The global
warming science establishment should now be open to similar studies and dissenting voices on CO2 to overturn the alleged climate change consensus.»
Not exact matches
Tomcat October 19, 2012 at 1:40 am Myrrh you continue with your blatant lie — the laughable claim that the
science establishment thinks the the sun does not
warm us.
And still Myrrh's scam goes on, with his oft - repeated, laughable claim that the
science establishment thinks the the sun does not
warm us.
Tomcat October 19, 2012 at 8:18 am Reply And still Myrrh's scam goes on, with his oft - repeated, laughable claim that the
science establishment thinks the the sun does not
warm us.
While the climate
science establishment continues its costly and misallocated efforts against «catastrophic» global
warming, the empirical evidence indicates the worlds» elites are pursuing a laughably ludicrous Don Quixote quest against an imaginary climate - evil.
I didn't know enough to question the
establishment science, but I kept wondering why I was never encountering reasonable discussions of what has to be the pros of a
warmer world.
Bob Tisdale is a respected and widely quoted expert on ocean
warming and cooling, who often exposes the serial falsehoods and exaggerations of the climate
science establishment, much to their dismay.
Now, adding to this miserably low
warming influence of CO2 is the recent admission by
establishment climate
science that natural climatic forces have a powerful say in the trend of global temperatures, regardless of human CO2 emissions.
How a tiny blog and a collective of climate enthusiasts broke the biggest story in the history of global
warming science — but not without a gatekeeper of the climate
establishment trying to halt its proliferation.
The climate
science fact that huge modern CO2 emissions did not generate the expected runaway
warming over the long - term, nor even over the shorter - term, now has the
establishment science journals questioning the obvious - how was the IPCC so wrong?