IPCC global
warming science claims human CO2 emissions remain in the atmosphere for hundreds to thousands of years (not likely, but we'll assume it for this analysis).
Not exact matches
Despite the «
science is settled» and «consensus»
claims of the global -
warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good
science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.
But that hasn't stopped British newspaper The Mail on Sunday trying to resurrect a dead duck: this time
claiming that scientists at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) played fast and loose with data on a well - regarded 2015 paper in
Science that definitively showed there was no pause in global
warming.
The main
claims of fact he makes in support of his contention that Global
Warming science is an «idealogy, underpinned by false assumptions» are:
published report, Hayward stated that holding the US back from fulfilling it's petroleum - based product requirements is «a reluctance to develop the nation's massive natural resources under the mistaken belief in the unproven
science that
claims carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from burning of fossil fuels is the major cause of recent and future
warming of the Earth.
If
science is subjective, then RC has no
claim to being any more truthful than WUWT and Global
Warming really is a hoax.
A revealing look at RC's «real
science:» When SecularAnimist posts a dubious
claim (# 87) about the cause and effects of global
warming, it remains here.
There is very little
science behind the
claim that a doubling of CO2 will cause one degree C. of
warming — which even if true, adds up to a mere one degree C. of global
warming in about 200 years, assuming CO2 levels increase 2 ppm per year, and the hypothesis is correct.
There is no
science behind the
claim of future runaway
warming from positive water vapor feedback.
In other words, we can and should note that we are probably hitting the 400 ppm barrier, but then later when we drop slightly below, temporarily, 400ppm, the climate
science denialists will be all over that
claiming that there is no global
warming.
The main
claims of fact he makes in support of his contention that Global
Warming science is an «idealogy, underpinned by false assumptions» are:
If you are going to make
claims about the role of CO2 in the
warming of the earth climate system, I suggest you first make an effort to understand what the
science actually tells us.
Suppose that the
science is not settled (whatever that means), how does it follow that «It is probable that the case for anthropogenic
warming will not hold up» If you don't know enough to
claim that global
warming is real, then how can you know enough to
claim that AWG won't hold up?
More than 650 scientists from around the world dispute the
claims made by the United Nations and former Vice President Al Gore about global
warming, saying that
science does not support that climate change is a manmade phenomenon, according to a posting on the Senate environmental committee's press blog.
What The
Science Says: If anyone
claims to be part of the 97 %, it means they disagree with the contrarian argument that humans are having a minimal impact on global
warming.
RT @LegInsurrection: Mad
Science:
Claim that «Islamophobia» is accelerating Global
Warming!
RT @GerardvanE1: Mad
Science:
Claim that «Islamophobia» is accelerating Global
Warming!
However,
claiming an overwhelming scientific justification for the Plan based upon anthropogenic global
warming does a disservice both to climate
science and to the policy process.
The crux of Bates»
claim is that NOAA, the federal government's top agency in charge of climate
science, published a poorly - researched but widely praised study with the political goal of disproving the controversial global
warming hiatus theory, which suggests that global
warming slowed down from 1998 until 2012 with little change in globally - averaged surface temperatures — a direct contrast to global
warming advocates»
claim that the earth's temperature has been constantly increasing.
Global
warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic
science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then
claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global
warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other words.
RT @leginsurrection Mad
Science:
Claim that «Islamophobia» is accelerating Global
Warming!
Mad
Science:
Claim that «Islamophobia» is accelerating Global
Warming!
Mad
Science:
Claim that Islamophobia is accelerating Global
Warming https://t.co/zcc9WTKfSg #ff #tcot #globalwarming
The scientists also put paid to
claims that global
warming has «stopped» because global temperatures in the past 15 years have not continued the strong upward march of the preceding years, which is a key argument put forward by sceptics to cast doubt on climate
science.
Nova is an Australian climate denialist and author of «The Skeptic's Handbook,» a crash course in false
science claiming global
warming isn't happening and isn't human - caused.
Although global -
warming activists, including President Obama, consistently
claim that the
science on global
warming is settled, anyone who has any familiarity with the scientific process would understand that research is a constant, ongoing process.
«SEVERAL OF THE LEADING MEDIA CRUSADERS AGAINST GLOBAL
WARMING SCIENCE HAVE NOW RETRACTED THEIR
CLAIMS!
in which several of the leading media crusaders against global
warming science have now retracted their
claims.
