Sentences with phrase «warming scare with»

Not exact matches

Made with dates and tamarind paste, along with tomatoes, onions, cherry peppers, garlic, and white vinegar, Basbaas's version is slightly sweet and smoky, with a gentle, warming heat that shouldn't scare off the spice - averse.

A lot of the times, I will use a clear spot treatment and I'll leave it on under makeup that I apply... Most people should not be popping their own pimples because it can cause scaring, but if a pimple is ready to release, it will do so on its own with a warm compress and exfoliation.

I'm not going to lie, the last time I was here in December the heat was so intense I was a little bit scared to come back, but thankfully, as soon as I got out of the airport I was welcomed with warm and breezy weather.

This bodycon dress scared me at first because I thought it would be a little too tight if you know what I'm saying... but it actually just holds me in perfectly AND is long sleeved with a little mock neck, so it's even warm in the chilly temps.

Wan imbues Insidious with a clean look, washed out of many warm colors and employing stylishly stark contrasts, though that doesn't necessarily add up to many scares.

The fear that civilization could collapse in some kind of armageddon has increased in the last 15 years, be it with September 2001, global warming, avian flu scares, and more recently Ebola.

A good soak in warm water with a little bit of soap or Dawn dishwashing detergent scares the fleas away.

If you're scared to stay at other people's place, a good idea is to just meet up with them over food / drinks / whatever activity you have in mind or travel with them even just for a day to warm you up to the idea of CSing.

The conclusion Dyson points to of just letting global warming chug along for now only makes sense if we are, collectively, willing to take risks that really scare me with the only place we have to live on.

If the world's foremost climate scientists didn't know whether man's activities were warming or cooling the planet, how could any responsible government condone scaring its people with «descriptions of climate - related health risks»?

Skeptics have long cited Doran's research to show that global warming is a flawed theory motivated by alarmist scientists more interested in scaring up huge research grants than in pursuing the evidence with honesty and integrity.

Crichton stirred the climate debate with a 2004 novel, State of Fear, in which the bad guys were radical environmentalists trying to scare the world about global warming in order to line their pockets.

A similar occurrence of decreasing global temperatures with rapidly increasing CO2 emissions took place during the 33 years from 1942 to 1975 (the 70's global cooling scare) so the stated correlation of increased CO2 emissions with global warming never actually existed.

Basically, they are shit - scared that this «CO2 fertilization» effect (mentioned with scarcely concealed fear and loathing in the IPCC Group 1 2007 report — not that you sceptical lot would have noticed) is the «smoking gun» of the last decade which has started delivering a flat lining in warming and more recently even cooling.

So, with the global warming scare behind us, we can return to worrying about and trying to solve real problems, right?

To «SpencerTracy» I see you are STILL attempting to scare everybody with this global warming FRAUD.

Now, I'm not sure what the Times» shift in thinking is with the article — and after more than a decade of consistent gloom - and - doom reporting and editorializing on global warming, I would imagine that the Green - leaning newspaper does not intend to rethink its position on the scare — but it's going to take more than the mere economic exploitation of a shrinking polar ice cap to establish human activity as the cause of the melting.

I refer, with apologies to Churchill, to the ridiculous competition among our politicians to scare us silly about global warming.»

Anyone with a conscience has stopped defending by now the use of the global warming hoax and scare tactic to raise taxes on the productive to fund the Left's liberal Utopia.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228392.300-hyperwarming-climate-could-turn-earths-poles-green.html?full=true This is a funny read if you consider that they are using past warmings to try to scare people into thinking that we could induce one of these hyper warmings with CO2.

The whole point of the global warming scare is to take an uncertain and unproven scientific hypothesis and insist on it as an absolute scientific certainty requiring immediate action — which just so happens to be a very specific agenda that aligns perfectly with a certain political outlook.

I do think though that the powerful have promoted this warming with scare tactics for their own gain.

But, as Watts Up With That reports new evidence unearthed by an inquisitive graduate student suggests that «ocean acidification» may be a scientific fraud to rank with the great «man - made - global warming» scWith That reports new evidence unearthed by an inquisitive graduate student suggests that «ocean acidification» may be a scientific fraud to rank with the great «man - made - global warming» scwith the great «man - made - global warming» scare.

