Because of the complexity of global
warming science as well as the challenge of securing accurate estimations of emissions from these various sectors, this estimation is the best we can hope for.
It confirms it backs the Heartland Institute, for example, which describes global
warming science as a «fraud.»
This is likely to come up in global
warming science as well.
Not exact matches
Environmentalists have long scrutinized Exxon Mobil for giving money «to dozens of right - leaning interest groups whose main purpose was to cast doubt on that very
science» despite understanding the link between global
warming and the burning of fossil fuels
as early
as the 1970s, according to the New York Times.
Kyoto will be ineffective — even assuming the overstated pro-Kyoto
science is correct, Kyoto will reduce projected
warming insignificantly, and it would take
as many
as 40 such treaties to stop alleged global
warming.
In a CNBC interview last Thursday, Pruitt rejected established
science pointing to carbon dioxide
as the main driver of recent global
warming.
The irony continues with the feting of Okotoks
as the greenest community in Canada by such pundits
as Prime Minister Stephen Harper and CBC's Peter Mansbridge at the same time the «rurban» community sits in the chosen provincial riding of Wildrose leader Danielle Smith — a right wing student of the climate - change - denying Fraser Institute and cheerful avower that global
warming science is «not settled.»
And to all the people who think that
science is cold and heartless with no soul or hope
as opposed to religion which is
warm and fuzzy and gives people hope: how many lives does
science save every single day
as opposed to religion; clothe people; keep them
warm; let them communicate better; let them eat better and live in better safety than what religion could ever, or has ever, provided?
Just
as every Easter long - falsified stories about Jesus are
warmed up by journalists to increase the print - run of their magazines, so similar nonsense is brought forth whenever issues of
science and religion are covered in the media.
Thinking of himself
as a grand world - historical figure, attuned to the latest intellectual trend (preferably one with a tinge of futurism and
science, like global
warming), demonstrating his own incomparable depth and farsightedness.
Despite the «
science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global -
warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good
science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.
I have always thought that the global
warming, or «climate change» debate, was
as much about social psychology
as science.
«Stop Global
Warming: The Solution is You» teaches about the science behind global warming, as well as activism (something I'm especially ke
Warming: The Solution is You» teaches about the
science behind global
warming, as well as activism (something I'm especially ke
warming,
as well
as activism (something I'm especially keen on).
Bummis recently had this article
as well for some of the
science behind the
warm prerinse: http://blog.bummis.com/2011/10/laundry-
science.html#!/2011/10/laundry-
science.html
«I pointed out the planet has existed for four billion years,» Yeo said earlier in our interview,
as he outlined his rationale on the
science underpinning global
warming.
But Taylor of the Heartland Institute said it should not come
as a surprise that the subject of human induced global
warming would become more contested
as it moved out of the realm of pure
science into the realm of policy.
«Our findings mean that nature is not
as efficient in slowing global
warming as we previously thought,» said Kees Jan van Groenigen, research fellow at the Center for Ecosystem
Science and Society at NAU and lead author of the study.
When it comes to major environmental problems such
as global
warming, he believes that our ability to cope depends on a broad - based educational push for earth
sciences, of the kind we already have for biology and public health.
Last year, a study published in
Science Advances found that the oceans have been steadily storing more heat since the 1980s and that deeper layers of the ocean are starting to
warm up,
as well.
For almost 100 years,
Science News has been reporting the latest advances in science, such as this week's cover story by reporter Laurel Hamers, «When bogs burn, the environment takes a hit,» on how the increased frequency of bog fires worldwide is becoming a surprisingly large source of air pollution and climate - warming carbon d
Science News has been reporting the latest advances in
science, such as this week's cover story by reporter Laurel Hamers, «When bogs burn, the environment takes a hit,» on how the increased frequency of bog fires worldwide is becoming a surprisingly large source of air pollution and climate - warming carbon d
science, such
as this week's cover story by reporter Laurel Hamers, «When bogs burn, the environment takes a hit,» on how the increased frequency of bog fires worldwide is becoming a surprisingly large source of air pollution and climate -
warming carbon dioxide.
► In a story about the animal species that are winning and losing
as the Arctic
warms, in this week's
Science, Eli Kintisch offers a peek into the extreme working and living conditions of some of the biologists, zoologists, geoscientists, oceanographers, and atmospheric scientists conducting this research.
«Using more recent data and better analysis methods we have been able to re-examine the global weather balloon network, known
as radiosondes, and have found clear indications of
warming in the upper troposphere,» said lead author ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System
Science Chief Investigator Prof Steve Sherwood.
What happens when the world moves into a
warm, interglacial period isn't certain, but in 2009, a paper published in
Science by researchers found that upwelling in the Southern Ocean increased
as the last ice age waned, correlated to a rapid rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide.
That representation matches the public discourse around global
warming, in which previous studies have shown that media characterize climate change
as unsettled
science with high levels of scientific uncertainty.
