Updates below, 10:03 a.m. To my eye, perhaps the most important line in the summary of the new report on global
warming science from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is this:
Not exact matches
It's a
science - driven company focused on solving problems like world hunger and global
warming with, for instance, drought - resistance seeds, which have been gaining market share
from competitors but had to be developed over years.
Despite the «
science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global -
warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences
from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good
science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.
A new study by a team of researchers
from the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission's
science and knowledge service, sheds light on another, less well - known aspect of how these ecosystems, and forests in particular, can protect our planet against global
warming.
The initiative,
Science Based Targets, prods companies to establish plans to slash heat - trapping gases
from their operations to help stave off devastating global
warming.
This means that the
science of climate change may partially undergo a shift of its own, moving
from trying to prove it is a problem (it is now «very likely» that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have already caused enough
warming to trigger stronger droughts, heat waves, more and bigger forest fires and more extreme storms and flooding) to figuring out ways to fix it.
Researchers
from the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied
Science (SEAS) suggest that early Mars may have been
warmed intermittently by a powerful greenhouse effect.
The study, published online today in Environmental
Science & Technology, provides the most comprehensive set yet of direct measurements of emissions
from the distribution system and, with a series of partner studies, is helping to determine the natural gas industry's contribution to U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and to global
warming.
NOAA has been the target of congressional scrutiny
from Rep. Lamar Smith (R - Texas), who has launched an inquiry into a 2015 paper in
Science prepared by NOAA researchers that disputed the existence of a recent slowdown in the rate of global
warming.
«Moreover, the latest developments in climate
science lend greater urgency to the case for action: Effects on natural systems are already being observed and recent findings concerning the potential scope and magnitude of damages
from future
warming are increasingly worrisome,» the report says.
These findings
from University of Melbourne Scientists at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System
Science, reported in Nature Climate Change, are the result of research looking at how Australian extremes in heat, drought, precipitation and ocean
warming will change in a world 1.5 °C and 2 °C
warmer than pre-industrial conditions.
«Considering the Southern Ocean absorbs something like 60 % of heat and anthropogenic CO2 that enters the ocean, this wind has a noticeable effect on global
warming,» said lead author Dr Andy Hogg
from the Australian National University Hub of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System
Science.
Warm ocean waters, driven inland by winds, are undercutting an ice shelf that holds back a vast glacier
from sliding into the ocean, researchers report November 1 in
Science Advances.
The study's findings suggest that future sea level rise resulting
from global
warming will also have these hot spot periods superimposed on top of steadily rising seas, said study co-author Andrea Dutton, assistant professor in UF's department of geological
sciences in the College of Liberal Arts and
Sciences.
That's not enough to counteract an overall negative trend for the country, which, if the planet
warmed by 6 °C
from preindustrial levels, could suffer damage worth 6 % of its gross domestic product, the team reports today in
Science.
«Now, the question has shifted
from whether global
warming is happening to what to do about it,» said Naomi Oreskes, a
science historian at Harvard University, in an email.
Beyond basic subjects such as climate and weather, this site
from the U.K. Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs covers a wide range of pressing atmospheric
science issues including acid rain, air quality, climate change, global
warming and ozone depletion.
The new report,
from a panel of the interagency National
Science and Technology Council, says that too little is known about endocrine disruptors to say where they rank compared to other environmental problems such as global
warming and loss of species habitat.
The rapid northerly shifts in spawning may offer a preview of future conditions if ocean
warming continues, according to the new study published in Global Change Biology by scientists
from the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Oregon State University and NOAA Fisheries» Northwest Fisheries
Science Center.
«We expect the first heavy precipitation events with a clear global
warming signal will appear during winters in Russia, Canada and northern Europe over the next 10 - 30 years,» said co-author Dr Ed Hawkins
from the National Centre for Atmospheric
Science at the University of Reading, UK.
«We examined average and extreme temperatures because they were always projected to be the measure that is most sensitive to global
warming,» said lead author
from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System
Science, Dr Andrew King.
Building on a previous limited study of climate
warming on three Arctic lakes (
Science, 21 October 1994, 416), ecologist John Smol of Queens University, Kingston, Canada, and colleagues extracted sediment cores
from 46 lakes in Canada, Finland, Norway, and Russia.
The research published in the journal
Science Advances predicts that as the oceans
warm fish — which appear to be superior predators in
warm water — will extend their ranges away
from the equator and cause a decline in the diversity of invertebrates such as crabs, lobsters, sea urchins and whelks.
«When we included projected Antarctic wind shifts in a detailed global ocean model, we found water up to 4 °C
warmer than current temperatures rose up to meet the base of the Antarctic ice shelves,» said lead author Dr Paul Spence
from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System
Science (ARCCSS).
When the ground is frozen above a cave no water seeps into it, making such formations «relicts
from warmer periods before permafrost formed,» the researchers wrote in a study published online in
Science on 21 February.