You go and read the few posts on my homepage; all the proofs are there, CO2 has nothing to do with climate / climatic changes have nothing to do with the phony GLOBAL warmings — all proven, beyond any reasonable doubt Montalbano YOU ARE A COWARD, SCARED TO FACE REAL PROOFS

It is clear that the global warming scare is highly politicised with the motives of the UN / IPCC unashamedlty and publicly being being global social / economic change rather than anything to do with the climate, the most recent being the following: http://www.unric.org/en/latest-un-buzz/29623-figueres-first-time-the-world-economy-is-transformed-intentionally

The two solar cycles from 1976 to 1996 had a stronger solar magnetic field with more GCR deflection leading to 3 % less average cosmic ray flux, fewer shading clouds, and the global warming scare.

Mixed in with the lectures on Global Warming are formulations of Crichton's more general environmental philosophy — that a new politico - legal - media complex has taken over control from the military industrial complex, and is dedicated to controlling the population by promoting a state of fear about false environmental scares like catastrophic Global Warming.

Dozens of scientists are demanding that their names be removed from a widely distributed Heartland Institute article entitled 500 Scientists with Documented Doubts of Man - Made Global Warming Scares.

Earlier today we broke the story about dozens of scientists outraged at the use of their good names in an article by Heartland Institute's «Senior Fellow» Dennis Avery (inset) posted on their website entitled 500 Scientists with Documented Doubts of Man - Made Global Warming Scares.

This is what happens when you send people from liberal Brown University, who conveniently come up with another scare - a-rama about global warming, in what appears to be another feeble «alarmist» attempt to counter climategate and all the other «gates» since.

WARMING alarmists rebut the 1970's global cooling scare with claims that the phenomenon wasn't «peer - reviewed» or that a «consensus» of «97 %» of «scientists» didn't agree.

This provided the maximum possible warming rate rate with which to scare the masses.

With someone like Dyer commenting on global warming and the closely - related biodiversity scare (see my biodiversity take here) it seems unlikely that SunTV will be delivering anything remotely connected to the sentiments expressed in this paragraph from the front page of its website:

In yet another recent National Post article «environmentalist» and oil - sands apologist Lawrence Solomon opens with: «The great global warming scare is over.»

Forty years ago during the global cooling scare, scientists were studying this collapse which had been going on for 6,000 years, and saying: «It has nothing to do with a warmer climate, just the dynamics of unstable ice.»

Global warming beater Justin Gillis of the New York Times had an article yesterday describing a new paper in the current issue of Nature magazine, the point of which seems to be scaring people with alarming global warming statistics.

Referring to C02 as a «pollutant» or «poisoning the atmosphere» with C02 is patently ridiculous; but unfortunately such statements are common in our culture of global - warming scare - mongering.

I am looking at what has happened in the last ten years with respect to the central assumptions of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) scare, about which I wrote a decade ago.

I think the leaders don't want to scare Russians with the truth about global warming because they don't have good solutions.

1) Forums user ArcheoTerra has a beef with using global warming as a scare tactic / behavior - changer: «Please don't get me wrong, I think efforts made to «save» the earth are

Trying to scare people with «projections» of 4 degrees C, over 7 degrees F, of warming this century?!?!?

lolwot, in the past was: if you don't give 10 % to the church, St. Peter will get angry and will sent hailstorms and create floods; after Darwin published his book — the shonky scientists started with GLOBAL warmings and ice ages to scare the people — only now because of electronic media and communication technology — they are more loud — but the scare tactic doesn't work; because people are not buying the new socialist religion of worshiping the CO2: http://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/q-a/

Barely has the year begun and already the climate alarmist propaganda machine is up to its old tricks, trying to scare you with made up science stories promising global warming - related doom and gloom...

For the respondents that would contemplate purchasing a haunted home, the following spooky occurrences would stop them from buying a home: • 75 percent would be scared off by levitating objects from purchasing a home; • 63 percent would be deterred by objects being moved from where they were placed; • 63 percent would be dissuaded by ghost sightings; • 61 percent would be discouraged by supernatural sensations; • 61 percent would be scared off by flickering lights / appliances; • 60 percent would pass on a home with strange noises (footsteps, doors slamming); • 34 percent would be deterred by warm or cold spots.