Remarkably, the same individuals surface repeatedly - some of the same figures who have
claimed that the
science of global
warming is «not settled» denied the truth of studies linking smoking to lung cancer, coal smoke to acid rain, and CFCs to the ozone hole.
Several of the leading media crusaders against global
warming science have now retracted their
claims!!
Source here In a late February (2017) interview on a U.S. news program, mechanical engineer Bill Nye
claimed that the settled
science says humans have been
warming the planet at a rate that is unnaturally and «catastrophically» fast since the year 1750.
He says global
warming is based not on
science but on a «hoax» and on «witchcraft» and on «
claims dreamt up by environmental activists».
The
claim that 2014 was the hottest year in history shows that the global
warming scare is not a high point in the history of
science.
Haapala also pointed out how unscientific such scheming was — especially when perpetrated by those
claiming that the «
science is settled» and that humanity must promptly submit to a draconian UN «global
warming» regime.
Commenting on the latest deception surrounding the «
warmest on record»
claim, Spencer said that even
science itself was under assault by the politically driven
warming alarmists.
A report in The Sunday Times on 24 January
claimed that the United Nations climate
science panel (IPCC) wrongly linked global
warming to an increase in the number and severity of natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods.
«Mr. Gore's Movie has
Claims no Informed Expert Endorses» By Bob Unruh More than 31,000 scientists across the US, «including more than 9,000 PhD.s in fields such as atmospheric
science, climatology, Earth
science, environment and dozens of other specialties, have signed a petition rejecting «global
warming,» the assumption that the human production of greenhouse -LSB-...]
Junk
Science is calling BS on Obama's
claim today that his daughter Malia is a victim of global
warming, having suffered an asthma attack in pre-school because of it.
For instance, US Senator James Imhofe of Kansas called climate change «the greatest hoax ever» (Johnson, 2011) To
claim that climate change
science is the greatest hoax ever is at minimum, if not a lie, reckless disregard for the truth given the number of prestigious scientific organizations that have publicly supported the consensus view, the undeniable
science supporting the conclusion that if greenhouse gases increase in the atmosphere some
warming should be expected, the clear link between rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere and increases in fossil fuel use around the world, as well undeniable increases in
warming being that have been experienced at the global scale.
In April 1998, Art Robinson and his organization the Oregon Institute of
Science and Medicine, along with the Exxon - backed George C. Marshall Institute, co-published the infamous «Oregon Petition»
claiming to have collected 17,000 signatories to a document arguing against the realities of global
warming.
This explains inclusion of a Global
Warming policy advocate like Boulton, to defend
claims about the general validity of «mainstream» IPCC
science.
«Mr. Gore's movie, asserting a «consensus» and «settled
science» in agreement about human - caused global
warming, conveyed the
claims about human - caused global
warming to ordinary movie goers and to public school children, to whom the film was widely distributed.
Enviro - activists using the mainstream media's monster - megaphone to push
claims of catastrophic man - caused global
warming as a settled
science needing immediate fixing have almost completely drowned out the opposition, and an unmistakable part of the blaring 20 year + message was the demand to ignore industry - bribed skeptics.
Tomcat October 19, 2012 at 1:40 am Myrrh you continue with your blatant lie — the laughable
claim that the
science establishment thinks the the sun does not
warm us.
And still Myrrh's scam goes on, with his oft - repeated, laughable
claim that the
science establishment thinks the the sun does not
warm us.
The recent listing of polar bears as «endangered» was based on junk
science and GIGO computer models that
claim manmade global
warming will send the bears» record population numbers into oblivion.
The climate
science denying group the Global
Warming Policy Foundation has admitted that it shared an «erroneous» temperature dataset to support Lord Lawson's false
claims to the BBC last week that global temperatures aren't rising.
I don't have much doubt that there has been some mild
warming due to AGW, but I think that there are many
claims of * possible * catastrophic outcomes (based on sketchy models) that pose as * probable * outcomes and consensus
science.
... and, of course, always check Skeptical
Science when you hear a
claim from someone saying global
warming isn't real.
Your guests would have us believe that sceptics contest the
claim that «global
warming is happening», whereas the question that most sceptics of climate
science ask is about the role of feedback mechanisms that are believed to amplify the global
warming effect — a subject on which there is far less consensus that your guests will admit.