Cooney himself made 294 edits to the administration's 364 - page Strategic Plan for the U.S. Climate Change
Science Program posted July 24, 2003, «to exaggerate or emphasize scientific uncertainties or to deemphasize or diminish the importance of the human role in global
warming,» and Cooney and the CEQ played a role in eliminating climate change sections in the EPA's draft Report on the Environment
as well
as its National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report.
Beyond basic subjects such
as climate and weather, this site from the U.K. Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs covers a wide range of pressing atmospheric
science issues including acid rain, air quality, climate change, global
warming and ozone depletion.
The new report, from a panel of the interagency National
Science and Technology Council, says that too little is known about endocrine disruptors to say where they rank compared to other environmental problems such
as global
warming and loss of species habitat.
«
As the climate gets
warmer, the thawing permafrost not only enables the release of more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, but our study shows that it also allows much more mineral - laden and nutrient - rich water to be transported to rivers, groundwater and eventually the Arctic Ocean,» explained Ryan Toohey, a researcher at the Interior Department's Alaska Climate
Science Center in Anchorage and the lead author of the study.
But
as the world
warms they will shrink and temperatures will rise ever higher, according to a study that could help to resolve one of the biggest uncertainties in climate
science.
Despite her accolades, Blackburn is
warm and accessible, with traces of the shy
science nerd who would serenade creatures
as a child.
As the world
warms, many species will once again be forced to flee, says Scott Loarie, a biogeographer at the Carnegie Institution for
Science at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, who coauthored the 2009 study.
U.S. geoscientists are accustomed to being used
as a punching bag by climate change skeptics in Congress, who challenge the
science of global
warming.
The research published in the journal
Science Advances predicts that
as the oceans
warm fish — which appear to be superior predators in
warm water — will extend their ranges away from the equator and cause a decline in the diversity of invertebrates such
as crabs, lobsters, sea urchins and whelks.
The National
Science Foundation - funded study appears in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 45 years after atmospheric scientists Mikhail Budyko and William Sellers hypothesized that the Arctic would amplify global
warming as sea ice melted.
Results of a new study by researchers at the Northeast Climate
Science Center (NECSC) at the University of Massachusetts Amherst suggest that temperatures across the northeastern United States will increase much faster than the global average, so that the 2 - degrees Celsius
warming target adopted in the recent Paris Agreement on climate change will be reached about 20 years earlier for this part of the U.S. compared to the world
as a whole.
He held a hearing in December that described the
science around
warming as a kind of liberal religion.
If so, instead of clumping, the researchers report in tomorrow's issue of
Science, this
warm dark matter would have stretched into filaments thousands of light - years long and weighing
as much
as millions of suns.
If
science can nail climate change
as a probable cause of deadly weather events, like the heatwave that hit Europe in the summer of 2003, then global
warming becomes a matter for product liability law.
«This quantitative attribution of human and natural climate influences on the IPWP expansion increases our confidence in the understanding of the causes of past changes
as well
as for projections of future changes under further greenhouse
warming,» commented Seung - Ki Min, a professor with POSTECH's School of Environmental
Science and Engineering.
One of climate
science's great quests is to project how much earth
warms when carbon dioxide concentrations double — something known
as climate sensitivity.
In a paper published in
Science today, researchers from ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (Coral CoE) at James Cook University (JCU) and the University of Queensland (UQ),
as well
as the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) investigated what this
warming pattern means for GBR coral bleaching events into the future.
But the win was also a hopeful sign for scientists who have watched from the sidelines in disbelief
as politicians cut
science funding and distorted research on evolution, stem cells and global
warming.
Within moments, a roasty scent permeates this food
science laboratory at Pennsylvania State University, conjuring in my mind my local bakery in the predawn hours
as baguette loaves — golden - brown, crusty and
warm — are taken out of massive ovens on rolling steel carts.
Candidates who believe in global
warming are describing the plan
as an economic anchor; so are those who question the
science behind
warming.
«I am sure that those global leaders were driven by a primitive fear that the present ambient
warm weather is somehow caused by humanity; and that fear —
as far
as I understand the
science — is equally without foundation,» he said.
More recently, his service on the
science committee was interrupted by 4 years
as the senior Republican on the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global
Warming, where he was a reliably skeptical voice on climate
science.
The IPCC's Working Group I on the physical
science of climate change found no evidence that greenhouse
warming has stopped,
as contrarians would have it.
In fact, Salmon doesn't think that the National
Science Foundation (NSF) should be funding her research on tea
as a model system for understanding how a
warming climate is putting stress on specialty crops and the impact of those changes on farmers.
(Reuters)- The U.S. electric industry knew
as far back
as 1968 that burning fossil fuels might cause global
warming, but cast doubt on the
science of climate change and ramped up coal use for decades afterward, an environmental watchdog group said on Tuesday.
When this world - class atmospheric scientist insists there's no such thing
as global
warming, is he talking
science — or religion?