The
science team obtained vital information about the physical characteristics within one large
warm - water eddy, which likely originated
from the North Brazil Current, and analyzed its potential influence on sub-surface ocean conditions during the passage of tropical cyclones.
At least two studies published since 2010 — one report
from the United Nations Environment Programme in 2011 and a follow - up published in
Science last year — suggested that significantly reducing the emissions of soot and methane could trim human - caused
warming by at least 0.5 °C (0.9 ° F) by 2050, compared with an increase of about 1 °C if those emissions continued unabated.
The
warm ocean water presently melting Totten Glacier — East Antarctica's largest glacier, which flows
from the Aurora Basin — could be an early warning sign, said co-lead author Amelia Shevenell, an associate professor in the University of South Florida College of Marine
Science.
While they will certainly miss out on the pleasure and intellectual excitement that come
from knowing how the world works, how much
science do they actually need to know to make up their minds about the issues surrounding genetic engineering or global
warming?
The findings
from researchers at the University of Miami (UM) Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric
Science provide new evidence that climate change in the tropical Pacific will result in changes in rainfall patterns in the region and amplify
warming near the equator in the future.
After naming global
warming the top
science story of 2004, Discover received numerous questions
from readers about the
science.
In a paper published in
Science today, researchers
from ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (Coral CoE) at James Cook University (JCU) and the University of Queensland (UQ), as well as the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) investigated what this
warming pattern means for GBR coral bleaching events into the future.
Research conducted by Jin - Soo Kim and Professor Jong - Seong Kug
from the Division of Environmental
Science and Engineering at Pohang University of
Science and Technology (POSTECH), in collaboration with Professor Su - Jong Jeong
from the School of Environmental
Science and Engineering at South University of
Science and Technology of China, has shown that the
warmer Arctic has triggered cooler winters and springs in North America, which has in turn weakened vegetation growth and lowered carbon uptake capacity in its ecosystems.
But the win was also a hopeful sign for scientists who have watched
from the sidelines in disbelief as politicians cut
science funding and distorted research on evolution, stem cells and global
warming.
Those are some of the key messages in the «Summary for Policymakers» of the physical
science of global
warming from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released on September 27.
The new text will say: «To describe those who don't accept climate
science or dispute the world is
warming from man - made forces, use climate change doubters or those who reject mainstream climate
science.
«The overall significance is that although we already know that reducing methane emissions can bring great societal benefits via decreased near - term
warming and improved air quality, and that many of the sources can be controlled at low or even negative cost, we still need better data on emissions
from particular sources,» Duke University climate
sciences professor Drew Shindell said.
«But to solve the pressing problems that require public acceptance of well - established
science —
from global
warming to vaccinations to the increasing overuse of antibiotics — scientists must indeed inspire more public faith in their methods and their mutually enforced trustworthiness.»
That carbon belching
from our factories causes global
warming is well - known, but beyond that, the
science becomes controversy.
This sustained climate
warming will drive the ocean's fishery yields into steep decline 200 years
from now and that trend could last at least a millennium, according to University of California, Irvine, and Cornell University researchers in
Science, March 9.
«My perspective is that it is not settled
science,» he told the Senate spending panel, arguing that the jury is still out on whether carbon dioxide emissions
from human activities are driving global
warming.
Angelo, the summary refers to what the authors see as a common misunderstanding (in their words, «an incorrect interpretation of climate
science»): that we are committed to further
warming from past emissions.
From stem cell research to global
warming, human cloning, evolution, and beyond, the
science debates are not exactly about
science, but come down to a dispute between liberals and conservatives about the right way to think about the future.
That a
warmer world is likely to lead to increased winter rainfall, particularly intense periods of rainfall, over the UK, comes
from well understood
science.
A paper published last week in the journal
Science examined how the ocean's ecosystems react to such
warming from climate change.
At risk of going beyond the theme of this thread, I offer up excerpts
from it because I think Orr's review speaks indirectly to the larger issue of how we as humans and as a global society are reacting to the findings of the earth
sciences regarding anthropogenic global
warming, climate disruption, and their ensuing ecological and socio - economic consequences:
«They do a nice job showing that exceptionally
warm temperatures
from 2012 - 2014 amplified drought conditions for California,» Nate Mantua, a climate scientist at the Southwest Fisheries
Science Center who has previously written about temperature variations in the region, said.
With its powerful suite of complementary
science instruments, the mission soon revealed a towering plume of water ice and vapor, salts and organic materials that issues
from relatively
warm fractures on the wrinkled surface.
«The polar bear was the first species protected under the Endangered Species Act solely because of threats
from global
warming,» said Shaye Wolf, climate
science director for the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group.
published report, Hayward stated that holding the US back
from fulfilling it's petroleum - based product requirements is «a reluctance to develop the nation's massive natural resources under the mistaken belief in the unproven
science that claims carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions
from burning of fossil fuels is the major cause of recent and future
warming of the Earth.