be as dead as the scares about the Y2 bug or acid rain.

Financial Times took note of Climate Depot, citing Morano in March 2010: «No one believes the warming scientists as they have overreached themselves... It became a silly game where they were trying to scare people» — Mar. 9, 2010

The third example shows how a list published by the Heartland Institute (which has been sponsored by Exxon) of 500 scientists «whose research contradicts man - made global warming scares» (6) turns out to be nothing of the kind: as soon as these scientists found out what the institute was saying about them, many angrily demanded that their names be removed.

But, as Watts Up With That reports new evidence unearthed by an inquisitive graduate student suggests that «ocean acidification» may be a scientific fraud to rank with the great «man - made - global warming» scare.

Bart is pointing out that those promoting the AGW - scare are using a false excuse for the cessation of global warming and, therefore, their claims — which I list as (a) and (b)-- are wrong.

That amount of warming would be disastrous and means we should remain scared about the future in the way I wrote about in my book Requiem for a Species, which led some to see me as a «Dr Doom» figure.

(Revised September 23, 2016 by addition of a new final section by Dr. James Wallace) As discussed in my book, Environmentalism Gone Mad, two of the reasonable inferences from the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) hypothesis (the scientific basis for the world climate scare pushed by the United Nations and the Obama Administration) are that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels should affect global temperatures, and that the resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the tropics.

99.9 %??? The vast majority of scientists look at the above chart and instantly know that the Antarctica warming scare pushed by Comiso is a fabrication - like much of the IPCC «science» the public and policymakers are now identifying as a fabrication.

Which animal was used as a mascot for both the «global cooling» scare in the 1970s and the «global warming» scare of today!?

They constantly repeat as a scratched record:» climate sensitivity — climate sensitivity» — but are scared to acknowledge; the sensitivity of oxygen & nitrogen in expanding / shrinking in change of temperature + the speeding of» vertical winds» when gets warmer close to the ground - and what's the temp up there, where they expand when warmed extra.

According to Ridley and Peiser, world temperatures had gone up «less than half as fast as the scientific consensus predicted in 1990 when the global - warming scare began in earnest» and «the planet was significantly warmer than today several times during the past 10,000 years.»

I mean if, as Nurse is now suggesting, the scientific mainstream understanding of global warming is that it's happening but that it's open to debate how significant it is then doesn't this completely contradict pretty much everything he, the Royal Society, and its two previous presidents Lords Rees and May have been doing this last decade or more to stoke up the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare for all they'rewarming is that it's happening but that it's open to debate how significant it is then doesn't this completely contradict pretty much everything he, the Royal Society, and its two previous presidents Lords Rees and May have been doing this last decade or more to stoke up the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare for all they'reWarming scare for all they're worth?

As pointed out by Tom Nelson, it should be increasingly obvious to everyone what some of us have been saying for years — the global warming scare is not driven by science, but is a vehicle for pushing a broad range of socialist / progressive issues.

The premise for this scare story is that Greenland's glaciers or the Western Antarctic ice sheet will melt, but neither of these melted when temperatures were as high as, or higher than today, during the Medieval Warm period 1,000 years ago, or the Roman Warm period 1,000 years earlier.

Thus the 1970's predictions could not have been built on the satellite data as the global warming scare predates a suitable satellite record, the «present» scare being portrayed as continuing from the 1970's predictions.

That was one of the reasons the «ocean acidification» scare was invented: as a fallback position in case it were to become clear — as it increasingly has — that anthropogenic global warming theory is a busted flush.

«When future generations look back on the global - warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records — on which the entire panic ultimately rested — were systematically «adjusted» to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.»

«As many now also recognise — however fiercely it is denied — the late 20th century rise in temperatures, which set off the warming scare in the first place, has simply not continued.

Most will assume as true the fourth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scare story that human - induced global warming is a certainty and poses catastrophic consequences -LSB-...]

Booker wrote an article in The Telegraph where he describes global warming as «the greatest and costliest scare story the world has ever known.»

Booker writes future generations will «look back on the global - warming scare of the past 30 years» and «nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records -LSB-...] were systematically «adjusted» to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.»

According to Peiser and Ridley, world temperatures have gone up «less than half as fast as the scientific consensus predicted in 1990 when the global - warming scare began in earnest.»

Jeff Dunetz... The real reason Al Gore wants you to read his books and go see his movies and even see his lectures isn't because he is trying to save the Earth from global warming and climate change, but because he's invested in products that will be successful as long as people are convinced by the climate change scare tactics.

Referring to C02 as a «pollutant» or «poisoning the atmosphere» with C02 is patently ridiculous; but unfortunately such statements are common in our culture of global - warming scare - mongering.

-LSB-...] In 1987, the scare abruptly changed to «global warming», and the IPCC (the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) was established (1988), issuing its first assessment report in 1990, which served as the basis of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC).

It is the temperature downslide I fear as a unconvinced scientist of this «Global Warming» scare.

«As to the global warming issue, the argument is so full of hype and scare tactics that I for one have decided that it is a political argument and not a scientific argument at all.

Stossel has previously claimed that global warming is «another foolish media - hyped scare,» as Media Matters documented.

1) Forums user ArcheoTerra has a beef with using global warming as a scare tactic / behavior - changer: «Please don't get me wrong, I think efforts made to «save» the earth are

Then in 1992, as the global warming scare was growing, more under - ice runs were obtained.

Unfortunately, he was vilified on the grounds that he had receved financial support from Philip Morris — just as scientists who question the global warming scare are vilified if they have received much - needed funding from the fossil fuel industry — as you have described so eloquently elsewhere on your blog.

Now if the warmists would use this map projection (Bonne, I think) we'd be a lot less scared of global warming as those big red blobs become tiny red blobs.